Intimate partner violence (IPV) has been shown to have considerable effects on women’s employment and health. The purpose of this study was to examine work-related IPV, acculturation, and socioeconomic status (SES) among Latinos enrolled in batterer intervention programs. Findings indicate that 55% of men interfered with their partner’s ability to get to their work, to do their work, and to maintain their job. Positive relationships between acculturation and work-related IPV were observed, and some support was found for a moderating role of SES. Implications for employers and for the conceptualization of violence against women in an employment context are discussed.
Balls OrganistaP.OrganistaK.KurasakiK. (2003). The relationship between acculturation and ethnic minority mental health. In ChunK.OrganistaP. B.MarínG. (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research (pp. 139-161). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3.
BerryJ. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5-68.
4.
BreidingM. L.BlackM. C.RyanG. W. (2008). Prevalence and risk factors of intimate partner violence in eighteen U.S. states/territories, 2005. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34, 112-118.
5.
BrownwellP. (1996). Domestic violence in the workplace: An emergent issue. Crisis Intervention, 3, 129-141.
6.
BrushL. D. (2000). Battering, traumatic stress, and welfare-to-work transition. Violence Against Women, 6, 1039-1065.
7.
BrushL. D. (2011). Poverty, battered women, and work in U.S. public policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2006). Survey of workplace violence prevention, 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osnr0026.pdf
CabassaL. J. (2003). Measuring acculturation: Where we are and where we need to go. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25, 127-146.
11.
CaetanoR. C.FieldC. A.Ramisetty-MiklerS.McGrathC. (2005). The 5-year course of intimate partner violence among White, Black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1039-1057.
12.
CaetanoR. C.SchaferJ.ClarkC. L.CunradiC. B.RaspberryK. (2000). Intimate partner violence, acculturation, and alcohol consumption among Hispanic couples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 30-45.
13.
ChampionJ. D. (1996). Woman abuse, assimilation, and self-concept in a rural Mexican American community. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18, 508-521.
14.
ChunK. M.AkutsuP. D. (2003). Acculturation among ethnic minority families. In ChunK. M.OrganistaP. B.MarínG. (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research (pp. 95-119). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15.
CunradiC. B.CaetanoR.SchaferJ. (2002). Socioeconomic predictors of intimate partner violence among White, Black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. Journal of Family Violence, 17, 377-389.
16.
FirestoneJ. M.LambertL. C.VegaW. A. (1999). Intimate violence among Mexican origin women: Correlates of abuse. Journal of Gender, Culture, and Health, 4, 119-134.
17.
FitzgeraldS.DienenemannJ.CadoretteM. F. (1998). Domestic violence in the workplace. American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal, 46, 345-353.
18.
GalvezG.MankowskiE. S.BraunM. F.GlassN. (2009). Development of an iPod audio computer-assisted self-interview to increase the representation of low literacy populations in survey research. Field Methods, 21, 407-415.
19.
GalvezG.MankowskiE. S.McGladeM. S.RuizM. E.GlassN. (2011). Work-related intimate partner violence among employed immigrants from Mexico. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 12, 230-246.
20.
GarciaL.HurwitzE. L.KrausJ. F. (2005). Acculturation and reported intimate partner violence among Latinas in Los Angeles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 569-590.
21.
GellesR. J. (1985). Family violence. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 347-367.
22.
GlassN.BloomT.PerrinN.AngerW. K. (2010). A computer-based training intervention for work supervisors to respond to intimate partner violence. Safety and Health at Work, 1, 167-174.
23.
González-GuardaR. M.PeragalloN.VasquezE. P.UrrutiaM. T.MitraniV. B. (2009). Intimate partner violence, depression, and resource availability among a community sample of Hispanic women. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 30, 227-236.
24.
GrzywaczJ. G.RaoP.GentryA.MarínA.ArcuryT. A. (2009). Acculturation and conflict in Mexican immigrants’ intimate partnerships: The role of women’s labor force participation. Violence Against Women, 15, 1194-1212.
25.
HarrisR. J.FirestoneJ. M.VegaW. A. (2005). The interaction of country of origin, acculturation, and gender role ideology on wife abuse. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 463-483.
26.
IngramE. M. (2007). A comparison of help seeking between Latino and non-Latino victims of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 13, 159-171.
27.
JasinskiJ. L. (1998). The role of acculturation in wife assault. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 20, 175-191.
28.
KantorG. K.JasinskiJ. L.AldorondoE. (1994). Sociocultural status and incidents of marital violence in Latino families. Violence and Victims, 9, 207-222.
29.
KasturiranganA.KrishnanS.RigerS. (2004). The impact of culture and minority status on women’s experience of domestic violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5, 318-332.
30.
KlevensJ. (2007). An overview of intimate partner violence among Latinos. Violence Against Women, 13, 111-122.
31.
LoganT. K.ShannonL.ColeJ.SwanbergJ. (2007). Partner stalking and implications for women’s employment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 268-291.
32.
MankowskiE. S.GalvezG.PerrinN. A.HansonG. C.GlassN. (2013). Patterns of work-related intimate partner violence and job performance among abusive men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 3041-3058.
33.
