This article seeks to understand differences in the evolution of policies to combat domestic violence against women in the Netherlands and Spain. Although policy change is often viewed as incremental change toward more progressive policies, the two countries studied here reflect opposing dynamics. The Netherlands moved from being a pioneering country to one that gradually marginalized the policy issue, whereas Spain, in contrast, recently developed innovative and far-reaching policies after a long period of low to moderate state responses. The case study points to the central role of frame negotiation, left-wing governments, and strong feminist mobilization.
AckerH.RawieM. (1982). Seksueel geweld tegen vrouwen en meisjes [Sexual violence against women and girls]. Den Haag: Ministeri van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid.
2.
Blijf van mijn Lijf. (1984). Thuis geslagen mevrouw? Blijf van mijn lijf Amsterdam over politie, justitie en overheid [Beaten at home, Mrs? Blijf van mijn lijf Amsterdam about police, justice, and the state]. Amsterdam: Author.
3.
Boletín Oficial del Estado. (2004). Número 313, 29December2004
4.
CharlesN. (2004). Feminist politics and devolution: A preliminary analysis. Social Politics, 11, 297-311.
5.
Comisión AntiAgresiones. (1989). Ante la violación: Responde. Reforma del Código Penal ¡Ya! [Against rape: Respond. Reform of the penal code, now!]. (leaflet).
6.
Comisión de Derechos Humanos Del Senado. (1989). Ponencia de Investigación de Malos Tratos a las Mujeres [Research Report on Ill-Treatment of Women], en BOGG. Senado III Legislatura. Serie I. Boletín General, 12 de mayo de 1989, 313.
7.
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. (2007). Concluding comments of the committee on the elimination of discrimination against women (CEDAW) (37th session.), 15January-2February2007 (CEDAW/C/NLD/CO/4). Netherlands: Author.
8.
Council of Europe. (1998). Plan of action to combat violence against women. EG-S-VL (98) 1.
9.
Diario de Sesiones del Senado. (1989, May24). Diario de Sesiones del Senado. Número 122.
10.
Dutch Department of Justice. (2002). Privé geweld—Publieke zaak. Een nota over de gezamenlijke aanpak van huiselijk geweld [Private violence—Public affair. A policy note about a joint plan to combat domestic violence]. Den Haag: SDU.
11.
Dutch Department of Justice. (2004). Aanpak huiselijk geweld. Rapportage Integratiebeleid Etnische Minderheden 2003 [Combating domestic violence. Report ethnic minorities integration policy]. HTK 28 345 and 29 203, nr. 40.
12.
Dutch Department of Social Affairs. (1984). Bestrijding van seksueel geweld tegen vrouwen en meisjes [Combating sexual violence against women and girls]. HTK 18542, nr. 2.
13.
Dutch Department of Welfare, Public Health, and Culture. (1990). Voortgangsrapportage beleid ter bestrijding van seksueel geweld tegen vrouwen en meisjes [Progress report of the policy to combat sexual violence against women and girls]. HTK 19209, nr. 2.
14.
ElmanA. R. (1996). Sexual subordination and state intervention: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Oxford, UK: Berghahn.
15.
ErtürkY. (2007, February7). Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes, and consequences. Mission to Netherlands. UN General Assembly/Human Rights Council, A/HRC/4/34/Add.4.
16.
FerreeM. M.GamsonW. A.GerhardsJ.RuchtD. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Gutiérrez LópezP. (1990). Violencia doméstica. Respuesta legal e institucional [Domestic violence: Legal and institutional response]. In MaquieiraV.SánchezC. (Eds.), Violencia y sociedad patriarcal [Violence and patriarchal society] (pp. 127-141). Madrid, Spain: Pablo Iglesias.
18.
Handelingen Tweede Kamer. (1983). Privatisering [Privatisation], 17938, No. 1.
19.
Handelingen Tweede Kamer. (1988). Brief van de Minister van Welzijn, Volksgezondheid en Cultuur over de bestrijding van sexueel geweld tegen vrouwen en meisjes [Letter of the minister of welfare, health care and culture on combating sexual violence against women and girls], 18542, nr. 17.
20.
Handelingen Tweede Kamer. (1999). Emancipatiebeleid 1999 [Emancipation policy 1999], 26206, nr. 11.
21.
Handelingen Tweede Kamer. (2008). Plan van aanpak Huiselijk Geweld : De volgende fase [Plan of action domestic violence: The next stage], 28 345, nr. 70.
22.
Instituto de la Mujer. (1992). Memoria 1992 [Annual Report 1992]. Madrid, Spain: Author.
23.
Instituto de la Mujer. (1998). I plan de acción contra la violencia doméstica (1998-2000) [First Plan of action against domestic violence 1998-2000]. Madrid, Spain: Author.
24.
Instituto de la Mujer. (2001). II Plan integral contra la violencia doméstica (2001-2004) [Second Comprehensive Plan against domestic violence 2001-2004]. Madrid, Spain: Author.
25.
JohnsonJ. E.BrunellL. (2006). The emergence of contrasting domestic violence regimes in postcommunist Europe. Policy & Politics, 34, 578-598.
26.
KantolaJ. (2006). Feminists theorize the State. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
27.
KriszánA.BusteloA.HadjiyanniA.KamoutsiF. (2007). Domestic violence: A public matter. In VerlooM. (Ed.), Multiple meanings of gender equality: A critical frame analysis of gender policies in Europe (pp. 141-174). New York: Central European University Press.
28.
LarrauriE. (2007). Criminología crítica y violencia de género [Critical criminology and gender violence]. Madrid, Spain: Trotta.
29.
