Violence against women (VAW) in India is commonly attributed to an overarching metacultural patriarchal framework. Focusing on this national culture of violence obscures the experiences of VAW among ethnic minority women. This article focuses on VAW in Northeast India, a region populated by large numbers of Scheduled Tribes with different cultural norms, and where society has become militarized by ongoing insurgency and counterinsurgency. Though tempting, militarization alone is not a sufficient explanation for VAW; instead, this article focuses on the interplay between nonfamilial and familial contexts in creating a “frontier culture of violence” in which VAW is experienced and contested.
Ahmed-GhoshH. (2004). Chattels of society: Domestic violence in India. Violence Against Women, 10, 94-118.
2.
AlvarezS. E. (2009). Beyond NGO-ization: Reflections from Latin America. Development, 52, 175-184.
3.
Asian Centre for Human Rights. (2008a). India human rights report 2008. New Delhi, India: Author.
4.
Asian Centre for Human Rights. (2008b). Torture in India 2008: A state of denial. New Delhi, India: Author.
5.
ArunachalamR.LoganT. (2008). Is there dowry inflation in South Asia?Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
6.
BannerjeeP. (2008a). Communities, gender and the border: A legal narrative on India’s North East. In KannabiranK.SinghR. (Eds.), Challenging the rule(s) of law (pp. 257-280). New Delhi, India: SAGE.
7.
BannerjeeP. (2008b). The space between: Women’s negotiations with democracy. In BannerjeeP. (Ed.), Women in peace politics (pp. 201-217). New Delhi, India: SAGE.
8.
BarboraS.FernandesW. (2002). Modernization and tribal women’s status in Northeast India. In FernandesW.BarboraS. (Eds.), Changing women’s status in India: Focus on the Northeast (pp. 114-138). Guwahati, Assam, India: North Eastern Social Research Centre.
9.
BaruahS. (2005). Durable disorder: Understanding the politics of Northeast India. New York, India: Oxford University Press.
10.
BaruahS. (2006). A new politics of race: India and its North-east. In SenG. (Ed.), Where the sun rises when shadows fall: The North-East (pp. 164-176). New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
11.
BasuA. (1998). Hindu women’s activism in India and the questions it raises. In JefferyP.BasuA. (Eds.), Appropriating gender: Women’s activism and politicized religion in South Asia (pp. 167-184). New York: Routledge.
12.
BasuM. (2001). Hindu women and marriage law: From sacrament to contract. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
BhaumikS. (2004). Ethnicity, ideology and religion: Separatist movements in India’s Northeast. In LimayeS. P. (Ed.), Religious radicalism and security in South Asia (pp. 219-244). Honolulu, HI: Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies.
14.
BlochF.RaoV. (2002). Terror as a bargaining instrument: A case study of dowry violence in rural India. American Economic Review, 92, 1029-1043.
15.
BrahA.PhoenixA. (2004). Ain’t I a woman? Revisiting intersectionality. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 5(3), 75-86.
16.
BraraN. V. (2002). Breaking the myth: Social status of Metei women. In FernandesW.BarboraS. (Eds.), Changing women’s status in India: Focus on the Northeast (pp. 193-201). Guwahati, Assam, India: North Eastern Social Research Centre.
17.
ChasieC.HazarikaS. (2009). The state strikes back: India and the Naga insurgency. Washington, DC: East-West Center.
18.
ChenoyA. M. (2002). Militarism and women in South Asia. New Delhi, India: Kali for Women.
19.
ChhachhiA. (1991). Forced identities: The state, communalism, fundamentalism and women in India. In KandiyotiD. (Ed.), Women, Islam and the state (pp. 144-175). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
20.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1299.
21.
DaiM. (2007). Living the untold myth: Politics of conflict in Arunachal Pradesh. In SaikiaJ. (Ed.), Frontier in flames: North East India in turmoil (pp. 50-64). New Delhi, India: Penguin.
22.
DasH. N. (2007). Brigands of fortune: The economics of North East militancy. In SaikiaJ. (Ed.), Frontier in flames: North East India in turmoil (pp. 155-169). New Delhi, India: Penguin.
23.
DasN. K. (1989). Ethnic identity, ethnicity, and social stratification in North-East India. New Delhi: Inter-India.
24.
DasS. K. (2008a). Introduction. In DasS. K. (Ed.), Blisters on their feet: Tales of internally displaced persons in India’s North East (pp. 11-46). New Delhi, India: SAGE.
25.
DasS. K. (2008b). Ethnicity and democracy meet when mothers protest. In BanerjeeP. (Ed.), Women in peace politics (pp. 54-77). New Delhi, India: SAGE.
26.
DeviK. B. (1998). Women in social movements in Manipur. In KarnaM. N. (Ed.), Social movements in North-East India (pp. 75-81). Shillong, Meghalaya, India: North-East India Council for Social Science Research.
