Despite decades of feminist-inspired law reforms, rape remains highly prevalent. While many continue to fight for broad cultural and institutional changes, some argue that more immediate interventions are required. Self-defense techniques represent a key strategy of resistance to rape, and empirical evidence suggests that women’s active resistance may hold a number of positive benefits. In this essay, we compare the aims and objectives of a novel anti-rape technology, known as the Rape-aXe, with traditional self-defense techniques, focusing upon the potential for both to resist individual acts of sexual aggression and, more broadly, end gendered sexual violence.
AngerB.EllnerT.HeydenS.JacksonT. (1999). Fighting back works: The case for advocating and teaching self-defense against rape. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 70, 31-34.
2.
BownesI.O’GormanE.SayersA. (1991). Rape—A comparison of stranger and acquaintance assaults. Medicine, Science, and the Law, 31, 102-109.
3.
BrecklinL. (2008). Evaluation outcomes of self-defense training for women: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 60-76.
4.
BrecklinL.UllmanS. (2005). Self-defense or assertiveness training and women’s responses to sexual attacks. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 738-762.
5.
CahillA. (2009). In defense of self-defense. Philosophical Papers, 38, 363-380.
6.
CermeleJ. (2010). Telling our stories: The importance of women’s narratives of resistance. Violence Against Women, 16, 1162-1172.
7.
Clay-WarnerJ. (2002). Avoiding rape: The effects of protective actions and situational factors on rape outcome. Violence and Victims, 18, 691-705.
8.
ComackE.PetersT. (2005). How the criminal justice system responds to sexual assault survivors: The slippage between “responsibilization” and “blaming the victim. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 17, 283-309.
9.
Du MontJ.WhiteD. (2007). The uses and impacts of medico-legal evidence in sexual assault cases: A global view. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
10.
EllisonL.MunroV. E. (2009). Turning mirrors into windows? Assessing the impact of (mock) juror education in rape trials. British Journal of Criminology, 49, 363-383.
11.
HallR. (2004). “It can happen to you”: Rape prevention in the age of risk management. Hypatia, 19(3), 1-19.
12.
HarrisJ.GraceS. (1999). A question of evidence: Investigating and prosecuting rape in the 1990s. London, England: Home Office.
13.
HollanderJ. (2009). The roots of resistance to women’s self-defense. Violence Against Women, 15, 574-594.
14.
HumphreyM. (2005). Reconciliation and the therapeutic state. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 26, 203-220.
15.
KeatingS. M. (1995). The limitations of intimate samples in sexual offences. Medicine and Law, 14, 387-395.
16.
KellyL.LovettJ.ReganL. (2005). A gap or a chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases. London, England: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
17.
KleckG.SaylesS. (1990). Rape and resistance. Social Problems, 37, 149-162.
18.
LarcombeW. (2002). The “ideal” victim v successful rape complaints: Not what you might expect. Feminist Legal Studies, 10, 131-148.
19.
LievoreD. (2005, January). Prosecutorial decisions in adult sexual assault cases (No. 291). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, Australian Government.
20.
McCaugheyM. (1997). Real knockouts: The physical feminism of women’s self-defense. New York: New York University Press.
21.
ParnisD.Du MontJ. (1999). Rape laws and rape processing: The contradictory nature of corroboration. Canadian Woman Studies, 19(1 & 2), 74-78.
22.
ParnisD.Du MontJ. (2006). Symbolic power and the institutional response to rape: Uncovering the cultural dynamics of a forensic technology. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 43, 73-93.
23.
PupavacP. (2004). War on the couch: The emotionology of the new international security paradigm. European Journal of Social Theory, 7, 149-170.
24.
ReesG. (2010). “It is not for me to say whether consent was given or not”: Forensic medical examiners’ construction of “neutral reports” in rape cases. Social & Legal Studies, 19, 371-386.
25.
ReesG.WhiteD. (2012). Vindictive but vulnerable: The contradictory representations of women as demonstrated in internet discourse surrounding an anti-rape technology. Women’s Studies International Forum, 35, 426-431.
26.
RenzettiC. (2004). Editor’s introduction. Violence Against Women, 10, 203-204.
27.
RozeeP. (2011). New views of rape prevention and resistance: Enlightening men, empowering women. Feminism & Psychology, 21, 257-261.
28.
RozeeP.KossM. (2001). Rape: A century of resistance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 295-311.
29.
SennC. (2011). An imperfect feminist journey: Reflections on the process to develop an effective sexual assault resistance programme for university women. Feminism & Psychology, 21, 121-137.
30.
TemkinJ.KrahéB. (2008). Sexual assault and the justice gap: A question of attitude. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.
31.
UllmanS. (1997). Review and critique of empirical studies of rape avoidance. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 177-204.
32.
UllmanS. (1998). Does offender violence escalate when rape victims fight back?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 179-192.
33.
UllmanS. (2007). A 10-year update of “Review and critique of empirical studies of rape avoidance.”Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 411-429.
34.
UllmanS.KnightR. (1991). A multivariate model for predicting rape and physical injury outcomes during sexual assaults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 724-731.
35.
UllmanS.KnightR. (1992). Fighting back: Women’s resistance to rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 31-43.
36.
VettenL. (2011). Politics and the fine art of preventing rape. Feminism & Psychology, 21, 268-272.
37.
Zoucha-JensenJ.CoyneA. (1993). The effect of resistance strategies on rape. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 1633-1634.
