Although most battered women seeking formal help have some contact with court, limited research exists on what they find helpful and harmful about these experiences. Using qualitative data from low-income, largely Black battered women, this study finds that issues related to court outcomes, such as case disposition and enforcement, are important to evaluations of helpfulness. More frequently mentioned, however, are court processes, including treatment by staff, process length, and public disclosure. Results highlight the importance of research and practice attending to issues beyond court outcomes, as well as the potential impact supportive treatment at court may have for victims’ recovery.
Barata, P.C. ( 2007). Abused women’s perspectives on the criminal justice system’s response to domestic violence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 202-215.
2.
Bell, M.E. ( 2007). Empowerment and disempowerment for victims of intimate partner violence: An overview of the effects of criminal justice system practices . In K. Kendall-Tackett & S. M. Giacomoni (Eds.), Intimate partner violence (pp. 1-23). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
3.
Bell, M.E., & Goodman, L.A. ( 2001). Supporting battered women involved with the court system: An evaluation of a law school-based advocacy intervention. Violence Against Women, 7, 1377-1404.
4.
Bell, M.E., Goodman, L.A., & Dutton, M.A. ( 2003). Understanding domestic victims’ decision-making in the justice system: Predicting desire for a criminal prosecution. Family Violence & Sexual Assault Bulletin, 19(2), 6-15.
5.
Bennett, L., Goodman, L., & Dutton, M.A. ( 1999). Systemic obstacles to the criminal prosecution of a battering partner: A victim perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 14, 761-772.
6.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. ( 2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
7.
Brewin, C.R., Andrews, B., & Valentine, J.D. (2000). Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 68, 748-766.
8.
Busch, R. ( 1994). "Don’t throw bouquets at me. (Judges) will say we’re in love": An analysis of New Zealand judges’ attitudes towards domestic violence. In J. Stubbs (Ed.), Women, male violence, and the law (pp. 104-146). Sydney, Australia: Institute of Criminology.
9.
Bybee, D.I., & Sullivan, C.M. (2002). The process through which an advocacy intervention resulted in positive change for battered women over time. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 103-132.
10.
Byrne, C.A., Kilpatrick, D.G., Beaty, D., & Howley, S.S. ( 1996). Victimization and psychological adjustment: Moderating effects of victim satisfaction with the criminal justice system. Paper presented at the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy Annual Convention, New York.
11.
Campbell, R., Wasco, S.M., Ahrens, C.E., Sefl, T., & Barnes, H.E. ( 2001). Preventing the "second rape": Rape survivors’ experiences with community service providers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1239-1259.
12.
Carlson, M.J., Harris, S.D., & Holden, G.W. ( 1999). Protective orders and domestic violence: Risk factors for re-abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 205-226.
13.
Davis, R.C., Smith, B.E., & Nickles, L. ( 1997). Prosecuting domestic violence cases with reluctant victims: Assessing two novel approaches in Milwaukee. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
14.
Downe-Wamboldt, B. ( 1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13, 313-321.
15.
Epstein, D. ( 1999). Effective intervention in domestic violence cases: Rethinking the roles of prosecutors, judges, and the court system. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 11, 3-50.
16.
Epstein, D., Bell, M.E., & Goodman, L.A. ( 2003). Transforming aggressive prosecution policies: Prioritizing victims’ long-term safety in the prosecution of domestic violence cases . Journal of Gender, Social Policy, & the Law, 11, 465-498.
17.
Erez, E., & Belknap, J. ( 1998). In their own words: Battered women’s assessment of the criminal processing system’s response. Violence & Victims, 13, 251-268.
18.
Finn, M.A. ( 2003). Effects of victims’ experiences with prosecutors on victim empowerment and re-occurrence of intimate partner violence, final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
19.
Fischer, K., & Rose, M. ( 1995). When "enough is enough": Battered women’s decision making around court orders of protection. Crime & Delinquency , 41, 414-429.
20.
Fleury-Steiner, R.E., Bybee, D.I., Sullivan, C.M., Belknap, J., & Melton, H.C. ( 2006). Contextual factors impacting battered women’s intentions to reuse the criminal legal system. Journal of Community Psychology , 34, 327-342.
21.
Ford, D.A. ( 1983). Wife battery and criminal justice: A study of victim decision-making. Family Relations: Journal of Applied Family & Child Studies, 32, 463-475.
22.
Ford, D.A. ( 1991). Prosecution as a victim power resource: A note on empowering women in violent conjugal relationships. Law & Society Review, 25, 313-334.
23.
Ford, D.A., & Regoli, M.J. ( 1992). The preventive impacts of policies for prosecuting wife batterers. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Domestic violence: The changing criminal justice response (pp. 181-207). Westport, CT : Auburn House.
24.
Ford, D.A., & Regoli, M.J. ( 1993). The criminal prosecution of wife assaulters: Process, problems, and effects. In N. Z. Hilton (Ed.), Legal responses to wife assault: Current trends and evaluation (pp. 127-164). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
25.
Franzosi, R.P. ( 2004). Content analysis. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 547-565). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
Gillis, J.R., Diamond, S.L., Jebely, P., Orekhovsky, V., Ostovich, E.M., MacIsaac, K., et al. (2006). Systemic obstacles to battered women’s participation in the judicial system: When will the status quo change? Violence Against Women, 12, 1150-1168.
