Survey data show that most Tanzanian women find wife-beating justifiable. What is the meaning of the violence that enjoys such broad social approval? Does respect for women’s agency invalidate feminist opposition to wife-beating? I explore these questions by analyzing data on hegemonic norms generated through 27 focus group discussions in Arumeru and Kigoma-Vijijini districts, and find that wife-beating was supported for its role in constituting social order. This analysis of how exactly violence can constitute order yielded insights into the interplay between violence and consent that are theoretically relevant to violence against women in other forms and contexts, reminding researchers and practitioners of the role of power and coercion in supposedly agreed-upon community norms.
AmatrudoA. (2009). Criminology and political theory. London, England: Sage.
2.
ArnfredS. (2004). Gender research in Africa: Dilemmas and challenges as seen by an outsider. In ArnfredS.Bakare-YusufB.Kisiang’aniE. W.LewisD.OyewumiO.SteadyF. C. (Eds.), African gender scholarship: Concepts, methodologies and paradigms (pp. 82-100). Dakar: CODESRIA.
3.
BarbourR.KitzingerJ. (1999). Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. London, England: Sage.
4.
BetronM. (2008). Gender-based violence in Tanzania: An assessment of policies, services and promising interventions. Washington, DC: USAID Health Policy Initiative.
5.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
6.
BumillerK. (2010). The nexus of domestic violence reform and social science: From instrument of social change to institutionalized surveillance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6, 173-193.
7.
ClarkA. (2002). Wife beating and the law in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. In SmartC. (Ed.), Regulating womanhood. London: Routledge.
8.
CornwallA.HarrisonE.WhiteheadA. (2007). Feminisms in development: Contradictions, contestations and challenges. London, England: Zed Books.
9.
DeKeseredyW.SchwartzM. (2009). Dangerous exits: Escaping abusive relationships in rural America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
10.
DobashR. E.DobashR. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.
11.
FassinD. (2011). Humanitarian reason: A moral history of the present. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
FergusonJ. (1990). The anti-politics machine: “Development,” depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
FischerG. (2014). Tanzanian women’s move into wage labour: Conceptualizing deference, sexuality and respectability as criteria for workplace suitability. Gender, Work & Organization, 21, 135-148.
14.
GagnéP. L. (1992). Appalachian women: Violence and social control. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 20, 387-415.
15.
Garcia-MorenoC.JansenH. A.EllsbergM.HeiseL.WattsC. (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: Initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. Geneva: World Health Organization.
16.
GiddensA. (1986). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
GramsciA.Nowell-SmithG.HoareQ. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (HoareQ.SmithG. N., Eds. & Trans.). New York: International Publishers.
18.
HanmerJ. (1978). Violence and the social control of women. In LittlejohnG. (Ed.) Power and the state: Explorations in sociology (pp. 9-23). London: Croom Helm.
19.
HanmerJ.SaundersS. (1984). Well-founded fear: A community study of violence to women. London, England: Hutchinson.
20.
HearnJ. (2013). The sociological significance of domestic violence: Tensions, paradoxes and implications. Current Sociology, 61, 152-170.
21.
HunnicuttG. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting “patriarchy” as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15, 553-573.
22.
IvaskaA. M. (2002). “Anti–mini militants meet modern misses”: Urban style, gender and the politics of “national culture” in 1960s Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Gender & History, 14, 584-607.
23.
JakobsenH. (2012). Focus groups and methodological rigour outside the minority world: Making the method work to its strengths in Tanzania. Qualitative Research, 12, 111-130.
24.
JakobsenH. (2014). What’s gendered about gender-based violence? An empirically grounded theoretical exploration from Tanzania. Gender & Society, 28, 537-561.
25.
JakobsenH. (2015). The good beating: Social norms supporting men’s partner violence in Tanzania (Doctoral thesis, University of Bergen, Norway). Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1PcYzo9
26.
JonesS. (2007). Antonio Gramsci. London: Taylor & Francis.
27.
