By conceptualizing abused women as victims or survivors, the literature offers two contradictory narratives of abused women. The aim of this article is to show that these two narratives are not mutually exclusive but rather can be used simultaneously to represent battered women’s existential experiences. The study sample was comprised of 20 Israeli battered women. Three in-depth interviews were conducted with each participant—twice for data collection purposes and once for validating the themes that emerged from the content analysis. “Strength trapped in weakness/weakness trapped in strength” was found to be a dominant theme in the life narratives of the interviewees. Most interviewees grew up in families of origin in distress; most were abused physically and emotionally. Although this anguish colored their lives with pain and turmoil, their experiences were the key to their ability to overcome difficulties. From the onset, interviewees’ lives were marked by a sense of threat and deprivation, but these very difficulties were also the source of a sense of power that emerged from the women’s struggle with their past. In their attempts to cope with and transcend the legacies of their past, interviewees’ feelings oscillated continuously between past and present, creating a unique powerful sense of simultaneously being victims and survivors. Implications for intervention are suggested.
Aldarondo, E., & Kantor, G.K. ( 1997). Social predictors of wife assault cessation. In G. K. Kantor & J. L. Jasinski (Eds.), Out of the darkness: Contemporary perspectives on family violence (pp. 183-193). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Andrews, B. ( 1992). Attribution processes in victims of marital violence: Who do women blame and why? In J. H. Harvey , T. L. Orbuch, & A. L. Weber (Eds.), Attributions, accounts, and close relationships (pp. 177-193). New York: Springer-Verlag.
3.
Angen, M.J. ( 2000). Evaluating interpretive inquiry: Reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qualitative Health Research , 10, 378-395.
4.
Avakame, E.F. ( 1998). Intergenerational transmission of violence, self-control, and conjugal violence: A comparative analysis of physical violence and psychological aggression. Violence and Victims, 13, 301-316.
5.
Baker, P.L. ( 1997). And I went back: Battered women’s negotiation of choice. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 26, 55-74.
6.
Bakhtin, L. ( 1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
7.
Barnett, O.W., & LaViolette, A.D. (1993). It could happen to anyone: Why battered women stay. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Bowker, L.H. ( 1993). A battered woman’s problems are social, not psychological . In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 154-165). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Bruner, J. ( 1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Campbell, J., Rose, L., Kub, J., & Nedd, D. ( 1998). Voices of strength and resistance: A contextual and longitudinal analysis of women’s responses to battering. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 743-762.
11.
Cavanagh, K. ( 2003). Understanding women’s responses to domestic violence . Qualitative Social Work, 2, 229-249.
12.
Chambon, A. S., Irving, A. , & Epstein, L. (Eds.). (1999). Reading Foucault for social work. New York: Columbia University Press.
13.
Creswell, J.W. ( 1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
14.
Davis, R.E. ( 2002). "The strongest women": Exploration of the inner resources of abused women. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 1248-1263.
15.
Dutton, D.G., & Painter, S. ( 1993). Battered woman syndrome: Effects of severity and intermittency of abuse. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63, 614-627.
16.
Eisikovits, Z., Goldblatt, H., & Winstok, Z. ( 1999). Partner accounts of intimate violence: Towards a theoretical model. Families in Society, 80, 606-619.
17.
Follingstad, D.R., Neckerman, A.P., & Vormbrock, J. ( 1988). Reactions to victimization and coping strategies of battered women: The ties that bind. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 373-390.
18.
Foucault, M. ( 1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings . New York: Pantheon.
19.
Goldner, V. ( 1992, March/April). Making room for both/and. Family Therapy Networker, 55-61.
20.
Gondolf, E.W. ( 1998). Assessing woman battering in mental health services. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Gondolf, E.W., & Fisher, E.R. ( 1988). Battered women as survivors: An alternative to treating learned helplessness. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
22.
Hague, G., Mullender, A., & Aris, R. ( 2003). Is anybody listening? Accountability and women survivors of domestic violence. London: Routledge .
23.
Hamby, S.L., & Gray-Little, B. (1997). Responses to partner violence: Moving away from deficit models. Journal of Family Psychology , 11, 339-350.
24.
Hammersley, M. ( 1995). Theory and evidence in qualitative research. Quality and Quantity, 29, 55-66.
25.
Hill, C., Thompson, B.J., & Williams, E.N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. Counseling Psychologist, 25, 517-572.
26.
Hotaling, G.T., & Sugarman, D.B. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge. Violence and Victims, 1, 101-124.
27.
Humphreys, C., & Thiara, R. ( 2003). Mental health and domestic violence: "I call it symptoms of abuse." British Journal of Social Work, 33, 209-226.
28.
Hyden, M. ( 1994). Woman battering as marital act: The construction of a violent marriage. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
29.
Irving, A., & Young, T. ( 2002). Paradigm for pluralism: Mikhail Bakhtin and social work practice. Social Work, 47, 19-29.
30.
Johnson, M.P. ( 1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family , 57, 283-294.
31.
Johnson, M.P., & Ferraro, K.J. ( 2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions . Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 948-963.
32.
