We used qualitative methodologies to understand perceptions regarding options available for victims of physical intimate partner violence (IPV) in northern India. We interviewed male and female community members along with IPV experts. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using grounded theory. Participants emphasized that a victim of physical IPV should bear the violence, modify her husbands’ behaviors, or seek help from her natal family. Accessing external resources such as the police or nongovernmental organizations was viewed as both socially inappropriate and infeasible. These results have widespread implications and lay the foundation for the development of IPV prevention initiatives in India.
Action Research and Training for Health (ARTH). (2010). [Data on project villages]. Unpublished data.
2.
Ahmed-GhoshH. (2004). Chattels of society: Domestic violence in India. Violence Against Women, 10, 94-118. doi:10.1177/1077801203256019
3.
BhatA.SenA.PradhanU. (2005). Child marriages and the law in India. New Delhi, India: Human Rights Law Network.
4.
CampbellJ. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet, 359, 1331-1336. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08336-8
5.
CharsleyS. R.KaranthG. K. (1998). Challenging untouchability: Dalit initiative and experience from Karnataka. New Delhi, India: Sage.
6.
ChowdhryP. (2004). Caste panchayats and the policing of marriage in Haryana: Enforcing kinship and territorial exogamy. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 38(1-2), 1-42. doi:10.1177/006996670403800102
7.
DalalK.LeeM. S.GiffordM. (2012). Male adolescents’ attitudes toward wife beating: A multi-country study in South Asia. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50, 437-442. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.09.012
8.
Garcia-MorenoC.JansenH. A.EllsbergM.HeiseL.WattsC. (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
9.
GoV. F.JohnsonS. C.BentleyM. E.SivaramS.SrikrishnanA. K.CelentanoD. D.SolomonS. (2003). Crossing the threshold: Engendered definitions of socially acceptable domestic violence in Chennai, India. Culture, Health, & Sexuality, 5, 393-408. doi:10.1080/136910501164119
10.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs. (2011). Census of India. New Delhi, India. Available from http://censusindia.gov.in/
11.
GroverS. (2011). “Purani aur nai shaadi”: Separation, divorce, and remarriage in the lives of the urban poor in New Delhi. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 17(1), 67-99.
12.
GuestG.BunceA.JohnsonL. (2006). How many interviews are enough: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59-82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903
HeiseL.EllsbergM.GottemoellerM. (1999). Ending violence against women (Population Reports, Series L. No. 11). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Population Information Program.
15.
HeiseL.Garcia-MorenoC. (2002). Violence by intimate partners. In KrugE. G.DahlbergL. L.MercyJ. A.ZwiA. B.LozanoR. (Eds.), World report on violence and health (pp. 87-121). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/9241545615.pdf
16.
KishorS.GuptaK. (2009). Gender equality and women’s empowerment in India. In National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), India, 2005-2006. Mumbai, India: International Institute of Population Sciences.
17.
KrishnanS. (2005). Do structural inequalities contribute to marital violence? Ethnographic evidence from rural south India. Violence Against Women, 11, 759-775. doi:10.1177/1077801205276078
18.
KrishnarajM. (2007). Understanding violence against women. Economic & Political Weekly, 42(44), 90-91.
19.
LopezG. I.FigueroaM.ConnorS. E.MaliskiS. L. (2008). Translation barriers in conducting qualitative research with Spanish speakers. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 1729-1737. doi:10.1177/1049732308325857
20.
MagarV. (2003). Empowerment approaches to gender-based violence: Women’s courts in Delhi slums. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26, 509-523. doi:10.1016/j/wsif.2003.09.006
21.
MalterudK. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 358, 483-488. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6
22.
MartinS. L.MoraccoK. E.GarroJ.TsuiA. O.KupperL.ChaseJ. L.. (2002). Domestic violence across generations: Findings from northern India. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 560-572. doi:10.1093/ije/31.3.560
23.
MathurK. (2004). Countering gender violence: Initiatives towards collective action in Rajasthan. New Delhi, India: Sage.
NairM. K.LeenaM. L.GeorgeB.SunithaR. M.PrasannaG. L.RussellP. S. (2012). A panchayat level primary-care approach for adolescent services. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 79 (Suppl. 1), s6-s10. doi:10.1007/s12098-011-0454-5
26.
PanchanadeswaranS.KoverolaC. (2005). The voices of battered women in India. Violence Against Women, 11, 736-758. doi:10.1177/1077801205276088
27.
PronykP. M.HargreavesJ. R.KimJ. C.MorisonL. A.PhetlaG.WattsC.. (2006). Effect of a structural intervention for the prevention of intimate-partner violence and HIV in rural South Africa: A cluster randomised trial. The Lancet, 368, 1973-1983. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69744-4
28.
RagavanM. I.IyengarK.WurtzR. M. (2014). Physical intimate partner violence in northern India. Qualitative Health Research, 24(4), 457-473.
29.
RaniM.BonuS. (2009). Attitudes toward wife beating: A cross-country study in Asia. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 1371-1397. doi:10.1177/0886260508322182
30.
RastogiM.TherlyP. (2006). Dowry and its link to violence against women in India. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 7, 66-77. doi:10.1177/1524838005283927
31.
SchulerS. R.BatesL. M.IslamF. (2008). Women’s rights, domestic violence, and recourse seeking in rural Bangladesh. Violence Against Women, 14, 326-345. doi:10.1177/1077801207313970
32.
StarksH.TrinidadS. B. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1372-1380. doi:10.1177/1049732307307031
33.
StoverC. S.MeadowsA. L.KaufmanJ. (2009). Interventions for intimate partner violence: Review and implications for evidence-based practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 223-233. doi:10.1037/a0012718
34.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
TichyL. L.BeckerJ. V.SiscoM. M. (2009). The downside of patriarchal benevolence: Ambivalence in addressing domestic violence and socio-economic considerations for women of Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 547-558. doi:10.1007/s10896-009-9253-4
36.
UlinP. R.RobinsonE. T.TolleyE. E. (2005). Qualitative methods in public health: A field guide for applied research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37.
VisariaL. (2008). Violence against women in India: Is empowerment a protective factor. Economic & Political Weekly, 43(48), 60-66.
38.
WalkerL. E. (2009). The battered woman syndrome (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.
39.
World Health Organization. (2001). Putting women first: Ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence against women. Geneva, Switzerland: Author. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/gender/violence/womenfirtseng.pdf