27.
Goodman, L., Bennett, L., & Dutton, M.A. ( 1999). Obstacles to victims’ cooperation with the criminal prosecution of their abusers: The role of social support. Violence & Victims, 14, 427-444.
28.
Goodman, L., Dutton, M.A., & Bennett, L. ( 2000). Predicting repeat abuse among arrested batterers: Use of the Danger Assessment Scale in the criminal justice system. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 63, 63-73.
29.
Goodman, L.A., Dutton, M.A., Weinfurt, K., & Cook, S. ( 2003). The Intimate Partner Violence Strategies Index. Violence Against Women, 9, 163-186.
30.
Grauwiler, P., & Mills, L.G. ( 2004). Moving beyond the criminal justice paradigm: A radical restorative justice approach to intimate abuse. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 31, 49-69.
31.
Hanna, C. ( 1996). No right to choose: Mandated victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions. Harvard Law Review, 109, 1850-1910.
32.
Hare, S.C. ( 2006). What do battered women want? Victims’ opinions on prosecution. Violence & Victims, 21, 611-628.
33.
Hartley, C.C. ( 2001). "He said, she said": The defense attack of credibility in domestic violence felony trials. Violence Against Women , 7, 510-544.
34.
Hartley, C.C. ( 2003). A therapeutic jurisprudence approach to the trial process in domestic violence felony trials. Violence Against Women , 9, 410-437.
35.
Hightower, N.R., & Gorton, J. ( 2002). A case study of community-based responses to rural woman battering. Violence Against Women, 8, 845-872.
36.
Holt, V.L., Kernic, M.A., Lumley, T., Wolf, M.E., & Rivara, F.P. ( 2002). Civil protection orders and risk of subsequent police-reported violence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 589-594.
37.
Hotaling, G.T., & Buzawa, E.S. ( 2003). Forgoing criminal justice assistance: The non-reporting of new incidents of abuse in a court sample of domestic violence victims. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
38.
Jordan, C.E. ( 2004). Intimate partner violence and the justice system: An examination of the interface. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 19, 1412-1434.
39.
Konradi, A. ( 1996). Understanding rape survivors’ preparations for court: Accounting for the influence of legal knowledge, cultural stereotypes, personal efficacy, and prosecutor contact. Violence Against Women, 2, 25-62.
40.
Landau, T.C. ( 2000). Women’s experiences with mandatory charging for wife assault in Ontario, Canada: A case against the prosecution. International Review of Victimology, 7, 141-157.
41.
Levy, F., Ross, T., & Guthrie, P. ( 2008). Enhancing safety and justice for victims of domestic violence: Voices of women in the Queens integrated domestic violence court . New York: Vera Institute of Justice .
42.
Luborsky, M.R. ( 1994). The identification and analysis of themes and patterns . In J. F. Gubrium & A. Sanker (Eds.), Qualitative methods in aging research (pp. 189-210). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
43.
Ozer, E.J., Best, S.R., Lipsey, T.L., & Weiss, D.S. ( 2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 52-73.
44.
Paternoster, R., Bachman, R., Brame, R., & Sherman, L.W. ( 1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31, 163-204.
45.
Ptacek, J. ( 1999). Battered women in the courtroom: The power of judicial responses. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
46.
Sandelowski, M. ( 2000). Response to "Paradigms and presuppositions: The difference between qualitative and quantitative research." Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 14, 157-163.
47.
Smith, A. ( 2000). It’s my decision, isn’t it? A research note on battered women’s perceptions of mandatory intervention laws. Violence Against Women, 6, 1384-1402.
48.
Smith, A. ( 2001). Domestic violence laws: The voices of battered women . Violence & Victims, 16, 91-111.
49.
Soler, E. ( 1987). Domestic violence is a crime: A case study-San Francisco Family Violence Project. In D. J. Sonkin (Ed.), Domestic violence on trial: Psychological and legal dimensions of family violence (pp. 21-35). New York: Springer.
50.
Sullivan, C.M., & Bybee, D.I. ( 1999). Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 67, 43-53.
51.
Tan, C., Basta, J., Sullivan, C.M., & Davidson, W.S. (1995). The role of social support in the lives of women exiting domestic violence shelters: An experimental study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 437-451.
52.
Thompson, M.P., Kaslow, N.J., Kingree, J.B., Rashid, A., Puett, R., Jacobs, D., et al. (2000). Partner violence, social support, and distress among inner-city AfricanAmerican women. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 127-143.
53.
Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. ( 1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-191.
54.
Weisz, A.N. ( 2002). Prosecution of batterers: Views of African American battered women. Violence & Victims, 17, 19-34.
55.
Winick, B.J. ( 2000). Applying the law therapeutically in domestic violence cases. University of Missouri at Kansas City Law Review, 69, 33-91.
56.
Wooldredge, J., & Thistlewaite, A. (2002). Reconsidering domestic violence recidivism: Conditioned effects of legal controls by individual and aggregate levels of stake in conformity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 45-70.
57.
Zweig, J.M., Burt, M.R., & Van Ness, A. ( 2003). The effects on victims of victim service programs funded by the STOP formula grants program. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
