In this article, we argue that past efforts to distinguish among types of intimate partner violence in general survey data have committed a critical error—using data on current spouses to develop operationalizations of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence. We use ex-spouse data from the National Violence Against Women Survey (NVAWS) to develop new operationalizations. We then demonstrate that NVAWS current spouse data contain little intimate terrorism; we argue that this is likely to be the case for all general surveys. In addition, the ex-spouse data confirm past findings regarding a variety of differences between intimate terrorism and situational couple violence, including those predicted by feminist theories.
AndersonK. L. (2007). Who gets out? Gender as structure and the dissolution of violent heterosexual relationships. Gender & Society, 21, 173-201.
2.
ArcherJ. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680.
3.
BrushL. D. (1990). Violent acts and injurious outcomes in married couples: Methodological issues in the National Survey of Families and Households. Gender & Society, 4, 56-67.
4.
BuzawaE. S. (2003). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
CampbellJ. C.MillerP.CardwellM. M.BelknapR. A. (1994). Relationship status of battered women over time. Journal of Family Violence, 9, 99-111.
6.
CarneyM.ButtellF.DuttonD. (2007). Women who perpetrate intimate partner violence: A review of the literature with recommendations for treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 108-115.
7.
DeKeseredyW. S. (1988). Woman abuse in dating relationships: The relevance of social support theory. Journal of Family Violence, 3, 1-13.
8.
DeKeseredyW. S.SchwartzM. D. (1998). Male peer support and woman abuse in postsecondary school courtship: Suggestions for new directions in sociological research. In BergenR. K. (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 83-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.
10.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1992). Women, violence and social change. New York: Routledge.
11.
DobashR. P.DobashR. E. (2004). Women’s violence to men in intimate relationships: Working on a puzzle. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 324-349.
12.
DobashR. P.DobashR. E.WilsonM.DalyM. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71-91.
13.
DuttonD. G.HamelJ.AaronsonJ. (2010). The gender paradigm in family court processes: Re-balancing the scales of justice from biased social science. Journal of Child Custody, 7, 1-31.
14.
DuttonD. G.NichollsT. L. (2005). The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1—The conflict of theory and data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 680-714.
15.
DuttonM. A.GoodmanL. A. (2005). Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52, 743-757.
16.
FelsonR. B. (2002). Violence and gender reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17.
FelsonR. B.OutlawM. C. (2007). The control motive and marital violence. Violence and Victims, 22, 387-407.
18.
FergussonD. M.HorwoodL. J.RidderE. M. (2005). Partner violence and mental health outcomes in a New Zealand birth cohort. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1103-1119.
19.
FerreeM. M.LorberJ.HessB. B. (2000). Introduction. In FerreeM. M.LorberJ.HessB. B. (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. xv-xxxvi). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
20.
FriezeI. H.BrowneA. (1989). Violence in marriage. In OhlinL.TonryM. (Eds.), Family violence (pp. 163-218). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Graham-KevanN.ArcherJ. (2003a). Intimate terrorism and common couple violence: A test of Johnson’s predictions in four British samples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 1247-1270.
22.
Graham-KevanN.ArcherJ. (2003b). Physical aggression and control in heterosexual relationships: The effect of sampling. Violence and Victims, 18, 181-196.
23.
Graham-KevanN.ArcherJ. (2005, July). Using Johnson’s domestic violence typology to classify men and women in a non-selected sample. Paper presented at the 9th International Family Violence Research Conference, Portsmouth, NH.
24.
HambergerL. K.GuseC. E. (2002). Men’s and women’s use of intimate partner violence in clinical samples. Violence Against Women, 8, 1301-1331.
25.
Holtzworth-MunroeA.MeehanJ. C.HerronK.RehmanU.StuartG. L. (2000). Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1000-1019.
26.
JohnsonH. (1996). Dangerous domains: Violence against women in Canada. Toronto, Ontario: Nelson Canada.
