This qualitative study investigates the discourses that men used when talking about their experiences of attending a Duluth–cognitive-behavioral-therapy (CBT) domestic violence program in Cape Town, South Africa. Data were collected from 12 men who were recruited from three programs. A discourse analysis of interviews revealed that men drew upon various dominant discourses of masculinity that may reinforce the subordination of, control over, and violence against women. Our findings from this study contribute to the debate surrounding the Duluth model’s effectiveness in South Africa by questioning its successes in transforming violent masculinity.
AbrahamsN.JewkesR. (2005). Effects of South African men’s having witnessed abuse of their mothers during childhood on their levels of violence in adulthood. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1811-1816.
2.
AbrahamsN.JewkesR.LaubscherR.HoffmanM. (2006). Intimate partner violence: Prevalence and risk factors for men in Cape Town, South Africa. Violence and Victims, 21, 247-264.
3.
AdamsP. J.TownsA.GaveyN. (1995). Dominance and entitlement: The rhetoric men use to discuss their violence towards women. Discourse & Society, 6, 387-406.
4.
AdhikariM. (2005). Not White enough, not Black enough: Racial identity on the South African Coloured community. Cape Town, South Africa: Double Storey Books.
5.
Ahmed-GhoshH. (2004). Chattels of society: Domestic violence in India. Violence Against Women, 10, 94-118.
6.
AlmeidaR. V.LockardJ. (2005). The cultural context model: A new paradigm for accountability, empowerment, and the development of critical consciousness against domestic violence. In SokoloffN. J.PrattC. (Eds.), Domestic violence at the margins: Readings on race, class, gender, and culture (pp. 301-320). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
7.
AltbekerA. (2007). A country at war with itself: South Africa’s crisis of crime. Johannesburg, South Africa: Jonathan Ball Publishers.
8.
AndersonK. L.UmbersonD. (2001). Gendering violence: Masculinity and power in men’s accounts of domestic violence. Gender & Society, 15, 358-380.
9.
BabcockJ. C.GreenC. E.RobieC. (2004). Does batterer’s treatment work? A meta-analytic view of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023-1053.
10.
BabcockJ. C.SteinerR. (1999). The relationship between treatment, incarceration, and recidivism of battering: A program evaluation of Seattle’s coordinated community response to domestic violence. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 46-59.
11.
BennettL. W.StoopsC.CallC.FlettH. (2007). Program completion and re-arrest in a batterer intervention system. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 42-54.
12.
BogradM. (1990). Introduction. In YllöK.BogradM. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 11-27). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
BollenS.ArtzL.VettenL.LouwA. (1999). Violence against women in metropolitan South Africa: A study on impact and service delivery. Pretoria, South Africa: Institute for Security Studies.
14.
BoonzaierF. (2005). The relational construction of woman abuse: Narratives of gender, subjectivity and violence in South Africa (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cape Town, South Africa.
15.
BoonzaierF.de la ReyC. (2004). Woman abuse: The construction of gender in women and men’s narratives of violence. South African Journal of Psychology, 34, 443-463.
16.
BoonzaierF.SheferT. (2006). Gendered research. In SheferT.BoonzaierF.KiguwaP. (Eds.), The gender of psychology (pp. 3-11). Cape Town, South Africa: University of Cape Town Press.
17.
BrownM. P.HendricksJ. E. (1998). Wife abuse. In JacksonN. A.OatesG. C. (Eds.), Violence in intimate relationships: Examining sociological and psychological issues (pp. 119-136). Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
18.
BurmanE. (1994). Interviewing. In BanisterP.BurmanE.ParkerI.TaylorM.TindallC. (Eds.), Qualitative methods on psychology: A research guide (pp. 49-71). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
19.
ButtellF. P.CarneyM. M. (2004). A multidimensional assessment of a batterer intervention program: An alert to a problem?Research on Social Work Practice, 14, 93-101.
20.
CavanaghK.DobashR. E.DobashR. P.LewisR. (2001). “Remedial work”: Men’s strategic responses to their violence against intimate female partners. Sociology, 35, 695-714.
21.
CokerD. (2005). Shifting power for battered women: Law, material resources, and poor women of color. In SokoloffN. J.PrattC. (Eds.), Domestic violence at the margins: Readings on race, class, gender, and culture (pp. 369-388). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
22.
