Survivor voice is essential to effectively implement survivor-focused IPV (intimate partner violence) services. In this focus group study, domestic violence survivors (n = 30) shared detailed perspectives as service seekers and recipients, whereas national hotline advocates (n = 24) explored relationships between service providers and survivors based on their interactions with both. Four thematic categories related to enhancing IPV services emerged: providing empathy, supporting empowerment, individualizing care, and maintaining ethical boundaries. Advocates identified additional factors that interfered with quality services, including the following: inadequate organizational resources, staff burnout, lack of training, and poor integration with other community resources. Respectful, empowering relationships are the centerpiece for quality IPV services.
BarakM. E. M.NisslyJ. A.LevinA. (2001). Antecedents to retention and turnover among child welfare, social work, and other human service employees: What can we learn from past research? A review and metanalysis. Social Service Review, 75, 625-661
2.
BellH. (2003). Strengths and secondary trauma in family violence work. Social Work, 48, 513-522.
3.
BellH.KulkarniS. (2006). Assessing the service needs of survivors of intimate partner violence. Austin, TX: Institute on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault under contract with the National Domestic Violence Hotline.
4.
BellH.KulkarniS.DaltonL. (2003). Organizational prevention of vicarious trauma. Families in Society, 84, 463-470.
5.
BergB. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
6.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
DanisF. S. (2003). The criminalization of domestic violence: What social workers need to know. Social Work, 48, 237-246.
DienemannJ.CampbellJ.LandenburgerK.CurryM. A. (2002). The domestic violence survivor assessment: A tool for counseling women in intimate partner violence relationships. Patient Education and Counseling, 46, 221-228.
10.
DonnellyD. A.CookK. J.Van AusdaleD.FoleyL. (2005). White privilege, color blindness, and services to battered women. Violence Against Women, 11, 6-37.
11.
ElliottD. E.BjelajacP.FallotR. D.MarkoffL. S.ReedB. G. (2005). Trauma-informed or trauma-denied: Principles and implementation of trauma-informed services for women. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 461-477.
12.
GoodmanL. A.EpsteinD. (2009). Listening to battered women: A survivor-centered approach toadvocacy, mental health, and justice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
13.
HermanJ. H. (1997). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—from domestic abuse to political terror. New York: Basic Books.
14.
KulkarniS. J.BellH.WylieL. (in press). Challenges in meeting the needs of IPV survivors. Journal of Family and Community Health.
15.
LaneyG. P. (2005). Violence against Women Act: History and federal funding. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
16.
LeinL.JacquetS. E.LewisC. M.ColeP. R.WilliamsB. B. (2001). With the best of intentions: Family violence option and abused women’s needs. Violence Against Women, 7, 193-210.
17.
McDermottM. J.GarofaloJ. (2004). When advocacy for domestic violence victims backfires: Types and sources of victim disempowerment. Violence Against Women, 10, 1245-1266.
18.
MillerJ. B.StiverI. P. (1997). The healing connection: How women form relationships in therapy and in life. Boston, MA: Beacon.
19.
PadgettD. K. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
PearlmanL. A.SaakvitneK. W. (1995). Trauma and the therapist: Countertransference and vicarious traumatization in psychotherapy with incest survivors. New York: Norton.
21.
SchechterS. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women’s movement. Boston, MA: South End.
22.
ShephardM. F.PenceE. L. (1999). Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
SlatteryS. M.GoodmanL. A. (2009). Secondary traumatic stress among domestic violence advocates: Workplace risk and protective factors. Violence Against Women, 15, 1358-1379.
24.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
25.
TolmanR. M.RaphaelJ. (2000). A review of research on welfare and domestic violence. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 655-681.
