Scripts are influential in shaping sexual behaviors. Prior studies have examined the influence of individuals’ rape scripts. However, these scripts have not been evaluated among diverse groups. The current study examined the rape scripts of African American (n = 72) and European American (n = 99) college women. Results supported three rape scripts: the “real rape,” the “party rape,” and the mismatched intentions rape, that were equally common. However, there were some differences, with African Americans’ narratives more often including active victim resistance and less often containing victim vulnerability themes. Societal and cultural influences on rape scripts are discussed.
ArmstrongE. A.EnglandP.FogartyA. C. K. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77, 435-462. doi:10.1177/0003122412445802
2.
BaldwinM. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461-484. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.461
3.
Bay-ChengL. Y.Eliseo-ArrasR. K. (2008). The making of unwanted sex: Gendered and neoliberal norms in college women’s unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 386-397. doi:10.1080/00224490802398381
4.
Bryant-DavisT.ChungH.TillmanS. (2009). From the margins to the center: Ethnic minority women and the mental health effects of sexual assault. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10, 330-357. doi:10.1177/1524838009339755
5.
ByersE. S. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. In ByersE. S.O’SullivanL. F. (Eds.), Sexual coercion in dating relationships (pp. 7-24). New York: Haworth.
6.
ChenY.UllmanS. E. (2010). Women’s reporting of sexual and physical assaults to police in the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 16, 262-279. doi:10.1177/1077801209360861
7.
ClarkM. D.CarrollM. H. (2008). Acquaintance rape scripts of women and men: Similarities and differences. Sex Roles, 58, 616-625. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9373-3
8.
CohenJ. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
9.
CurrierD. M. (2013). Strategic ambiguity: Protecting emphasized femininity and hegemonic masculinity in the hookup culture. Gender & Society, 27, 704-727. doi:10.1177/0891243213493960
10.
DupuisE. C.ClayJ. A. (2013). The role of race and respectability in attributions of responsibility for acquaintance rape. Violence and Victims, 28, 1085-1095. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-12-00013
11.
EdwardsK. M.TurchikJ. A.DardisC. M.ReynoldsN.GidyczC. A. (2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, 65, 761-773. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9943-2
12.
FiskeS. T.TaylorS. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
FrenchB. H. (2013). More than Jezebels and freaks: Exploring how Black girls navigate sexual coercion and sexual scripts. Journal of African American Studies, 17, 35-50. doi:10.1007/s12111-012-9218-1
14.
FrithH.KitzingerC. (2001). Reformulating sexual script theory: Developing a discursive psychology of sexual negotiation. Theory & Psychology, 11, 209-232. doi:10.1177/0959354301112004
15.
GillumT. L. (2002). Exploring the link between stereotypic images and intimate partner violence in the African American community. Violence Against Women, 8, 64-86. doi:10.1177/10778010222182946
16.
KahnA. S.MathieV. A.TorglerC. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 53-66. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00296.x
17.
KossM. P.AbbeyA.CampbellR.CookS.NorrisJ.TestaM.. (2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 357-360. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x
18.
KrahéB. (1991). Police officers’ definitions of rape: A prototype study. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 1, 223-244. doi:10.1002/casp.2450010305
19.
KrebsC. P.LindquistC. B.WarnerT. D.FisherB. S.MartinS. L. (2009). College women’s experiences with physically forced, alcohol- or other-drug enabled, and drug-facilitated sexual assault before and since entering college. Journal of American College Health, 57, 639-649. doi:10.3200/JACH.57.6.639-649
20.
LittletonH. L. (2011). Rape myths and beyond: A commentary on Edwards and colleagues (2011). Sex Roles, 65, 792-797. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9982-8
21.
LittletonH. L.AxsomD. (2003). Rape and seduction scripts of university students: Implications for rape attributions and unacknowledged rape. Sex Roles, 49, 465-475. doi:10.1023/A:1025824505185
22.
LittletonH. L.Grills-TaquechelA. E.AxsomD. (2009). Impaired and incapacitated rape victims: Assault characteristics and post-assault experiences. Violence and Victims, 24, 439-457. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.24.4.439
23.
LittletonH. L.Grills-TaquechelA. E.BuckK. S.RosmanL.DoddJ. C. (2013). Health risk behavior and sexual assault among ethnically diverse women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 7-21. doi:10.1177/0361684312451842
24.
LittletonH. L.RhatiganD. L.AxsomD. (2007). Unacknowledged rape: How much do we know about the hidden rape victim?Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 14, 57-74. doi:10.1300/J146v14n04_04
25.
LittletonH. L.TabernikH.CanalesE. J.BackstromT. (2009). Risky situation or harmless fun? A qualitative examination of college women’s bad hook-up and rape scripts. Sex Roles, 60, 793-804. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9586-8
26.
LittletonH. L.UllmanS. E. (2013). PTSD symptomatology and hazardous drinking as risk factors for sexual assault revictimization: Examination in European American and African American women. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 26, 1-9. doi:10.1002/jts.21807
27.
