This article presents a reanalysis of data from Gondolf’s (2012) article in this journal on reoffending by men in the 15-month period subsequent to participation in batterer intervention programs. Gondolf concludes that violence by the female partners “was relatively low and does not appear to influence the program outcome in terms of men’s reassault” (p. 10). The reanalyzed data lead to the opposite conclusion. The policy and practice implications are that the high rate of assault by women, including initiation of violence by female partners, needs to be addressed to enhance the effectiveness of programs to prevent and stop violence against women.
ArcherJ. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680.
2.
DouglasE. M.HinesD. A. (2011). The experiences of men who sustain intimate partner violence and seek help: An overlooked population and implications for practice. Journal of Family Violence, 26, 473-485.
3.
FeldS. L.StrausM. A. (1989). Escalation and desistance of wife assault in marriage. Criminology, 27, 141-161.
4.
GellesR.StrausM. A. (1988). Intimate violence: The causes and consequences of abuse in the American family. New York: Simon & Schuster.
5.
GondolfE. W. (1996). Characteristics of batterers in a multi-site evaluation of batterer intervention systems. Minneapolis: MINCAVA Electronic Clearinghouse, Minnesota Center Against Violence and Abuse. Retrieved from www.mincava.umn.edu/documents/gondolf/batchar.html
6.
GondolfE. W. (1998). The victims of court-ordered batterers: Their victimization, help seeking, and perceptions. Violence Against Women, 4, 659-676.
7.
GondolfE. W. (2002). Batterer intervention systems: Issues, outcomes, and recommendations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
GondolfE. W. (2012). Physical tactics of female partners against male batterer program participants. Violence Against Women, 18, 1027-1044.
9.
HirschiT.SelvinH. C. (1967). Principles of survey analysis. New York: Free Press.
10.
KuijpersK.van der KnaapL.WinkelF. (2012). Risk of revictimization of intimate partner violence: The role of attachment, anger, and violent behavior of the victim. Journal of Family Violence, 27, 33-44.
11.
Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.MisraT. A.SelwynC.RohlingM. L. (2012). Rates of bi-directional versus unidirectional intimate partner violence across samples, sexual orientations, and race/ethnicities: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 1-2.
12.
Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.SelwynC.RohlingM. L. (2012). Rates of bidirectional versus unidirectional intimate partner violence across samples, sexual orientations, and race/ethnicities: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 199-230.
13.
LorberM. F.O’LearyK. D. (2011). Stability, change, and informant variance in newlyweds’ physical aggression: Individual and dyadic processes. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 1-15.
O’KeefeM. (1997). Predictors of dating violence among high school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 546-568.
16.
StithS. M.SmithD. B.PennC. E.WardD. B.TrittD. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 65-98.
17.
StrausM. A. (2012a, November). Relation of father-only, mother-only, and mutual violence between parents to crime by university students in 15 nations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago, IL.
18.
StrausMurray A. (2012b). Blaming the messenger for the bad news about partner violence by women: the Methodological, theoretical, and value basis of the purported invalidity of the Conflict Tacticsf Scales. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30(5), 538-556. doi:10.1002/bsl.2023
19.
StrausM. A. (October2013). Dyadic victimization types: A simple but powerful tool and its application to victimization in family relationships worldwide. Paper presented at the IV Spanish Conference on Victimology, Barcelona, Spain.
20.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
21.
StrausM. A.Michel-SmithY. (2014). Mutuality, severity, and chronicity of violence by father-only, mother-only, and mutually violent parents as reported by university students in 15 nations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38, 664-676.
22.
StuartR. B. (2005). Treatment for partner abuse: Time for a paradigm shift. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 254-263.
23.
WhitakerD. J.HaileyesusT.SwahnM.SaltzmanL. S. (2007). Differences in frequency of violence and reported injury between relationships with reciprocal and nonreciprocal intimate partner violence. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 941-947.