Laurenzo CopelloP. (2005). La violencia de género en a Ley Integral: Valoración político-criminal [Gender violence and the integral law: A political-criminal evaluation]. Revista Electrónica de Ciencia Penal y Criminología, 07-08, 1-23.
30.
LimaJ. da. (1994). Het klappen van de zweep. Twintig jaar Blijf van mijn lijf Amsterdam [Crackings of the whip. Twenty years of Blijf van mijn lijf Amsterdam]. Utrecht, Netherlands: Jan van Arkel.
31.
LünnemannK. (1996). Vrouwenmishandeling, strafrechtelijk afgedaan? Strafrechtelijke regulering van mannelijk geweld tegen vrouwen in de privésfeer [Women’s abuse and criminal law: The regulation of masculine violence against women in the private sphere]. Deventer, Netherlands: Gouda Quint.
32.
Maqueda AbreuM. (2006). La violencia de género: Entre el concepto jurídico y la realidad social [Gender violence: In between a juridical concept and a social reality]. Revista Artículo, 14, 4-11.
33.
Maqueda AbreuM. (2009). 1989-2009: Veinte años de ‘desencuentros’ entre la ley penal y la realidad de la violencia en la pareja [Twenty years of incongruence against the penal code and the the reality of partner violence]. REDUR, 7, 25-35.
34.
MatthewsN. (1994). Confronting rape: The feminist anti-rape movement and the state. London, UK: Routledge.
35.
Medina-ArizaJ. (2002). Violencia contra la mujer en la pareja: Investigación comparada y situación en España [Violence against women in intímate partner relations: Comparative research and the situation in Spain]. Madrid, Spain: Tirant lo Blanch.
36.
Medinda-ArizaJ. (2006). Politics of crime in Spain, 1978-2004. Punishment and Society, 8, 183-201.
37.
Medina-ArizaJ.BarberetR. (2003). Intimate partner violence in Spain: Findings from a national survey. Violence Against Women, 9, 302-322.
38.
Morillas CuevaL. (2002). Valoración de la violencia de género desde la perspectiva del derecho penal [The evaluation of gender violence from the perspective of the penal code]. Revista Electrónica de Ciencia Penal y Criminología, 4(9). Retrieved from http://criminet.ugr.es/recpc/recpc_04-09.html
39.
OsborneR. (2008). De la violencia (de género) a las cifras de la violencia: Una cuestión política [From gender violence to violence statistics: A political question], EMPIRIA. Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, 15, 99-124.
40.
OutshoornJ. (2000). Op zoek naar de vrouwenbeweging in de jaren ’90. Op zoek naar de vrouwenbeweging in de jaren negentig [In search of the women’s movement in the 1990s]. In SunierT.DuyvendakJ. W.SaharsoS.SreylenF. (Eds.), Emancipatie en subcultuur. Sociale bewegingen in Belgie en Nederland [Emancipation and subculture. Social movements in Belgium and the Netherlands] (pp. 30-49). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Instituut voor Publiek en Politiek.
41.
OutshoornJ.OldersmaJ. (2007). Dutch decay: The dismantling of the women’s policy network in the Netherlands. In OutshoornJ.KantolaJ. (Eds.), Changing state feminism (pp. 182-202). Houndmills Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
42.
Pleguezuelos PuixeuE. (2007). Violencia de género: justicia y seguridad en Europa. Retos actuales y propuestas de cambios legislativos. Libro de actas I Congreso Internacional sobre Violencia de Género [Gender violence: Justice and security in Europe. Actual challenges and proposals for legal changes. Acts of the international congress on gender violence], pp. 168-176. Retrieved from: http://isonomia.uji.es/docs/spanish/publicaciones/pdf/MaquetaVol21.pdf
43.
RoggebandC. (2002). Over de grenzen van de politiek. Een vergelijkende studie naar de opkomst en ontwikkeling van de vrouwenbeweging tegen seksueel geweld in Nederland en Spanje [Beyond the frontiers of politics. A comparative study of the emergence and development of the women’s movement against sexual violence in the Netherlands and Spain]. Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
44.
RoggebandC.VerlooM. (1999). Global sisterhood and political change: The unhappy marriage of women’s movements and nation states. In van KersbergenK.LieshoutR. H.LockG. (Eds.), Expansion and fragmentation: Internationalization, political change, and the transformation of the nation state (pp. 177-194). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
45.
SchönD.ReinM. (1994). Frame reflection: Towards the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
46.
SnowD.BenfordR. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In MorrisA. D.MuellerC. M. (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133-155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47.
Staatsblad van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden. (2008). Wet van 9 oktober 2008, houdende regels strekkende tot het opleggen van een tijdelijk huisverbod aan personen van wie een ernstige dreiging van huiselijk geweld uitgaat (Wet tijdelijk huisverbod) [Law of October, 9 2008, in relation to the rules for temporary restraining orders to persons who are in the risk of committing domestic violence], nr. 421.
48.
StratigakiM. (2004). The cooptation of gender concepts in EU policies: The case of reconciliation of work and family. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State, and Society, 11(1), 30-56.
49.
United Nations. (1993). Declaration on the elimination of violence against women (48/104). New York: Author.
50.
United Nations. (1995, September). Report of the Fourth World Conference on Women, (1995) Beijing, 4-15. New York: Author.
51.
ValienteC. (1999, October). But where are the men? Central-state public policies to combat violence against women in post-authoritarian Spain (1975-1999). Paper presented at the Council of Europe Seminar on Men and Violence Against Women, Strasbourg, France.
52.
WeldonS. L. (2002). Protest, policy, and the problem of violence against women. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
53.
YesilkagitK.De VriesJ. (2004). Reform styles of political and administrative elites in majoritarian and consensus democracies: Public management reforms in New Zealand and the Netherlands. Public Administration, 82, 951-974.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
