We argue that the concept of power has been inadvertently sidelined in recent theory and research on husband violence. Three types of relationship power may matter with respect to husband violence: attempted power, actual power, and achieved power. Analyses of a randomly selected representative sample of 270 married or partnered women in Kathmandu showed that actual power was related to husband violence prevalence, severity, and injury. Achieved power was related to husband violence prevalence and severity, and attempted power was related to husband violence injury. Implications are discussed.
BabcockJ.WaltzJ.JacobsonN.GottmanJ. (1993). Power and violence: The relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies and domestic violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 40-50.
2.
BalogunM.OwoajeE.FawoleO. (2012). Intimate partner violence in southwestern Nigeria: Are there rural-urban differences?Women & Health, 52, 627-645.
3.
BloodR.WolfeD. (1960). Husbands and wives. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
4.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Fawcett Books.
ColemanD.StrausM. (1986). Marital power, conflict, and violence in a nationally representative sample of American couples. Violence and Victims, 1, 141-157.
7.
DahrendorfR. (1970). On the origin of inequality among men. In LaumannE. O.SiegelP. M.HodgeR. W. (Eds.), The logic of social hierarchies (pp. 16-44). Chicago, IL: Markham.
8.
DhakalS. (2008). Nepalese women under the shadow of domestic violence. Lancet, 371, 547-548.
9.
DobashR.DobashR. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.
10.
DurkheimE. (1984). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1893)
11.
DuttonD.NichollsT. (2005). The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1-the conflict of theory and data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 680-714.
12.
EmeryC. (2011). Disorder or deviant order? Re-theorizing domestic violence in terms of order, power, and legitimacy: A typology. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 525-540.
13.
EmeryC.KimJ.SongH.SongA. (2013). Child abuse as a catalyst for wife abuse?Journal of Family Violence, 28, 141-152.
14.
EmeryC.WuS. (2016). Who calls the shots in Beijing? Resources, culture and equality in family decision power. Under review.
15.
FrenchJ.RavenB. (1959). The bases of social power. In CartwrightD. (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
16.
FriezeI.McHughM. (1992). Power and influence strategies in violent and nonviolent marriages. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 449-465.
17.
Graham-KevanN.ArcherJ. (2003). Intimate terrorism and common couple violence: A test of Johnson’s predictions in four British samples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 1247-1270.
18.
GramsciA. (1992). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
19.
Holtzworth-MunroeA.StuartG. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the difference among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 476-497.
JohnsonM. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 283-294.
22.
JohnsonM. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
23.
JohnsonM.LeoneJ. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 322-349.
24.
KimJ.EmeryC. (2003). Marital power, conflict, norm consensus, and marital violence in a nationally representative sample of Korean couples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 197-218.
25.
MartinD. (1981). Battered wives. San Francisco, CA: Volcano Press.
26.
MatzaD. (1990). Delinquency and drift. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. (Original work published 1964)
PaudelG. (2007). Domestic violence against women in Nepal. Gender Technology and Development, 11, 199-233.
30.
PenceE.PaymarM. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York: Springer.
31.
PtacekJ. (1988). Why do men batter their wives? In YlloK.BogradM. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 133-157). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
SagrestanoL.HeaveyC.ChristensenA. (1999). Perceived power and physical violence in marital conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 65-79.
33.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
StrausM.DouglasE. (2004). A short form of the revised conflict tactics scales, and typologies for severity and mutuality. Violence and Victims, 19, 507-520.
35.
StrausM.GellesR. (1990). Physical violence in American families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
36.
WallerW. (1937). The rating and dating complex. American Sociological Review, 2, 727-734.
37.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and society. Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Original work published 1922).
38.
YlloK.BogradM. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
YlloK.StrausM. (1990). Patriarchy and violence against wives: The impact of structural and normative factors. In StrausM.GellesR. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 383-399). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
40.
YoshihamaM.RamakrishnanA.HammockA.KhaliqM. (2012). Intimate partner violence prevention program in an Asian immigrant community: Integrating theories data, and community. Violence Against Women, 18, 763-783.