27.
FarrellyN. (2009). “AK47/M16 Rifle—Rs. 15,000 each”: What price peace on the Indo-Burmese frontier?Contemporary South Asia, 17, 283-297.
GaikwadN. (2009). Revolting bodies, hysterical state: Women protesting the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (1958). Contemporary South Asia, 17, 299-311.
30.
GillP. (2006). Women in the time of conflict: The case of Nagaland. In SenG. (Ed.), Where the sun rises when shadows fall: The North-East (pp. 213-226). New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
31.
GoswamiR.SreekalaM.GoswamiM. (2005). Women in armed conflict situations. Guwahati, Assam, India: North East Network.
32.
Government of India. (2002). National human development report 2001. New Delhi, India: Author.
33.
HansenT. B.StepputatF. (2001). States of imagination. In HansenT. B.StepputatF. (Eds.), States of imagination: Ethnographic explorations of the postcolonial state (pp. 1-38). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
34.
Human Rights Watch. (2008). Getting away with murder: 50 years of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act. New York: Author.
35.
HussainW. (2006). Homemakers without the men: Assam’s widows of violence. New Delhi, India: Indialog.
36.
Jordan-ZacheryJ. S. (2007). Am I a black woman or a woman who is black? A few thoughts on the meaning of intersectionality. Politics and Gender, 3, 254-263.
37.
KandiyotiD. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2, 274-290.
38.
KapadiaK. (2002). Translocal modernities and transformations of gender and caste. In KapadiaK. (Ed.), The violence of development: The politics of identity, gender, and social inequalities in India (pp. 142-182). New Delhi, India: Kali for Women.
39.
KaranjawalaT.ChughS. (2009). The legal battle against domestic violence in India: Evolution and analysis. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 23(3), 1-20.
40.
KaurR.GargS. (2008). Addressing domestic violence against women: An unfinished agenda. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 33(2), 73-76.
41.
KaurR.GargS. (2009). Domestic violence against women: A qualitative study in a rural community. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 22, 242-251.
42.
KelkarG. (1985). Women and structural violence in India. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 13(3), 16-18.
43.
KikonD. (2002). Political mobilization of women in Nagaland: A sociological background. In FernandesW.BarboraS. (Eds.), Changing women’s status in India: Focus on the Northeast (pp. 174-182). Guwahati, Assam, India: North Eastern Social Research Centre.
44.
KikonD. (2009a). The predicament of justice: Fifty years of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act in India. Contemporary South Asia, 17, 271-282.
45.
KikonD. (2009b). From loincloth, suits, to battle greens: Politics of clothing the “naked” Nagas. In BaruahS. (Ed.), Beyond counter-insurgency: Breaking the impasse in Northeast India (pp. 81-100). New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
46.
KrishnaS. (1996). Environmental politics: People’s lives and development choices. New Delhi, India: SAGE.
47.
KrishnaS. (2004). Gender, tribe and political participation: Control of natural resources in North-eastern India. In KrishnaS. (Ed.), Livelihood and gender: Equity in community resource management (pp. 375-394). New Delhi, India: SAGE.
48.
KrishnanS. (2005). Do structural inequalities contribute to marital violence? Ethnographic evidence from rural South India. Violence Against Women, 11, 759-775.
49.
LacinaB. (2007). Does counterinsurgency theory apply in Northeast India?India Review, 6, 165-183.
50.
MartinS. L.MoraccoK. E.GarroJ.TsuiA. O.KupperL. L.ChaseJ. L.. (2002). Domestic violence across generations: Findings from northern India. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 560-572.
51.
MayaramS. (2002). New modes of violence: The backlash against women in the Panchayat system. In KapadiaK. (Ed.), The violence of development: The politics of identity, gender, and social inequalities in India (pp. 393-424). New Delhi, India: Kali for Women.
52.
McClintockA. (1995). Imperial leather: Race, gender & sexuality in the colonial contest. New York: Routledge.
53.
McDuie-RaD. (2005). Searching for human security in “disturbed” areas: Women as agents for change in Manipur, India. Australasian Journal of Human Security, 1(2), 49-64.
54.
McDuie-RaD. (2006). Civil society organizations and human security: Transcending constricted space in Meghalaya. Contemporary South Asia, 15, 35-53.
55.
McDuie-RaD. (2007). The constraints on civil society beyond the State: Gender-based Insecurity in Meghalaya, India. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 18, 359-384.
56.
McDuie-RaD. (2009a). Gender, ethnicity, and civil society: Exploring the links between women’s movements and identity politics in Northeast India. In UlrichJ. H.CosellB. T. (Eds.), Handbook on gender roles: Conflicts, behavior and attitudes (pp. 123-146). New York: Nova Science.
57.
