This study is a multiple logistic regression analysis of the relationship between dimensions of women’s status and domestic abuse in rural Uttar Pradesh, India, using the 1998-1999 National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2). Findings indicate that the effects of a woman’s status on her likelihood of experiencing abuse depend on the social realm within which status operates. Specifically, more “public” dimensions of status are associated with a greater probability of abuse, while “domestic” dimensions are protective. The findings are interpreted in terms of transitioning gender norms in Uttar Pradesh and provide clarity to the literature on the complex relationship between status and abuse.
Basu, A.M., & Koolwal, G.B. ( 2005). Two concepts of empowerment: Some leads from DHS data on women’s status and reproductive health. In S. Kishor (Ed.), A focus on gender: Collected papers on gender using DHS data (pp. 15-53). Calverton, MD: ORC Macro, Measure DHS.
2.
Bates, L., Schuler, S., Islam, F., & Islam, M. ( 2004). Socioeconomic factors and processes associated with domestic violence in rural Bangladesh. International Family Planning Perspectives, 30, 190-199.
3.
Bhandari, N. ( 2008). Documentation of a campaign to end violence against women and girls and to promote gender equality in India: MASVAW. Stockholm, Sweden: Save the Children, Sweden.
4.
Blake, J. ( 1965). Demographic science and the redirection of population policy. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 18(November), 1181-1200.
5.
Cain, M. ( 1984). Women’s status and fertility in developing countries: Son preference and economic security (World Bank Staff Working Papers, Number 682). Washington, DC: World Bank.
6.
Caldwell, J.C. ( 1979). Education as a factor in mortality decline: An examination of Nigerian data. Population Studies, 33(November), 395-413.
7.
Caldwell, J.C. ( 1982). Theory of Fertility Decline. London : Academic Press.
8.
Caldwell, J., Reddy, P.H., & Caldwell, P. ( 1982). The causes of demographic change in rural South India: A micro approach. Population and Development Review, 8, 689-727.
9.
Dixon, R.B. ( 1975). Women’s rights and fertility. Reports on Population/Family Planning, No. 17 (January).
10.
Dyson, T., & Moore, M. ( 1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9, 35-60.
11.
Germain, A. ( 1975). Status and roles of women as factors in fertility behavior: A policy analysis. Studies in Family Planning6(July), 192-200.
12.
Heise, L. ( 1989). International dimensions of violence against women. Response to the Victimization of Women and Children, 12(1), 3-11.
13.
Heise, L., Raikes, A., Watts, C., & Zwi, A. ( 1994). Violence against women: A neglected public health issue in less developed countries. Social Science & Medicine , 39, 1165-1179.
14.
Hindin, M.J., & Adair. L.S. ( 2002). Who’s at risk? Factors associated with intimate partner violence in the Philippines. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 1385-1399.
15.
Hoffman, K.L., Demo, D.H., & Edwards, J.N. ( 1994). Physical wife abuse in a non-western society: An integrated theoretical approach. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 131-146.
16.
Jejeebhoy, S.J. ( 1998). Wife-beating in rural India: A husband’s right? Evidence from survey data. Economic and Political Weekly, 33, 855-862.
17.
Jejeebhoy, S.J. ( 2000). Women’s autonomy in rural India: Its dimensions, determinants, and the influences of context. In H. B. Presser & G. Sen (Eds.), Women’s empowerment and demographic processes: Moving beyond Cairo (pp. 205-238). New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Jejeebhoy, S.J. ( 2002). Convergence and divergence in spouses’ perspectives on women’s autonomy in rural India. Studies in Family Planning, 33, 299-308.
19.
Jejeebhoy, S.J., & Cook, R.J. ( 1997). State accountability for wife-beating: The Indian challenge . Lancet, 349, S110-S112.
20.
Jejeebhoy, S.J., & Sathar, Z.A. ( 2001). Women’s autonomy in India and Pakistan: The influence of religion and region. Population and Development Review , 27, 687-712.
21.
Jewkes, R., Levin, J., & Penn-Kekana, L. (2002). Risk factors for domestic violence: Findings from a South African cross-sectional study. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 1603-1617.
22.
Johnson, K. ( 2001). Media and social change: The modernizing influences of television in rural India. Media, Culture, and Society, 23, 147-169.
23.
Kishor, S. ( 2000). Empowerment of women in Egypt and links to the survival and health of their infants. In H. B. Presser & G. Sen (Eds.), Women’s empowerment and demographic processes: Moving beyond Cairo (pp. 119-156). New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Kishor, S., & Johnson, K. ( 2004). Profiling domestic violence: A multi-country study. Calverton, MD: ORC Macro, Measure DHS.
25.
Koenig, M.A., Ahmed, S., Hossain, M.B., & Mozumder, K.A. (2003a). Women’s status and domestic violence in rural Bangladesh: Individual-and community-level effects . Demography, 40, 269-288.
26.
Koenig, M.A., Lutalo, T., Zhao, F., Nalugoda, F., Wabwire-Mangen, F., Kiwanuka, N., et al. (2003b). Domestic violence in Rakai, Uganda: Evidence from a community-based survey. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81, 53-60.
27.
Koenig, M.A., Stephenson, R., Ahmed, S., Jejebhoy, S.J., & Campbell, J.C. (2006). Individual and contextual determinants of domestic violence in north India. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 132-138.
28.
Malhotra, A., Schuler, S.R., & Boender, C. ( 2002). Measuring women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. Gender and Development Group of the World Bank . Washington, DC: World Bank.
29.
Mason, K.O. ( 1986). The status of women: Conceptual and methodological issues in demographic studies. Sociological Forum, 1, 284-300.
30.
Nelson, E., & Zimmerman, C. ( 1996). Household survey on domestic violence in Cambodia. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Ministry of Women’s Affairs, Project Against Domestic Violence.
31.
Presser, H.B., & Sen, G. ( 2000). Women’s empowerment and demographic processes: Laying the groundwork. In H. B. Presser & G. Sen (Eds.), Women’s empowerment and demographic processes: Moving beyond Cairo (pp. 4-11). New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Purkayastha, B., Subramaniam, M., Desai, M., & Bose, S. ( 2003). The study of gender in India: A partial review. Gender & Society, 17, 503-524.
33.
Rao, V. ( 1997). Wife-beating in rural south India: A qualitative and econometric analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 44, 1169-1180.
34.
Rao, V., & Bloch, F. ( 2002). Terror as a bargaining instrument: A case study of dowry violence in rural India. American Economic Review, 92, 1028-1043.
35.
Rudd, J. ( 2001). Dowry-murder: An example of violence against women. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24, 513-522.
36.
Schuler, S.R., & Farzana, I. ( 2008). Women’s acceptance of intimate partner violence within marriage in rural Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning , 39, 49-58.
37.
Watts, C., & Zimmerman, C. ( 2002). Violence against women: Global scope and magnitude. Lancet, 359, 1232-1237.
38.
Yick, A.G. ( 2001). Feminist theory and status inconsistency theory: Application to domestic violence in Chinese immigrant families. Violence Against Women, 7, 545-562.
