AckerJ.BarryK.EsseveldJ. (1996). Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. In GottfriedH. (Ed.), Feminism and social change: Bridging theory and practice (pp. 60-87). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
2.
BalsigerP. W. (2004). Supradisciplinary research and practices: History, objectives and rationale. Futures, 36, 407-421.
3.
CarewA. L.WicksonF. (2010). The TD wheel: A heuristic to shape, support and evaluate transdisciplinary research. Futures, 42, 1146-1155.
4.
CaudillW.RobertsB. (1951). Pitfalls in the organization of interdisciplinary researchHuman Organization, 10(4), 12-15.
5.
DespresC.BraisN.AvellanS. (2004). Collaborative planning for retrofitting suburbs: Transdisciplinarity and intersubjectivity in action. Futures, 36, 471-486.
6.
DeVaultM. L. (1999). Liberating method: Feminism and social research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
7.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1992). Women, violence and social change. New York: Routledge.
8.
DollingI.HarkS. (2000). She who speaks shadow speaks truth: Transdisciplinarity in women’s and gender studies. Signs, 25, 1195-1198.
9.
DuboisE.KellyG.KennedyE. L.KorsmeyerC.RobinsonL. (1988). Feminist scholarship: Kindling in the grove of academe. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
10.
HadornG. H.Hoffman-ReimH.Biber-KlemmG.Grossenbacher-MansuyW.JoyeD.PohlC.. (2008). Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
11.
HardingS.NorbergK. (2005). New feminist approaches to social science methodologies: An introduction. Signs, 30, 2009-2015.
12.
Hesse-BiberS.LeavyP. (2007). Feminist research practice: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Horlick-JonesT.SimeJ. (2004). Living on the border: Knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36, 441-456.
14.
KleinJ. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
15.
KleinJ. T. (2004). Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36, 515-526.
16.
KleinJ. T.Grossenbacher-MansuyW.HaberliR.BillA.ScholzR. W.WeltiM. (2001). Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology and society. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser.
17.
LawrenceR. J.DespresC. (2004). Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36, 397-405.
18.
MessingJ. T. (2011). The social control of family violence. Affilia, 26, 154-168.
19.
NicolescuB. (2005). Transdisciplinarity: Past, present and future. Vitoria, Brazil: Centro de Educacao Transdisciplinar.
20.
PohlC. (2005). Transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research. Futures, 37, 1159-1178.
21.
PohlC. (2008). From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environmental Science & Policy, 11, 46-53.
22.
PohlC. (2010). From transdisciplinarity to transdisciplinary research. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 1, 74-83.
23.
PohlC. (2011). What is progress in transdisciplinary research?Futures, 43, 618-626.
24.
PohlC.HadornG. H. (2007). Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Berne, Switzerland: Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences.
25.
RamadierT. (2004). Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: The case of urban studies. Futures, 36, 423-439.
26.
ReinharzS. (1992.) Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
SharlandE. (2011). All together now? Building disciplinary and inter-disciplinary research capacity in social work and social care. British Journal of Social Work, 42(2), 208-226.
28.
SmithD. E. (1990). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
29.
WicksonF.CarewA. L.RussellA. W. (2006). Transdisciplinary research: Characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures, 38, 1046-1059.