McDuie-RaD. (2009b). Fifty-year disturbance: The Armed Forces Special Powers Act and exceptionalism in a South Asian periphery. Contemporary South Asia, 17, 255-270.
58.
MenonN. (2009). Sexuality, caste, governmentality: Contests over gender in India. Feminist Review, 91, 94-112.
59.
MenskiW. (Ed.). (1998). South Asians and the dowry problem. Stoke on Trent, UK: Trentham Books.
60.
MillsJ. H. (2006). “Manipur rules here”: Gender, politics, and sport in an Asian border zone. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 30, 62-76.
61.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2002). National Family and Health Survey 2. New Delhi, India: Author.
62.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2009). National Health and Family Survey 3—National report. New Delhi, India: Author.
63.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, KishorS.GuptaK. (2009). Gender equality and women’s empowerment in India: A report from the National Family Health Survey 3. New Delhi, India: Author.
64.
Ministry of Home Affairs. (1998). The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act 1958. New Delhi, India: Author. (Original work published 1958)
65.
MoserC.ClarkF. (2001). Introduction. In MoserC.ClarkF. (Eds.), Victims, perpetrators, or actors? Gender, armed conflict, and political violence (pp. 12-29). London, UK: Zed Books.
66.
NongbriT. (2003). Development, ethnicity and gender: Select essays on tribes in India. Jaipur, Rajasthan, India: Rawat.
67.
NongbriT. (2008). Gender, matriliny, and entrepreneurship: The Khasis of North-East India. New Delhi, India: Zubaan.
68.
NordstromC. (2004). Shadows of war: Violence, power, and international profiteering in the twenty-first century. Berkeley: University of California Press.
69.
OldenburgV. T. (2002). Dowry murder: The imperial origins of a cultural crime. New York: Oxford University Press.
70.
PanchanadeswaranS.KoverolaC. (2005). The voices of battered women in India. Violence Against Women, 11, 736-758.
71.
PandaP.AgarwalB. (2005). Marital violence, human development and women’s property status in India. World Development, 33, 823-850.
ParrattJ.ParrattS. A. (2003). A new beginning? Manipur’s state elections: 2002. South Asia Research, 23, 99-109.
74.
RastogiM.TherlyP. (2006). Dowry and its link to violence against women in India: Feminist psychological perspectives. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 7, 66-77.
75.
RayR. (1999). Fields of protest: Women’s movements in India. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
76.
SchulerS. R.BatesL. M.IslamF. (2008). Women’s rights, domestic violence, and recourse seeking in rural Bangladesh. Violence Against Women, 14, 326-345.
77.
SharmaB. R. (2005). Social etiology of violence against women in India. Social Science Journal, 42, 375-389.
78.
ShenkM. K. (2007). Dowry and public policy in contemporary India. Human Nature, 18, 242-263.
79.
SinghK. B. (2004). Manipur Vaishnavism: A sociological interpretation. In RobinsonR. (Ed.), Sociology of religion in India (pp. 125-132). New Delhi, India: SAGE.
80.
South Asian Human Rights Documentation Centre. (1995). Armed Forces Special Powers Act: A study in national security tyranny. New Delhi, India: Author.
81.
SrinivasanS.BediA. S. (2007). Domestic violence and dowry: Evidence from a South Indian village. World Development, 35, 857-880.
82.
SrivastavaN. (2002). Multiple dimensions of violence against rural women in Uttar Pradesh: Macro and micro realities. In KapadiaK. (Ed.), The violence of development: The politics of identity, gender, and social inequalities in India (pp. 235-294). New Delhi, India: Kali for Women.
83.
SubramaniamM. (2006). The power of women’s organizing: Gender, caste, and class in India. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
84.
UberoiP. (1994). Family, kinship and marriage in India. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
85.
United Nation Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2001). State of women in urban local government in India. Mumbai, Maharashtra: Author.
86.
VajpeyiA. (2009). Resenting the Indian state: For a new political practice in the Northeast. In BaruahS. (Ed.), Beyond counter-insurgency: Breaking the impasse in Northeast India (pp. 25-48). New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
87.
Van WilligenJ.ChannaV. C. (1991). Law, custom, and crimes against women: The problem of dowry death in India. Human organization, 50, 369-377.
88.
VedaG. (2005). Tailoring peace: The citizens’ roundtable on Manipur and beyond. Guwahati, Assam, India: North East Network.
89.
VyasP. (2006). Reconceptualizing domestic violence in India: Economic abuse and the need for broad statutory interpretation to promote women’s fundamental rights. Michigan Journal of Gender & Law, 13, 177-206.
90.
Yuval-DavisN. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13, 193-209.
91.
ZeholL. (Ed.). (1998). Women in Naga society. New Delhi, India: Regency.
92.
ZoteM. (2006). Heaven in hell: A paradox. In SenG. (Ed.), Where the sun rises when shadows fall: The North-East (pp. 203-212). New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