LohC.GidyczC. A.LoboT. R.LuthraR. (2005). A prospective analysis of sexual assault perpetration: Risk factors related to perpetrator characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1325-1348. doi:10.1177/0886260505278528
28.
LonswayK. A.ArchambaultJ. (2012). The “justice gap” for sexual assault cases: Future directions for research and reform. Violence Against Women, 18, 145-168. doi:10.1177/1077801212440017
29.
MastersN. T.CaseyE.WellsE. A.MorrisonD. M. (2013). Sexual scripts among young heterosexually active men and women: Continuity and change. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 409-420. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.661102
30.
McCauleyJ.RuggieroK. J.ResnickH. S.ConoscentiL. M.KilpatrickD. G. (2009). Forcible, drug-facilitated, and incapacitated rape in relation to substance use problems: Results from a national sample of college women. Addictive Behaviors, 34, 458-462. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.12.004
31.
PaulE. L. (2006). Beer goggles, catching feelings, and the walk of shame: The myths and realities of the hookup experience. In KirkpatrickD. C.DuckS.FoleyM. K. (Eds.), Relating difficulty: The processes of constructing and managing difficult interactions (pp. 141-160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
PeredaN.GuileraG.FornsM.Gómez-BenitoJ. (2009). The prevalence of child sexual abuse in community and student samples: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 328-338. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.02.007
33.
RyanK. M. (1988). Rape and seduction scripts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 237-245. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00939.x
34.
RyanK. M. (2011). The relationship between rape myths and sexual scripts: The social construction of rape. Sex Roles, 65, 744-782. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0033-2
35.
SchankR. C.AbelsonR. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In Wyer Jr.R. S. (Ed.), Knowledge and memory: The real story (pp. 1-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
ScullyD.MarollaJ. (1985). “Riding the bull at Gilley’s”: Convicted rapists describe the rewards of rape. Social Problems, 32, 251-263. doi:10.2307/800685
37.
SealD. W.O’SullivanL. F.EhrhardtA. A. (2007). Miscommunications and misinterpretations: Men’s scripts about sexual communication and unwanted sex in interactions with women. In KimmelM. (Ed.), The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts (pp. 141-161). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
38.
SimmsD. C.ByersE. S. (2013). Heterosexual daters’ sexual initiation behaviors: Use of the theory of planned behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 105-116. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9994-7
39.
StephensD. P.FewA. L. (2007). Hip hop honey or video ho: African American preadolescents’ understanding of female sexual scripts in hip hop culture. Sexuality & Culture, 11, 48-60. doi:10.1007/s12119-007-9012-8
40.
StephensD. P.PhillipsL. (2003). Freaks, gold diggers, divas, and dykes: The sociohistorical development of adolescent African American women’s sexual scripts. Sexuality & Culture, 7, 3-47. doi:10.1007/BF03159848
41.
StephensD. P.PhillipsL. (2005). Integrating Black feminist thought into conceptual frameworks of African American adolescent women’s sexual scripting processes. Sexualities, Evolution & Gender, 7, 37-55.
42.
StokesC. E. (2007). Representin’ in cyberspace: Sexual scripts, self-definition, and hip hop culture in Black American adolescent girls’ home pages. Culture, Health & Sexuality: An International Journal for Research, Intervention, and Care, 9, 169-184. doi:10.1080/13691050601017512
43.
ThomasA. J.WitherspoonK. M.SpeightS. L. (2004). Toward the development of The Stereotypic Roles for Black Women Scale. Journal of Black Psychology, 30, 426-442. doi:10.1177/0095798404266061
44.
TillmanS.Bryant-DavisT.SmithK.MarksA. (2010). Shattering silence: Exploring barriers to disclosure for African American sexual assault survivors. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 11, 59-70. doi:10.1177/1524838010363717
45.
TurchikJ. A.ProbstD. R.IrvinC. R.ChauM.GidyczC. A. (2009). Prediction of sexual assault experiences in college women based on rape scripts: A prospective analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 361-366. doi:10.1037/a0015157
46.
UllmanS. E. (2010). Talking about sexual assault: Society’s response to survivors. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
47.
WashingtonP. A. (2001). Disclosure patterns of Black female sexual assault survivors. Violence Against Women, 7, 1254-1283. doi:10.1177/10778010122183856
48.
WatsonL. B.RobinsonD.DispenzaF.NazariN. (2012). African American women’s sexual objectification experiences: A qualitative study. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 458-475. doi:10.1177/0361684312454724
49.
WilliamsL. M.SiegelJ. A.PomeroyJ. J. (2000). Validity of women’s self-reports of documented child sexual abuse. In StoneA. A.TurkkanJ. S.BachrachC. A.JobeJ. B.KurtzmanH. S. (Eds.), The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice (pp. 211-226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