27.
JohnsonM. P. (1993, November). Violence against women in the American family: Are there two forms?Paper presented at the Annual Pre-conference Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop, National Council on Family Relations, Baltimore, MD.
28.
JohnsonM. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 283-294.
29.
JohnsonM. P. (1999, November). Two types of violence against women in the American family: Identifying patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, Irvine, CA.
30.
JohnsonM. P. (2001). Conflict and control: Symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. In BoothA.CrouterA. C.ClementsM. (Eds.), Couples in conflict (pp. 95-104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
JohnsonM. P. (2006a). Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 1003-1018.
32.
JohnsonM. P. (2006b). Gendered communication and intimate partner violence. In DowB. J.WoodJ. T. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gender and communication (pp. 71-87). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
JohnsonM. P. (2007). Domestic violence: The intersection of gender and control. In O’ TooleL. L.SchiffmanJ. R.EdwardsM. K. (Eds.), Gender violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 257-268). New York: New York University Press.
34.
JohnsonM. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
35.
JohnsonM. P.FerraroK. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 948-963.
36.
JohnsonM. P.LeoneJ. M. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 322-349.
37.
KaukinenC. (2004). The help-seeking strategies of female violent-crime victims: The direct and conditional effects of race and the victim-offender relationship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 967-990.
38.
KimmelM. S. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8, 1332-1363.
39.
KleinR. C. A.MilardoR. M. (2000). The social context of couple conflict: Support and criticism from informal third parties. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 618-637.
40.
KreiderR. M.FieldsJ. M. (2001). Number, timing, and duration of marriages and divorces: Fall 1996, Current Population Reports (Vol. P70-P80.). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of the Census.
LawrenceE.BradburyT. N. (2001). Physical aggression and marital dysfunction: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 135-154.
43.
LeoneJ. M.JohnsonM. P.CohanC. M. (2007). Victim help-seeking: Differences between intimate terrorism and situational couple violence. Family Relations, 56, 427-439.
44.
LeoneJ. M.XuY.LapeM. (2008, November). Barriers to help seeking: Understanding the needs of women in violent relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, Little Rock, AR.
45.
LevingerG. (1966). Sources of marital dissatisfaction among applicants for divorce. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 36, 803-807.
46.
McHughM. C.LivingstonN. A.FordA. (2005). A postmodern approach to women’s use of violence: Developing multiple and complex conceptualizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 323-336.
47.
MorseB. J. (1995). Beyond the Conflict Tactics Scale: Assessing gender differences in partner violence. Violence and Victims, 10, 251-272.
48.
RismanB. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society, 18, 429-450.
49.
RoggeR. D.BradburyT. N. (1999). Till violence does us part: The differing roles of communication and aggression in predicting adverse marital outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 340-351.
50.
SteinmetzS. K. (1977-1978). The battered husband syndrome. Victimology, 2, 499-509.
51.
StetsJ. E.StrausM. A. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptation to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 151-165). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
52.
StrausM. A. (1990a). The Conflict Tactics Scales and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. In StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 49-73). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
53.
StrausM. A. (1990b). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. In StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 29-47). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
54.
StrausM. A. (1999). The controversy over domestic violence by women: A methodological, theoretical, and sociology of science analysis. In ArriagaX. B.OskampS. (Eds.), Violence in intimate relationships (pp. 17-44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
SugarmanD. B.FrankelS. L. (1996). Patriarchal ideology and wife-assault: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 13-40.
56.
SwanS. C.GamboneL. J.CaldwellJ. E.SullivanT. P.SnowD. L. (2008). A review of research on women’s use of violence with male intimate partners. Violence and Victims, 23, 301-314.
57.
SwanS. C.SnowD. L. (2002). A typology of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 286-319.
58.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (1999). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
59.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000a). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
60.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000b). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142-161.
61.
TolmanR. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159-177.
62.
YllöK.BogradM. (Eds.). (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
