Despite improved understanding regarding domestic violence, child welfare and child contact, and related policy developments, problems persist regarding how the family courts deal with fathers’ violence in contested contact/residence cases. In the study reported here, analysis was undertaken of welfare reports prepared for the courts in such cases to investigate how and to what extent issues of domestic violence and children’s perspectives on these issues were taken into account when making recommendations to the courts. Analysis found that despite evidence of domestic violence and child welfare concerns, contact with fathers was viewed as desirable and inevitable in the vast majority of cases.
AbrahamsC. (1994). The hidden victims: Children and domestic violence. London, England: NCH Action for Children.
2.
AndersonL. (1997). Contact between children and violent fathers: In whose best interests?London, England: Rights of Women.
3.
ArisR.HarrisonC. (2007). Domestic violence and the supplemental information form C1A (Ministry of Justice Research Series 17/07). London, England: Ministry of Justice.
4.
ArisR.HarrisonC.HumphreysC. (2002). Safety and child contact: An analysis of the role of child contact centres in the context of domestic violence and child welfare concerns. London, England: Stationary Office.
5.
Association of Chief Officers of Probation. (1999). Response to the consultation on contact between children and violent parents. London, England: Author.
6.
BancroftL.SilvermanJ. G. (2002). The batterer as parent: Addressing the impact of domestic violence on family dynamics. London, England: Sage.
7.
BlackwellA.DaweF. (2003). Non-resident parental contact (Final Report). London, England: Office for National Statistics.
8.
BowkerL. H.ArbitellM.McFerronJ. R. (1988). On the relationship between wife beating and child abuse. In YlloK.BogradM. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 158-174). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
BrandonM.BaileyS.BeldersonP.GardnerR.SidebothamP.DodsworthJ.. (2009). Understanding serious case reviews and their impact: A biennial analysis of serious case reviews 2005-07 (Research Report DCSF-RR129). London, England: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
10.
BrymanA. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
BuchananA.HuntJ.BrethertonH.BreamV. (2001). Families in conflict: Perspectives of children and parents on the family court welfare service. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
12.
Children Act Sub-Committee of the Lord Chancellor’s Advisory Board on Family Law. (1999). Consultation paper on contact between children and violent parents. London, England: The Stationary Office.
13.
Children Act Sub-Committee of the Lord Chancellor’s Advisory Board on Family Law. (2000). A report to the Lord Chancellor on the question of parental contact in cases where there is domestic violence. London, England: Lord Chancellor’s Department.
14.
Children Act Sub-Committee of the Lord Chancellor’s Advisory Board on Family Law. (2002). Guidelines for good practice on parental contact in cases where there is domestic violence. London, England: Department of Constitutional Affairs.
15.
Department for Constitutional Affairs. (2004). Judicial statistics. London, England: The Stationary Office.
16.
Department for Constitutional Affairs. (2006). Judicial statistics. London, England: The Stationary Office.
17.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1992). Women, violence and social change. London, England: Routledge.
18.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (2000). The politics and policies of responding to violence against women. In HanmerJ.ItzinC. (with QuaidS.WigglesworthD.) (Eds.), Home truths about domestic violence: Feminist influences on policy and practice: A reader (pp. 187-204). London, England: Routledge.
19.
EdlesonJ. (1999). Children’s witnessing of adult domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 839-870.
20.
FarmerE.OwenM. (1995). Child protection practice: Private risks and public remedies. London, England: HMSO.
21.
HagueG.MalosE. (1993). Domestic violence: Action for change. Cheltenham, UK: New Clarion Press.
22.
HaroldG. T.HowarthE. L. (2004). How marital conflict and violence affects children: Theory, research and future directions. In CalderM. C. (Ed.), Children living with domestic violence: Towards a framework for assessment and intervention (pp. 56-73). Lyme Regis, Dorset, UK: Russell House Publishing.
23.
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Court Administration. (2005). Domestic violence, safety and family proceedings: Thematic review of the handling of domestic violence issues by the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) and the Administration of Family Courts in Her Majesty’s Courts Service (HMCS). Bristol, UK: Author.
24.
HesterM. (2006). Making it through the criminal justice system: Attrition and domestic violence. Social Policy and Society, 5, 79-90.
25.
HesterM.PearsonC. (1998). From periphery to centre: Domestic violence in work with abused children. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
26.
HesterM.PearsonC.HarwinN. (2007). Making an impact: Children and domestic violence: A reader (2nd ed.). London, England: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
27.
HesterM.PearsonC.RadfordL. (1997). Domestic violence: A national survey of court welfare and voluntary sector mediation practice. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
28.
HesterM.RadfordL. (1996). Domestic violence and child contact arrangements in England and Denmark. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
29.
HesterM.WestmarlandN.PearceJ.WilliamsonE. (2008). Early evaluation of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 (Ministry of Justice Research Series 14/08). London, England: Ministry of Justice.
30.
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary [HMIC] & Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate [HMCPSI]. (2004). Violence at home: A joint inspection of the investigation and prosecution of cases involving domestic violence. London, England: HMIC.
31.
HoldenG. W.GeffnerR.JourilesE. N. (1998). Children exposed to marital violence: Theory, research and applied issues. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32.
HumphreysC.ThiaraR. (2002). Routes to safety: Protection issues facing abused women and children and the role of outreach services. Bristol, UK: Women’s Aid.
