This study examined the effects of male attractiveness, sexual attitudes, and victimization history on women’s ratings of sexual risk. Women with more liberal sexual attitudes rated vignettes as less sexually risky than women with more conservative sexual attitudes. There was an interaction between situational risk and attractiveness, suggesting the relationship between attractiveness and sexual risk ratings varies across high and low situational risk. Findings emphasize the importance of using high and low risk situations to evaluate sexual risk perception and of investigating variables that may moderate women’s risk perception.
AgochaV. B.CooperM. L. (1999). Risk perceptions and safer-sex intentions: Does a partner’s physical attractiveness undermine the use of risk-relevant information?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 746-759.
2.
AndersonL. A.WhistonS. C. (2005). Sexual assault education programs: A meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 374-388.
3.
BaileyM.KirkK.ZhuG.DunneM.MartinN. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian Twin Registry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 537-545.
4.
BreitenbecherK. H. (1999). The association between the perception of threat in a dating situation and sexual victimization. Violence and Victims, 14, 135-146.
5.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1984). Criminal victimization in the United States, 1982 (Publication No. NCJ-92820). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
6.
CartarL.HicksM.SlaneS. (1996). Women’s reactions to hypothetical male sexual touch as a function of initiator attractiveness and level of coercion. Sex Roles, 35, 737-750.
7.
DionK.BersheidE.WalsterE. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290.
8.
EysenckH. J. (1976). Sex and personality. Austin: University of Texas Press.
9.
FeingoldA. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304-341.
10.
FishbeinM.HennessyM.YzerM.CurtisB. (2004). Romance and risk: Romantic attraction and health risks in the process of relationship formation. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 9, 273-285.
11.
FisherB. S.CullenF. T. (2000). Measuring the sexual victimization of women: Evolution, current controversies, and future research. In DuffeeD. (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000: Volume 4—Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (pp. 317-390). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
12.
GerrardM.GibbonsF. X.BenthinA. C.HesslingR. M. (1996). A longitudinal study of the reciprocal nature of risk behaviors and cognitions in adolescents: What you do shapes what you think, and vice versa. Health Psychology, 15, 344-354.
13.
GidyczC. A.CobleC.LathamL.LaymanM. (1993). Sexual assault experience in adulthood and prior victimization experiences: A prospective analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 151-168.
14.
GidyczC. A.HansonK.LaymanM. (1995). A prospective analysis of the relationships among sexual assault experiences: An extension of previous findings. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 5-29.
15.
GidyczC.LohC.LoboT.RichC.LynnS.PashdagJ. (2007). Reciprocal relationships among alcohol use, risk perception, and sexual victimization: A prospective analysis. Journal of American College Health, 56, 5-14.
16.
GidyczC. A.McNamaraJ. R.EdwardsK. M. (2006). Women’s risk perception and sexual victimization: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 441-456.
17.
GordonM. T.RigerS. (1989). The female fear. New York: Free Press.
18.
HennessyM.FishbeinM.CurtisB.BarrettD. W. (2007). Evaluating the risk and attractiveness of romantic partners when confronted with contradictory cues. AIDS Behavior, 11, 479-490.
19.
HickmanS. E.MuehlenhardC. L. (1997). College women’s fears and precautionary behaviors relating to acquaintance rape and stranger rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 527-547.
20.
KossM. P.GidyczC. A. (1985). Sexual Experiences Survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 422-423.
21.
KossM. P.GidyczC. A.WisniewskiN. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162-170.
22.
LangloisJ. H.Kalakanisl.RubensteinA. J.LarsonA.HallamM.SmootM. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390-423.
23.
MarxB. P.GrossA. M. (1995). Date rape: An analysis of two contextual variables. Behavior Modification, 19, 451-463.
24.
MeadowsE.JaycoxL. H.OrsilloS. M.FoaE. B. (1997, November). The impact of assault on risk recognition in ambiguous situations. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Miami Beach, FL.
25.
Messman-MooreT. L.BrownA. L. (2006). Risk perception, rape, and sexual revictimization: A prospective study of college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 159-172.
26.
Messman-MooreT. L.LongP. J. (2003). The role of childhood sexual abuse sequelae in the sexual revicitmization of women: An empirical review and theoretical reformulation. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 537-571.
27.
NasonE.YeaterE.A. (2010). The relationship between sexual victimization history and women’s Responses to high and low risk situations. Manuscript in preparation.
28.
NaugleA. E. (2000). Identifying behavioral risk factors for repeated victimization using video-taped stimulus materials. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(2-B), 1091.
29.
NorrisJ.NuriusP.DimeffL. (1996). Through her eyes: Factors affecting women’s perception of and resistance to acquaintance sexual aggression threat. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 123-145
30.
RiceW. R.GainesS. D. (1994). Heads I win, tails you lose: Testing directional alternative hypotheses in ecological and evolutionary research. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 235-237.
31.
SealD. W.AgostinelliG. (1994). Individual differences associated with high-risk sexual behaviour: Implications for intervention programmes. AIDS Care, 6, 393-397.
32.
SimpsonJ. A.GangestadS. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870-883.
33.
Soler-BailloJ. M.MarxB. P.SloanD. M. (2005). The psychophysiological correlates of risk recognition among victims and non-victims of sexual assault. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 169-181.
34.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
35.
VanZile-TamsenC.TestaM.LivingstonJ. A. (2005). The impact of sexual assault history and relationship context on appraisal of and responses to acquaintance sexual assault risk. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 813-832.
36.
WellsG. L.WindschitlP. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115-1125.
37.
WilsonA. E.CalhounK. S.BernatJ. A. (1999). Risk recognition and trauma-related symptoms among sexually revictimized women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 705-710.
38.
YeaterE. A.McFallR. M.VikenR. J. (2011). The relationship between women’s response effectiveness and a history of sexual victimization, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 462-478.
39.
YeaterE. A.VikenR. J.HoytT.DolanJ. (2009). Self-other perspective and sexual attitudes affect estimates of sexual risk. Sex Roles, 61, 110-119.
40.
YeaterE. A.VikenR. J.McFallR. M.WagnerL. R. (2006). Sexual attitudes and instructional set affect estimates of risk and response effectiveness. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 4, 232-242.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
