The purpose of this study was to examine the ways in which abuse that occurred during marriage/relationship continued within divorce and custody-related legal proceedings. Twenty-seven women participated in semistructured interviews. Interviews were analyzed utilizing a grounded theory approach in order to inductively arrive at a theory explaining how abuse dynamics may continue during legal proceedings. Participants identified child support litigation, custody and visitation battles, intimidation/harassment, deliberately prolonging the case, manipulating finances, and distortions of information as methods by which their exes sought to maintain power and control. Counseling implications are described.
American Psychological Association. (1998). Report of the American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force report on violence and the family: Issues and dilemmas in family violence. Retrieved from http://www.nnflp.org/apa/issue5.html
2.
American Psychological Association. (2005). Violence and the family: Report of the American Psychological Association—Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.nnflp.org/apa/viol&fam.html.
3.
AncisJ. R.WatsonL. B. (2009, August). Litigants’ experiences of guardians Ad Litem: Clinical and advocacy implications. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
4.
AncisJ. R.WatsonL. B.JacksonT. (2009, April). The role of power, control, and dual relationships in divorce and custody disputes. Paper presented at the Southeastern Regional Counseling Psychology Conference, Athens, GA.
FloodM. (2010). Fathers’ rights and the defense of paternal authority in Australia. Violence Against Women, 16, 328-347.
14.
GayL. R.AirasianP. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
15.
Gender Bias Study of the Court System in Massachusetts (Gender Bias Study). (1990). New England Law Review, 24, 745-752.
16.
GillisJ. R.DiamondS. L.JebelyP.OrekhovskyVOstovichE. M.MacIsaacK., et al. (2006). Systemic obstacles to battered women’s participation in the judicial system: When will the status quo change?Violence Against Women, 12, 1150-1168.
17.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
18.
GondolfE. W. (2000). A 30-month follow-up of court-referred batterers in four cities. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 111-128.
19.
GoodmanL. A.EpsteinD. (2011). The justice system response to domestic violence. In KossM. P.WhiteJ. W.KazdinA. E. (Eds.), Violence against women and children. Vol. 2: Navigating solutions (pp. 215-235). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20.
HaselschwerdtM. L.HardestyJ. L.HandsJ. D. (2001). Custody evaluators’ beliefs about domestic violence allegations during divorce: Feminist and family violence perspectives. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1694-1719.
21.
HarrisonC. (2008). Implacably hostile or appropriately protective? Women managing child contact in the context of domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 14, 381-405.
JaffeP. G.JohnstonJ. R.CrooksC. V.BalaN. (2008). Custody disputes involving allegations of domestic violence: Toward a differentiated approach to parenting plans. Family Court Review, 46, 500-522.
25.
JohnsonN. E.SaccuzzoD. P.KoenW. J. (2005). Child custody mediation in cases of domestic violence: Empirical evidence of a failure to protect. Violence Against Women, 11, 1022-1053.
26.
JohnstonJ. R.CampbellL. E. G. (1993). A clinical typology of interparental violence in disputed custody divorces. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63, 190-199.
27.
KahnF. I.WelchT. L.ZillmerE. A. (1993). MMPI-2 profiles of battered women in transition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 100-111.
28.
Kaser-BoydN. (2004). Battered woman’s syndrome: Clinical features, evaluation, and expert testimony. In ClingB. J. (Ed.), Sexualized violence against women and children: A psychology and law perspective (pp. 41-70). New York: Guilford.
29.
Kaser-BoydN. (2008). Supervision of the psychotherapy of abuse survivors. In HessK.HessK. D.HessT. H. (Eds.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 500-517). New York: John Wiley.
30.
Kaser-BoydN. (2009). Child abuse and domestic violence in divorce and child custody: Ethical issues. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 548-549.
31.
KernicM. A.Monary-ErnsdorffD. J.KoepsellJ. K.HoltV. L. (2005). Children in the crossfire: Child custody determinations among couples with a history of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 11, 991-1021.
32.
MeierJ. S. (2009). A historical perspective on parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation. Journal of Child Custody, 6, 232-257.
33.
MolinaO. (2000). Divorce and domestic violence among African American women. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 34, 131-141.
34.
NeilsonL. C. (2004). Assessing mutual partner-abuse claims in child custody and access claims. Family Court Review, 42, 411-438.
35.
PadgettD. K. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
PagelowM. D. (1981a). Woman battering: Victims and their experiences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
PagelowM. D. (1981b). Secondary battering and alternative of female victims to spouse abuse. In BowkerL. H. (Ed.), Women and crime in America (pp. 277-300). New York: Macmillan.
38.
PagelowM. D. (1993). Justice for victims of spouse abuse in divorce and child custody cases. Violence and Victims, 8(1), 69-83.
39.
RempelM.LabriolaM.DavisR. C. (2008). Does judicial monitoring deter domestic violence recidivism? Results of a quasi-experimental comparison in the Bronx. Violence Against Women, 14, 185-207.
40.
RennerL. M. (2009). Intimate partner violence victimization and parenting stress: Assessing the mediating role of depressive symptoms. Violence Against Women, 15, 1380-1401.
RhodesN. R. (1992). Comparison of MMPI psychopathic deviate scored of battered and nonbattered women. Journal of Family Violence, 7, 297-307.
43.
RiggsD. S.CaulfieldM. B.StreetA. B. (2000). Risk for domestic violence: Factors associated with perpetration and victimization. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 1289-1316.
44.
RobinsonA. L.TregidgaJ. (2007). The perceptions of high-risk victims of domestic violence to a coordinated community response in Cardiff, Wales. Violence Against Women, 13, 1130-1148.
45.
RosenL. N.DragiewiczM.GibbsJ. C. (2009). Fathers’ rights groups: Demographic correlates and impact on custody policy. Violence Against Women, 15, 513-531.
46.
RosewaterL. B.WalkerL. E. A. (Eds.). (1985). Handbook of feminist therapy: Women’s issues in psychotherapy. New York: Springer.
47.
ShipwayL. (2004). Domestic violence: A handbook for health professionals. New York: Taylor & Francis.
48.
StahlyG. B. (1999). Women with children in violent relationships: The choice of leaving may bring the consequence of custody change. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 2, 239-251.
49.
StarkE. (2009). Rethinking custody evaluation in cases involving domestic violence. Journal of Child Custody, 6, 287-321.
50.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51.
SuhanekJ.StahlyG. B. (1991, April). The relationship between domestic violence and child custody: A survey of battered women’s fears and experiences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
52.
TaylorD. H.StoilkovM. V.GrecoD. J. (2008). Ex parte domestic violence orders of protection: How easing access to judicial process has eased the possibility for abuse of the process. Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 18, 83. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.gsu.edu:4364/gtx/advancedSearch.do
WhiteJ. W.KossM. P.KazdinA. E. (Eds.) (2010). Violence against women and children. Vol. 1: Mapping the terrain. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
56.
WinnerK. (1996). Divorced from justice: The abuse of women and children by divorce lawyers and judges. New York: HarperCollins.