Kelly, L. ( 1988). How women define their experiences of violence. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 114-132). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
Kemp, A., Green, B.L., Hovanitz, C., & Rawlings, E.I. (1995). Incidence and correlates of posttraumatic stress disorder in battered women: Shelter and community samplesJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 43-55.
34.
Kvale, S. ( 1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Kwong, M.J., Bartholomew, K., Henderson, A.Z., & Trinke, S.J. ( 2003). The intergenerational transmission of relationship violence . Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 288-301.
36.
Lamb, S. ( 1999). Constructing the victim: Popular images and lasting labels . In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 108-138). New York: New York University Press.
37.
Lempert, L.B. ( 1996). Women’s strategies for survival: Developing agency in abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 269-289.
38.
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. ( 1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. ( 1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40.
Malone, J., Tyree, A., & O’Leary, K.D. (1989). Generalization and containment: Different effects of past aggression for wives and husbands. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51, 687-697.
41.
Maxwell, J.A. ( 2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
42.
McLeod, J. ( 2001). Qualitative research in counseling and psychotherapy . London: Sage.
43.
McMillen, J.C. ( 1999). Better for it: How people benefit from adversity. Social Work, 44, 455-467.
44.
Miller, S.L., & Meloy, M.L. ( 2006). Women’s use of force: Voices of women arrested for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 89-115.
45.
Mullender, A., & Hague, G. ( 2005). Giving a voice to women survivors of domestic violence through recognition as a service user group. British Journal of Social Work, 35,1321-1341.
46.
Padgett, D. ( 1998). Qualitative methods in social work research: Challenges and rewards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
Patton, M.Q. ( 2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
Peled, E., Eisikovits, Z., Enosh, G., & Winstok, Z. ( 2000). Choice and empowerment for battered women who stay: Toward a constructivist model. Social Work, 45, 9-25.
49.
Profitt, N.J. ( 1996). "Battered women" as "victims" and "survivors": Creating a space for resistance. Canadian Social Work Review, 13, 23-38.
50.
Roberts, A.R. ( 2002). Duration and severity of woman battering: A conceptual model/ continuum. In A. R. Roberts (Ed.), Handbook of domestic violence intervention strategies: Policies, programs, and legal remedies (pp. 64-79). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51.
Roche, S.E. ( 1999). Using a strengths perspective for social work practice with abused women. Journal of Family Social Work, 3, 23-37.
52.
Roche, S.E., & Wood, G.G. ( 2005). A narrative principle for feminist social work with survivors of male violence. Affilia, 20, 465-475.
53.
Rosen, K.H., Stith, S.M., Few, A.L., Daly, K.L., & Tritt, D.R. ( 2005). A qualitative investigation of Johnson’s typology . Violence Against Women, 20, 319-334.
54.
Rubin, H.J., & Rubin, I.S. ( 2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
Saleebey, D. ( 2002). The strengths perspective: Possibilities and problems . In D. Saleebey (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (3rd ed., pp. 264-286). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
56.
Sartre, J.P. ( 1956). Being and nothingness: An essay in phenomenology ontology. (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). New York: Philosophical Library.
57.
Saunders, D.G. ( 1994). Post-traumatic stress symptom profiles of battered women: A comparison of survivors in two settings. Violence and Victims , 9, 31-44.
58.
Schofield, J.W. ( 1993). Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research . In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Social research: Philosophy, politics and practice (pp. 200-225). London: Sage.
59.
Seale, C. ( 1999). The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage.
60.
Senter, K.E. ( 2002). Spirituality and the maintenance of change: A phenomenological study of women who leave abusive relationships. Contemporary Family Therapy, 24, 543-564.
61.
Shkedi, A. ( 2005). Multiple case narrative. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
62.
Spinelli, E. ( 1989). The interpreted world: An introduction to phenomenological psychology. London: Sage.
63.
Stiles, W.B. ( 1993). Quality control in qualitative research. Clinical Psychological Review, 13, 593-618.
64.
Stith, M.S., Rosen, K.H., Middleton, K.A., Busch, A.L., Lundeberg, K., & Carlton, R.P. ( 2000). The intergenerational transmission of spouse abuse: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 640-654.
65.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
66.
Sugarman, D.B., Aldarondo, E., & Boney-McCoy, S. (1996). Risk marker analysis of husband-to-wife violence: A continuum of aggression. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 313-337.
67.
Synder, D.K., & Fruchtman, L.A. (1981). Differential patterns of wife abuse: A data-based typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 878-885.
68.
Valle, R.S., & King, M. ( 1978). An introduction to existential-phenomenological thought in psychology. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 3-17). New York: Oxford University Press.
69.
van Manen, M. ( 2001). Researching lived experiences. London, Ontario, Canada: Althouse Press.
70.
Wade, A. ( 1987). Small acts of living: Everyday resistance to violence and other forms of oppression. Contemporary Family Therapy , 19, 23-39.
71.
Walker, L.E. ( 1993). The battered woman syndrome is a psychological consequence of abuse. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 133-153). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
72.
Weiss, R.S. ( 1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative intervew studies. New York: Free Press.
73.
White, M., & Epston, D. ( 1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: Norton.
74.
Wood, G.G., & Roche, S.E. ( 2001). Situations and representations: Feminist practice with survivors of male violence. Families in Society, 82, 583-590.