KhaderS. J. (2011). Adaptive preferences and women’s empowerment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
28.
KhaderS. J. (2012). Must theorising about adaptive preferences deny women’s agency?Journal of Applied Philosophy, 29, 302-317.
29.
KrishnanS.VohraD.De WalqueD.MedlinC.NathanR.DowW. H. (2012). Tanzanian couples’ perspectives on gender equity, relationship power, and intimate partner violence: Findings from the RESPECT study. AIDS Research and Treatment, 2012, Article 187890.
30.
LearsT. J. (1985). The concept of cultural hegemony: Problems and possibilities. American Historical Review, 90, 567-593.
31.
LewisD. (2003). African women’s studies: A review essay. Cape Town: African Gender Institute.
32.
LewisD. (2008). Discursive challenges for African feminisms. Quest: An African Journal of Philosophy, 20, 77-96.
33.
LovettM. (1996). “She thinks she’s like a man”: Marriage and (de)constructing gender identity in colonial Buha, Western Tanzania, 1943–1960. Canadian Journal of African Studies, 30, 52-68.
34.
MamaA. (2011). What does it mean to do feminist research in African contexts?Feminist Review, 98(1, Suppl.), e4-e20.
35.
MarshallH.DouglasK.McDonnellD. (2007). Deviance and social control: Who rules?Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
McCleary-SillsJ.NamyS.NyoniJ.RweyemamuD.StevenE.SalvatoryA. (2013). Help-seeking pathways and barriers for survivors of gender-based violence in Tanzania: Results from a study in Dar es Salaam, Mbeya, and Iringa Regions. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: EngenderHealth/CHAMPION.
37.
MogfordE. (2011). When status hurts: Dimensions of women’s status and domestic abuse in rural Northern India. Violence Against Women, 17, 835-857.
38.
National Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Tanzania demographic and health survey 2010. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Author.
39.
PalermoT.BleckJ.PetermanA. (2014). Tip of the iceberg: Reporting and gender-based violence in developing countries. American Journal of Epidemiology, 179, 602-612.
40.
Planning Commission. (1999). The Tanzania development vision 2025. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: President’s Office.
41.
RayL. (2011). Violence and society. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
42.
RidgewayC. L.CorrellS. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18, 510-531.
43.
RigerS.GordonM. T. (1981). The fear of rape: A study in social control. Journal of Social Issues, 37(4), 71-92.
44.
SheikhL. (2002). TAMWA: Levina’s song—Supporting women in Tanzania. In ChiguduH. (Ed.), Composing a New Song: Stories of Empowerment from Africa (pp. 95-128). London, England: Commonwealth Foundation.
45.
StankoE. A. (1996). Warnings to women: Police advice and women’s safety in Britain. Violence Against Women, 2, 5-24.
46.
StankoE. A. (1997). Safety talk: Conceptualizing women’s risk assessment as a “technology of the soul.”Theoretical Criminology, 1, 479-499.
47.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48.
StarkE. (2009). Rethinking coercive control. Violence Against Women, 15, 1509-1525.
49.
SumnerC. (1994). The sociology of deviance: An obituary. London, England: Open University Press.
50.
SumnerC. (1997). Violence, culture and censure. New York: Taylor & Francis.
51.
SumnerC. (2012). Censure, culture and political economy: Beyond the death of deviance debate. In HallS.WinlowS. (Eds.), New directions in criminological theory. London: Routledge.
52.
United Nations (1995). Beijing Declaration and Platform of Action, adopted at the Fourth World Conference on Women, 27 October 1995, available at: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/ [accessed 6 November 2016]
53.
WalbyS. (2009). Globalization and inequalities: Complexity and contested modernities. London, England: Sage.
54.
WalbyS. (2013). Violence and society: Introduction to an emerging field of sociology. Current Sociology, 61, 95-111.
55.
WarnerJ. M.CampbellD. A. (2000). Supply response in an agrarian economy with non-symmetric gender relations. World Development, 28, 1327-1340.
