This article examines the British media’s construction of forced marriage (FM) as an urgent social problem in a context where other forms of violence against women are not similarly problematized. A detailed analysis of four British newspapers over a 10-year period demonstrates that media reporting of FM constitutes a moral panic in that it is constructed as a cultural problem that threatens Britain’s social order rather than as a specific form of violence against women. Thus, the current problematization of FM restricts discursive spaces for policy debates and hinders attempts to respond to this problem as part of broader efforts to tackle violence against women.
AliS. (2008). Belonging. London, England: John Murray.
3.
AnithaS.GillA. (2009). Coercion, consent and the forced marriage debate in the UK. Feminist Legal Studies, 17, 165-184.
4.
AnthiasF. (2013). The tropes of “diversity” governmentality: A significant face of contemporary racisms. Paper presented at University of Roehampton, March 2013. London, England.
BenedictH. (1992). Virgin or vamp: How the press covers sex crimes. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
BernsN. (2004). Framing the victim: Domestic violence, media and social problems. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
10.
BlunkettD. (2007, August8). End arranged marriages to unite Britain. The Sun.
11.
BredalA. (2005). Arranged marriages as a multicultural battle field. In Mette-AnderesonM.LithmanY.SernhedeO. (Eds.), Youth, otherness, and the plural city: Modes of belonging and social life (pp. 75–106). Gothenburg, Sweden: Daidalos.
12.
BredalA. (2011). Border control to prevent forced marriages: Choosing between protecting the women and protecting the nation. In GillA.AnithaS. (Eds.), Forced marriage, Introducing a social justice and human rights perspective (pp. 90-112). London, England: Zed Books.
CohenS. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics. London, England: MacGibbon & Kee.
15.
CohenS. (2002). Moral panics as cultural politics. In CohenS. (Ed.), Folk devils and moral panics (3rd ed., pp. vii-xxxvii). London, England: Routledge.
16.
CohenS. (2011). Whose side are we on? The undeclared politics of moral panic theory. Crime Media Culture, 7, 237-243.
17.
CohenS.YoungJ. (Eds.). (1973). The manufacture of news. London, England: Constable.
18.
CoyM.LovettJ.KellyL. (2008). Realising rights, fulfilling obligations: A template for an integrated strategy on violence against women for the UK. London, England: End Violence Against Women.
19.
CritcherC. (2003). Moral panics and the media. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
20.
CritcherC. (2009). Widening the focus: Moral panics as moral regulation. British Journal of Criminology, 49, 9-30.
CummingP. (2009, May26). Children’s rights, children’s voices, children’s technology, children’s sexuality. Congress of the humanities and social sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.yorku.ca/cummingp/research.html
FoucaultM. (1985). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality (Vol. 2.). London, England: Penguin.
30.
FoucaultM. (2000). Polemics, politics and problematizations: An interview with Michel Foucault. In RabinowP. (Ed.), Essential works of Michel Foucault 1954-84. Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (Vol. 1, pp. 111-120). London, England: Penguin.
31.
FranklinB. (Ed.). (1999). Social policy, the media and misrepresentation. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
32.
GarlandD. (2008). On the concept of moral panic. Crime Media Culture, 4, 9-30.
33.
GauntlettD. (1998). Ten things wrong with the media “effects” model. In DickinsonR.HarindranathR.LinnéO. (Eds.), Approaches to audiences: A reader (pp. 120-30). London, England: Arnold.
34.
GedalofI. (2007). Unhomely homes: Women, family and belonging in UK discourses of migration and asylum. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33, 77-94.
HallS. (1978). Policing the crisis: Mugging, the state and law and order. London, England: Macmillan.
37.
HastingsM. (2005, March22). Immigration. Daily Mail, p. 12.
38.
HesterM.ChantlerK.GangoliG.AhmedB.BurmanE.SharmaS.. (2006). Forced marriage: The risk factors and the effect of raising the minimum age for a sponsor, and of leave to enter the UK as a spouse or fiance(e). Bristol, UK: University of Bristol.
39.
HM Government. (2008). Multi-agency practice guidelines: Handling cases of forced marriage. London, England: Forced Marriage Unit.
40.
KazimirskiA.KeoghP.SmithR.GowlandS. (2009). Forced marriage: Prevalence and service response. London, England: Natcen.
41.
KhanumN. (2008). Forced marriage, family cohesion and community engagement. Luton, UK: Equality in Diversity.
42.
LumbyC.FunnellN. (2011). Between heat and light: The opportunity in moral panics. Crime Media Culture, 7, 277-291.
43.
LyonsJ. (2008, February10). 17,500 forced to wed. The News of the World.
NarayanU. (1997). Dislocating cultures: Identities, traditions, and third-world feminism. New York: Routledge.
51.
PeeloM.FrancisB.SoothillK.PearsonJ.AckerleyE. (2004). Newspaper reporting and the public construction of homicide. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 256-275.
52.
RazackS. (2004). Imperilled Muslim women, dangerous Muslim men and civilised Europeans: Legal and social responses to forced marriages. Feminist Legal Studies, 1, 256-275.
53.
ReeseS. (2001). Prologue-framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In ReeseS. D.GandyH.Jr.GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 7-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
ReinerR.LivingstoneS.AllenJ. (2003). From law and order to lynch mobs: Crime news since the Second World War. In MasonP. (Ed.), Criminal visions: Media representations of crime and justice (pp. 13-32). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
55.
RochefortD.CobbR. (Eds.), (1994). The politics of problem definition. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
56.
RohloffA. (2008). Moral panics as decivilising processes: Towards an Eliasian approach. New Zealand Sociology, 23, 66-76.
57.
Rude-AntoineE. (2005). Forced marriages in Council of Europe member states: A comparative study of legislation and political initiatives. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
WinterB.ThompsonD.JeffreysS. (2002). The UN approach to harmful traditional practices. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 4, 72-94.
70.
WosniakJ. A.McCloskeyK. A. (2010). Fact or fiction? Gender issues related to newspaper reports of intimate partner homicide. Violence Against Women, 16, 934-952.
71.
YeoC. (2009). Raising the spouse visa age. Journal of Immigration Asylum and Nationality Law, 23, 365-370.
72.
YoungJ. (1971). The role of the police as amplifiers of deviance. In CohenS. (Ed.), Images of deviance (pp. 27-61). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
73.
Yuval-DavisN. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13, 193-209.