33.
HumphreysC.ThiaraR. (2003). Neither justice nor protection: Women’s experiences of post-separation violence. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 25, 195-214.
34.
HuntJ.MacleodA. (2008). Outcomes of applications to court for contact orders after parental separation or divorce. London, England: Ministry of Justice.
35.
HunterR.BarnettA. (2013). Fact-finding hearings and the implementation of Practice Direction 12J. Family Law, 43, 431-437.
36.
JaffeP. G.WolfeD. A.WilsonS. (1990). Children of battered women. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
LaderD. (2008). Omnibus Survey Report No. 38: Non-resident parental contact, 2007/8-a report on research using the national statistics omnibus survey produced on behalf of the ministry of justice and the department for children, schools and families. Newport, UK: Office for National Statistics.
38.
Ministry of Justice. (2011). Judicial and court statistics 2010. London, England: Author.
39.
Mirrlees-BlackC. (1999). Domestic violence: Findings from a new British Crime Survey self-completion questionnaire (Home Office Research Study No. 191). London, England: Home Office.
40.
National Association of Probation Officers. (2002). Contact, separation and the work of family court staff. London, England: Author.
41.
NazrooJ. (1999). Uncovering gender differences in the use of marital violence: The effect of methodology. In AllanG. (Ed.), The sociology of the family (pp. 149-168). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
42.
PryorJ.RodgersB. (2001). Children in changing families: Life after parental separation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Press.
43.
RadfordL.Aid for Mothers Involved in Contact Action [AMICA]. (1999). Unreasonable fears? Child contact in the context of domestic violence: A survey of mother’s perceptions of harm. Bristol, UK: Women’s Aid.
44.
RederP.DuncanS. (1999). Lost innocents: A follow-up study of fatal child abuse. London, England: Routledge.
RichardsL. (2003). Findings from the multi-agency domestic violence murder reviews in London. London, England: Metropolitan Police.
47.
RitchieJ. (2003). The applications of qualitative research methods. In RitchieJ.LewisJ. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 24-46). London, England: Sage.
48.
RoseW.BarnesJ. (2008). Improving safeguarding practice: Study of serious case reviews 2001-2003 (Research Report DCSF-RR022). Nottingham, UK: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
49.
SaundersD. G. (1988). Wife abuse, husband abuse, or mutual combat? In YlloK.BogradM. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 90-113). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50.
SaundersH. (2001). Making contact worse? Report of a national survey of domestic violence refuge services into the enforcement of contact orders. Bristol, UK: Women’s Aid Federation England.
51.
SaundersH. (2004). Twenty-nine child homicides: Lessons still to be learnt on domestic violence and child protection. Bristol, UK: Women’s Aid Federation England.
52.
SaundersH.BarronJ. (2003). Failure to protect? Domestic violence and the experiences of abused women and children in the family courts. Bristol, UK: Women’s Aid Federation England.
53.
SinclairR.BullockR. (2002). Learning from past experience: A review of serious case reviews. London, England: Department of Health.
54.
SmartC.MayV.WadeA.FurnissC. (2003). Residence and contact disputes in court: Volume 1 (DCA Research Series 6/03). London, England: Department for Constitutional Affairs.
55.
SmartC.MayV.WadeA.FurnissC. (2005). Residence and contact disputes in court: Volume 2 (DCA Research Series 4/05). London, England: Department for Constitutional Affairs.
56.
SmartC.NealeB. (1999). Family fragments?Oxford, UK: Polity Press.
57.
StanleyN.MillerP.Richardson FosterH.ThomsonG. (2010). A stop–start response: Social services, interventions with children and families notified following domestic violence incidents. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1-18.
58.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
59.
StarkE.FlitcraftA. (1988). Women and children at risk: A feminist perspective on child abuse. International Journal of Health Services, 18, 97-118.
60.
SturgeC.GlaserD. (2000). Contact and domestic violence—The experts’ court report. Family Law, 30, 615-629.
61.
ThiaraR. K.GillA. (2012). Domestic violence, child contact, post-separation violence: Issues for South Asian and African-Caribbean women and children: A report of findings. London, England: NSPCC.
62.
TrinderL.ConnollyJ.KellettJ.NotleyC. (2005). A profile of applicants and respondents in contact cases in Essex (DCA Research Series 1/05). London, England: Department for Constitutional Affairs.
63.
TrinderL.FirthA.JenksC. (2009). Opening closed doors: A micro analytic investigation of dispute resolution in child contact cases (ESRC End of Award Report, RES-000-22-2646). Swindon, UK: ESRC.
64.
TrinderL.KellettJ.ConnollyJ.NotleyC.SwiftL. (2006). Making contact happen or making contact work? The process and outcomes of in-court conciliation. London, England: Department for Constitutional Affairs.
65.
WalbyS.AllenJ. (2004). Domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey (Home Office Research Study 276). London, England: Home Office.
66.
WestmarlandN.HesterM. (2007). Time for change: An assessment of services for domestic abuse perpetrators in Bristol. Bristol, UK: University of Bristol.
67.
WilsonM.DalyM. (2002). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
68.
WolfeD.CrooksC. V.LeeV.McIntyre-SmithA.JaffeP. G. (2003). The effects of children’s exposure to domestic violence: A meta-analysis and critique. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 6, 171-187.
