The article looks at the translation of international norms on domestic violence to the national level in five Central and Eastern European countries. It argues that translation brings a concept of domestic violence, which stretches gender equality ideas underpinning international norms so as to be easier to endorse by mainstream policy actors, and results in policies framed in degendered individual rights terms. The potential for keeping gender equality in focus is then guaranteed by gendering policy processes through empowerment of gender equality actors at all stages. Absence of ownership of the policy by gender equality actors risks co-optation by frames contesting gender equality.
The Advocates for Human Rights, Autonomous Women’s House Zagreb, Bulgarian Gender Research Foundation (2012). Implementation of Croatia’s Domestic Violence Legislation. A Human Rights Report. Minneapolis: The Advocates for Human Rights.
2.
BacchiC. (1999). Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems. London, England: Sage.
3.
BaloghL.MatolcsiA. (2009). Vélemények a családon, illetve párkapcsolaton belüli erőszak elleni állami fellépés lehetőségeiről [Opinions on state interventions addressing domestic violence]. Rendeszeti Szemle, 57(12), 81-104.
4.
BumillerK. (2008). In an abusive state: How neoliberalism appropriated the feminist movement against sexual violence. Chapel Hill, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
DobashR. E.DobashR. (1992). Women, violence and social change. London, England: Routledge.
6.
European Commission. (2010). Feasibility study to assess the possibilities, opportunities and needs to standardize national legislation on violence against women, violence against children and sexual orientation violence. Luxembourg, UK: Publications Office of the European Union.
7.
FerreeM. M.GamsonW. A. (2003). The gendering of governance and the governance of gender. In HobsonB. (Ed.), Recognition struggles and social movements. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 35-63.
8.
FerreeM. M.GamsonW. A.GerhardsJ.RuchtD. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
HesterM. (2011). The three planet model: Towards an understanding of contradictions in approaches to women and children’s safety in contexts of domestic violence. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 837-853.
10.
Hungarian Women’s Lobby. (2007, May25). Shadow report on the realization of the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women in Hungary. Incorporated with the Critical Examination of the Sixth Periodic Report of the Hungarian Government Presented at the 39th Session of the CEDAW Committee of the UN. Retrieved from http://www.iwraw-ap.org/resources/pdf/Hungary%20SR%20final.pdf
11.
JalusicV.DedicJ. (2007, September). Framing gender-based violence after the break-up of Yugoslavia: Croatian and Slovenian case. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Pisa, Italy.
12.
JohnsonJ. E.BrunellL. (2006). The emergence of contrasting domestic violence regimes in post-communist Europe. Policy & Politics, 34, 575-595.
KellyL. (2005). Inside outsiders: Mainstreaming gender violence into human rights discourse and practice. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7, 471-495.
15.
KrizsanA.. (2010). Framing gender equality in the European Union and its current and future member states. Deliverable no. 6: Final LARG report. Vienna, Austria: QUING Project IWM.
16.
KrizsanA.BusteloM.HadjigianniA. (2007). Domestic violence: A public matter. In VerlooM. (Ed.), Multiple meanings of gender equality: A critical frame analysis of gender policies in Europe (pp. 141-186). Budapest, Hungary: CEU Press.
17.
KrizsanA.LombardoE. (2013) The quality of gender equality policies. A discursive approach, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 20, 77-92.
18.
KrizsanA.PopaR. (2007, September). A success for women’s movement? Putting domestic violence on the policy agenda in countries of East Central Europe. Paper presented at ECPR General Conference, Pisa, Italy.
19.
LombardoE.MeierP.VerlooM. (2009). The discursive politics of gender equality: Stretching, bending and policy-making. London, England: Routledge.
20.
MartinP. Y. (2007). Coordinated community services for victims of violence. In O’TooleL.SchiffmanJ. R.Kiter EdwardsM. L. (Eds.), Gender violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (2nd ed.). New York: New York University Press, 451-460.
SafranyR. (2003). Public and political discourse on domestic violence in Hungary: The prospects and limits of feminist strategies (Unpublished master’s thesis). Central European University, Budepest, Hungary.
29.
SchmidtV. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth “new institutionalism.”European Political Science Review, 2, 1-25.
30.
SnowD. A.BenfordR. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197-217.
31.
SpeharA. (2007). How women’s movements matter” Women’s movements’ strategies and influence on gender policy formation in post-communist Croatia and Slovenia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Goteborg University. Retrieved from http://www.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1312/1312989_dissertation.pdf
32.
StetsonD.MazurA. (1995). Comparative state feminism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
StratigakiM. (2005). The cooptation of gender concepts in EU policies: The case of “reconciliation of work and family.”Social Politics, 11, 30-56.
VerlooM. (2005a). Displacement and empowerment: Reflections on the Council of Europe approach to gender mainstreaming and gender equality. Social Politics, 12, 344-366.
36.
VerlooM. (2005b). Mainstreaming gender equality in Europe: A critical frame analysis approach. Greek Review of Social Research, 117, 11-34.