MarínG. (1992). Issues in the measurement of acculturation among Hispanics. In GeisingerK. F. (Ed.), APA Science Volumes Series: Psychological testing of Hispanics (pp. 235-251). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34.
MarínG.GambaR. J. (2003). Acculturation and changes in cultural values. In ChunK. M.OrganistaP. B.MarínG. (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement and applied research (pp. 83-89). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35.
MarínG.Marín VanOssB. (1991). Research with Hispanic populations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
MarínG.SabogalF.MarínF. V.Otero-SabogalR.Perez-StableE. (1987). Development of a Short Acculturation Scale for Hispanics. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9, 183-205.
37.
MightyE. J. (1997). Conceptualizing family violence as a workplace issue: A framework for research and practice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 10, 249-262.
38.
MorashM.BuiH. N.SantiagoA. M. (2000). Cultural-specific gender ideology and wife abuse in Mexican-descent families. International Journal of Victimology, 7, 67-91.
39.
NegyC.WoodsD. J. (1992). A note on the relationship between acculturation and socioeconomic status. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 14, 248-251.
40.
PearlmanD. N.ZierlerS.GjelsvikA.Verhoek-OftedahlW. (2003). Neighborhood environment, racial position, and risk of police reported domestic violence: A contextual analysis. Public Health Reports, 118, 44-58.
41.
PerillaJ. L.BakemanR.NorrisF. H. (1994). Culture and domestic violence: The ecology of abused Latinas. Violence and Victims, 9, 325-339.
PostmusJ. L.PlummerS. B.McMahonS.MurshidN. S.KimM. S. (2012). Understanding economic abuse in the lives of survivors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 411-430.
44.
RamirezR. R.delaCruzG. P. (2003). The Hispanic population in the United States: March 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
RigerS.AhrensC.BlickenstaffA. (2000). Measuring interference with employment and education reported by women with abusive partners: Preliminary data. Violence and Victims, 15, 161-172.
47.
RothmanE. F.CorsoP. S. (2008). Propensity for intimate partner abuse and workplace productivity: Why employers should care. Violence Against Women, 14, 1054-1064.
48.
RothmanE. F.HathawayJ.StidsenA.de VriesH. (2007). How employment helps female victims of intimate partner violence: A qualitative study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 136-143.
49.
RothmanE. F.PerryM. J. (2004). Intimate partner abuse perpetrated by employees. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9, 238-246.
50.
SabinaC.CuevasC. A.SchallyJ. L. (2013). The effect of immigration and acculturation on victimization among a national sample of Latino women. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19, 13-26.
51.
SabogalF.MarínG.Otero-SabogalR.MarínB. V.Perez-StableE. J. (1987). Hispanic familism and acculturation: What changes and what doesn’t?Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9, 397-412.
52.
SamuelL. J.TudorC.WeinsteinM.MossH.GlassN. (2011). Employers’ perceptions of intimate partner violence among a diverse workforce. Safety and Health at Work, 2, 250-259.
53.
ShepardM.PenceE. (1988). The effects of battering on employment status of women. Affilia, 3, 55-61.
54.
SorensonS. B.TellesC. A. (1991). Self-reports of spousal violence in a Mexican American and non-Hispanic White population. Violence and Victims, 6, 3-16.
55.
StrausM. A.SmithC. (1995). Violence in Latino families in the United States: Incidence rates and structural interpretations. In StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 341-367). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
56.
SugiharaY.WarnerJ. A. (2002). Dominance and domestic abuse among Mexican Americans: Gender differences in the etiology of violence in intimate relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 17, 315-340.
57.
SwanbergJ. E.LoganT. K.MackeC. (2005). Intimate partner violence, employment, and the workplace: Consequences and future directions. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 6, 286-312.
58.
SwanbergJ. E.MackeC. (2006). Intimate partner violence and the workplace: Consequences and disclosure. Affilia, 21, 391-406.
59.
SzinovaczM. E.EgleyL. C. (1995). Comparing one-partner and couple data on sensitive marital behaviors: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 995-1010.
60.
TaylorM. J.BaruschA. S. (2004). Personal, family, and multiple barriers of long-term welfare recipients. Social Work, 49, 175-183.
61.
TiesmanH. M.GurkaK. K.KondaS.CobenJ. H.AmandusH. E. (2012). Workplace homicides among US women: The role of intimate partner violence. Annals of Epidemiology, 22, 277-284.
62.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142-161.
63.
TolmanR. M.RosenD. (2001). Domestic violence in the lives of women receiving welfare: Mental health, substance dependence, and economic well-being. Violence Against Women, 7, 141-158.
64.
TolmanR. M.WangH. (2005). Domestic violence and women’s employment: Fixed effects models of three waves of women’s employment study data. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 147-158.
65.
TorresS. (1991). A comparison of wife abuse between two cultures: Perceptions, attitudes, nature, and extent. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 12, 113-131.
ValdésL. F.BarónA.PonceF. Q. (1987). Counseling Hispanic men. In ScherM.StevensM.GoodG.EichenfieldG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with men (pp. 203–217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.
YraguiN. L.MankowskiE. S.PerrinN. A.GlassN. E. (2012). Dimensions of support among abused women in the workplace. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49(1-2), 31-42.
