We examined the association between neighborhood-level factors and intimate partner femicide (IPF) using Wisconsin Violent Death Reporting System (WVDRS) data and Wisconsin Coalition Against Domestic Violence (WCADV) reports, in concert with neighborhood-level information. After controlling for individual characteristics, neighborhood-level disadvantage was associated with a decreased likelihood of IPF status, as compared with other femicides, whereas neighborhood-level residential instability was associated with an increased likelihood of IPF status. Neighborhood plays a role in differentiating IPFs from other femicides in our study area. Our findings demonstrate the importance of multilevel strategies for understanding and reducing the burden of intimate partner violence.
AlhabibS.NurU.JonesR. (2010). Domestic violence against women: Systematic review of prevalence studies. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 369-382.
2.
BensonM. L.FoxG. L.DeMarisA.Van WykJ. (2003). Neighborhood disadvantage, individual economic distress and violence against women in intimate relationships. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 207-235.
3.
BensonM. L.WooldredgeJ.ThistlethwaiteA. B.FoxG. L. (2004). The correlation between race and domestic violence is confounded with community context. Social Problems, 51, 326-342.
4.
BrowningC. R. (2002). The span of collective efficacy: Extending social disorganization theory to partner violence. Journal of Marriage & Family, 64, 833-850.
5.
BurkeJ. G.O’CampoP.PeakG. L. (2006). Neighborhood influences and intimate partner violence: Does geographic setting matter?Journal of Urban Health, 83, 182-194.
6.
CampbellJ. C.GlassN.SharpsP. W.LaughonK.BloomT. (2007). Intimate partner homicide: Review and implications of research and policy. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8, 246-269.
7.
CampbellJ. C.WebsterD.Koziol-McLainJ.BlockC.CampbellD.CurryM. A.. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089-1097.
CunradiC. B. (2010). Neighborhoods, alcohol outlets and intimate partner violence: Addressing research gaps in explanatory mechanisms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7, 799-813.
10.
CunradiC. B.CaetanoR.ClarkC.SchaferJ. (2000). Neighborhood poverty as a predictor of intimate partner violence among White, Black, and Hispanic couples in the United States: A multilevel analysis. Annals of Epidemiology, 10, 297-308.
11.
FlowerdewR.ManleyD. J.SabelC. E. (2008). Neighbourhood effects on health: Does it matter where you draw the boundaries?Social Science & Medicine, 66, 1241-1255.
12.
FoxG. L.BensonM. L. (2006). Household and neighborhood contexts of intimate partner violence. Public Health Reports, 121, 419-427.
13.
FryeV.GaleaS.TracyM.BucciarelliA.PutnamS.WiltS. (2008). The role of neighborhood environment and risk of intimate partner femicide in a large urban area. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1473-1479.
14.
HosmerD. W.LemeshowS. (1989). Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley.
15.
JonesA. S.GielenA. C.CampbellJ. C.SchollenbergerJ.DienemannJ.KubJ.. (1999). Annual and lifetime prevalence of partner abuse in a sample of female HMO enrollees. Women’s Health Issues, 9, 295-305.
16.
KramerA.LorenzonD.MuellerG. (2004). Prevalence of intimate partner violence and health implications for women using emergency departments and primary care clinics. Women’s Health Issues, 14, 19-29.
17.
LanierC.MaumeM. O. (2009). Intimate partner violence and social isolation across the rural/urban divide. Violence Against Women, 15, 1311-1330.
18.
LiQ.KirbyR. S.SiglerR. T.HwangS. S.LaGoryM. E.GoldenbergR. L. (2010). A multilevel analysis of individual, household, and neighborhood correlates of intimate partner violence among low-income pregnant women in Jefferson County, Alabama. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 531-539.
19.
MadkourA. S.MartinS. L.HalpernC. T.SchoenbachV. J. (2010). Area disadvantage and intimate partner homicide: An ecological analysis of North Carolina counties, 2004-2006. Violence and Victims, 25, 363-377.
20.
Miles-DoanR. (1998). Violence between spouses and intimates: Does neighborhood context matter?Social Forces, 77, 623-645.
21.
Miles-DoanR.KellyS. (1997). Geographic concentration of violence between intimate partners. Public Health Reports, 112, 135-141.
22.
O’CampoP.BurkeJ.PeakG. L.McDonnellK. A.GielenA. C. (2005). Uncovering neighbourhood influences on intimate partner violence using concept mapping. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 59, 603-608.
23.
O’CampoP.GielenA. C.FadenR. R.XueX.KassN.WangM. C. (1995). Violence by male partners against women during the childbearing year: A contextual analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 1092-1097.
24.
Peek-AsaC.WallisA.HarlandK.BeyerK.DickeyP.SaftlasA. (2011). Rural disparity in domestic violence prevalence and access to resources. Journal of Women’s Health, 20, 1743-1749.
25.
RaghavanC.MennerichA.SextonE.JamesS. E. (2006). Community violence and its direct, indirect, and mediating effects on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 1132-1149.
26.
SampsonR. J.GrovesW. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774-802.