De la HarpeK.BoonzaierF. (2011). Women’s experiences of an intervention for violent men. South African Journal of Psychology, 41, 147-156.
23.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. London, England: Open Books.
DouglasU.BathrickD.PerryP. A. (2008). Deconstructing male violence against women: The men stopping violence community-accountability model. Violence Against Women, 14, 247-261.
26.
DuttonD. G.CorvoK. (2006). Transforming a flawed policy: A call to revive psychology and science in domestic violence research and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 457-483.
27.
DuttonD.SonkinD. J. (2003). Introduction: Perspectives on the treatment of intimate violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 7, 1-6.
28.
EdlesonJ. L.SyersM. (1990). Relative effectiveness of group treatments for men who batter. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 26, 10-18.
29.
EdlesonJ. L.TolmanR. M. (1992). Interventions for men who batter: An ecological approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
EpsteinD. (1998). Marked men: Whiteness and masculinity. Agenda, 37, 49-59.
31.
GaddD.JeffersonT. (2007). Psychosocial criminology: An introduction. London, England: Sage.
32.
Garcia-MorenoC.JansenH.EllsbergM.HeiseL.WattsC. (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: Initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
33.
GaveyN. (1997). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis. In GergenM.DavisS. (Eds.), Toward a new psychology of gender (pp. 49-64). New York: Routledge.
34.
GondolfE. W. (2008). Program completion in specialized batterer counseling for African American men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 94-116.
35.
HarrisE.LeaS.FosterD. (1995). The construction of gender: An analysis of men’s talk on gender. South African Journal of Psychology, 25, 175-183.
JewkesR.MorrellR. (2010). Gender and sexuality: Emerging perspectives from the heterosexual epidemic in South Africa and implications for HIV risk and prevention. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 13, 1-11.
38.
KurianK. M.WechsbergW. M.LusenoW. K. (2009). Exploring the differences and similarities between Black/African and Coloured men regarding violence against women, substance abuse, and HIV risks in Cape Town, South Africa. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 10, 13-29.
39.
MathewsS.AbrahamsN.MartinL. J.VettenL.van der MerweL.JewkesR. (2004). “Every six hours a woman is killed by her intimate partner”: A national study of female homicide in South Africa (Medical Research Council Policy Brief). Available from http://www.mrc.ac.za
40.
MatzopoulosR.NormanR.BradshawD. (2004). The burden of injury in South Africa: Fatal injury trends and international comparisons. In SufflaS.van NiekerkA.DuncanN. (Eds.), Crime, violence and injury prevention in South Africa: Developments and challenges (pp. 9-21). Tygerberg, South Africa: Medial Research Council, University of South Africa Crime, Violence and Injury Lead Programme. Available from www.mrc.ac.za
41.
MorrellR. (2001). The times of change: Men and masculinity in South Africa. In MorrellR. (Ed.), Changing men in Southern Africa (pp. 3-33). London, England: University of Natal Press.
42.
O’NeillD. (1998). A poststructuralist review of the theoretical literature surrounding wife abuse. Violence Against Women, 4, 457-491.
RichJ. A.GreyC. M. (2005). Pathways to recurrent trauma among young Black men: Traumatic stress, substance use, and the “code of the street.”American Journal of Public Health, 95, 816-826.
45.
SantanaM. C.RajA.DeckerM. R.La MarcheA.SilvermanJ. G. (2006). Masculine gender roles associated with the increased sexual risk and intimate partner violence perpetration among young adult men. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 575-585.
46.
ShermanL. W.BerkR. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.
47.
ShrockD. P.PadavicI. (2007). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity in a batterer intervention program. Gender & Society, 21, 625-649.
48.
SmithM. E. (2007). Self-deception among men who are mandated to attend a batterer intervention program. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 43, 193-203.
49.
SokoloffN. J.DupontI. (2005). Domestic violence: Examining the intersections of race, class, and gender: An introduction. In SokoloffN. J.PrattC. (Eds.), Domestic violence at the margins: Readings on race, class, gender, and culture (pp. 1-13). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
50.
StrebelA.CrawfordM.SheferT.CloeteA.HendaN.KaufmanM.. (2006). Social constructions of gender roles, gender-based violence and HIV/AIDS in two communities of the Western Cape, South Africa. Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS, 3, 516-527.
51.
WilligC. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
52.
WoodJ. T. (2004). Monsters and victims: Male felons’ accounts of intimate partner violence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 555-576.
