Many studies have attributed the disproportionately high rate of domestic violence in Asian communities to Asian patriarchal “cultural norms” and the psychological and behavioral traits that these norms produce in individuals. This article seeks to expand the scope of domestic violence analysis beyond these individual and cultural frameworks, arguing that Asian domestic violence is also a product of larger scale, social systems of inequality. By examining the funding criteria of the Family Violence Prevention Services Administration (FVPSA) and the Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) standard used by Robin Hood, my research shows how state and private organizations systematically devalue and underfund minority-targeted programs.
Administrative Directive. (2006). Providing access to temporary assistance programs for persons with disabilities and/or limited English proficiency (06-ADM-05). Albany: New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance.
AhnB. (2002). The perceptions of and attitudes toward partner abuse among first generation Korean-Americans: Their relationships to the incidence of partner abuse (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge. Retrieved from http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-0401102-130106/unrestricted/Ahn_dis.pdf
BauerH. M.RodriguezM. A.QuirogaS. S.Flores-OrtizY. E. (2000). Barriers to health care for abused Latina and Asian immigrant women. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 11, 33-44.
6.
ChangG. (2000). Disposable domestics. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
7.
Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VI, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d.
8.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1299.
9.
Equal Access to Human Services Act of 2003. Local Law No. 73, Section I.
10.
Executive Order No. 120. (2008). Citywide policy on language access to ensure the effective delivery of city services. New York: The City of New York Office of the Mayor.
11.
FarmerP. (2003). Pathologies of power: Health, human rights, and the new war on the poor. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
GordonL.FraserN. (1994). A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state. Signs, 19, 309-336.
KallivayalilD. (2007). Feminist therapy: Its use and implications for South Asian immigrant survivors of domestic violence. Women & Therapy, 30, 109-127.
15.
LeeE. (2007). Domestic violence and risk factors among Korean immigrant women in the United States. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 141-149.
16.
Legal Services for New York City (2007). Translation Woes: Language Barriers at New York City’s Human Resources Administration. New York: Taylor and Abichandani.
17.
LyonE.SullivanC. M. (2007). Outcome evaluation strategies for domestic violence service programs receiving FVPSA funding: A practical guide. Harrisburg, PA: Family Violence Prevention Services Administration.
18.
MasakiB.WongL. (1997). Domestic violence in the Asian community. In LeeE. (Ed.), Working with Asian Americans: A guide for clinicians (pp. 439-451). New York: Guilford.
19.
MenjivarC.SalcidoO. (2002). Immigrant women and domestic violence: Common experiences in different countries. Gender & Society, 16, 898-920.
20.
MorashM.BuiH.StevensT.ZhangY. (2008). Getting out of harm’s way: One-year outcomes for abused women in a Vietnamese immigrant enclave. Violence Against Women, 14, 1413-1429.
21.
National Network to End Domestic Violence. (2005). The Violence Against Women Act of 2005: Summary of provisions. Washington, DC: Author.
22.
RawlesJ. (1989). Castigating QALYs. Journal of Medical Ethics, 15, 143-147.
23.
Robin Hood. (2009). Measuring success: How Robin Hood estimates the impact of grants. New York: Author.
24.
SalazarL.CookS. (2002). Violence against women: Is psychology part of the problem or the solution? A content analysis of psychological research from 1990 through 1999. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 12, 410-421.
25.
SassiF. (2006). Calculating QALYs, comparing QALY and DALY calculations. Health Policy and Planning, 21, 402-408.
26.
SokoloffN. J.DupontI. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersection of race, class, and gender: Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11, 38-64.
27.
Violence Against Women Act, Title IV of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of1994, Pub. L. No. 103–322 (1994).
World Health Organization. (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: Initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
WongR. R. (1995). Divorce mediation among Asian Americans: Bargaining in the shadow of diversity. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 33, 110-128.
32.
YickA. (2001). Feminist theory and status inconsistency theory: Application to domestic violence in Chinese immigrant families. Violence Against Women, 7, 545-562.
33.
YickA. G.Oomen-EarlyJ. (2008). A 16-year examination of domestic violence among Asians and Asian Americans in the empirical knowledge base: A content analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1075-1094.
34.
YoshihamaM.DabbyC. (2009). Facts & stats: Domestic violence in Asian, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander homes. Washington, DC: Asian & Pacific Islander Institute on Domestic Violence.
