Research suggests that situational characteristics influence attributions for violent events. The present study examined the effect of confrontational female behavior on women’s positive and negative attributions for their boyfriends’ abusive behavior and the influence of confrontational behavior and attributions on intentions to remain involved with those partners. College women (N = 293) read descriptions of scenes that involved dating conflict and provided attribution ratings and stay/leave intentions. Results showed that female behavior predicted positive and negative attributions as well as behavioral intentions. Individual differences were less critical to the prediction of attributions or intentions. Limitations, future directions, and clinical implications are discussed.
Andrews, B., & Brewin, C.R. ( 1990). Attributions of blame for marital violence: A study of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 757-767.
2.
Archer, J. ( 2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680.
3.
Barnett, O., Martinez, T.E., & Keyson, M. ( 1996). The relationship between violence, social support, and self-blame in battered women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 11, 221-235.
4.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. ( 1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5.
Borochowitz, D.Y., & Eisikovits, Z. (2002). To love violently: Strategies for reconciling love and violence. Violence Against Women , 8, 476-492.
6.
Bowen, N.H. ( 1982). Guidelines for career counseling with abused women. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 31, 123-127.
7.
Esqueda, C.W., & Harrison, L.A. (2005). The influence of gender role stereotypes, the woman’s race, and level of provocation and resistance on domestic violence culpability attributions. Sex Roles, 53, 821-835.
8.
Fincham, F.D., & Bradbury, T.N. (1992). Assessing attributions in marriage: The Relationship Attribution Measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 457-468.
9.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. ( 1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10.
Gray, H.M., & Foshee, V. ( 1997). Adolescent dating violence: Differences between one-sided and mutually violent profiles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 12, 126-141.
11.
Heider, F. ( 1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
12.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Bates, L., Smultzler, N., & Sandin, E. ( 1997). A brief review of the research on husband violence: Part I: Maritally violent versus nonviolent men. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 2, 65-99.
13.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Hutchinson, G. (1993). Attributing negative intent to wife behavior: The attributions of violent versus nonviolent men. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 206-211.
14.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Jacobsen, N., Fehrenbach, P. & Fruzzeti, A. ( 1992). Violent married couples’ attributions for violent and nonviolent self and partner behavior. Behavioral Assessment , 14, 53-64.
15.
Kasian, M., & Painter, S.L. ( 1992). Frequency and severity of psychological abuse in a dating population. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 350-364.
16.
Katz, J., & Arias, I. ( 2001). Women’s attributions for hypothetical dating violence: Effects of partner alcohol use and violence severity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1458-1473.
17.
Katz, J., Arias, I., Beach, S., Brody, G., & Roman, P. ( 1995). Excuses, excuses: Accounting for the effects of partner violence on marital satisfaction and stability. Violence and Victims, 10, 315-326.
18.
Katz, J., Street, A., & Arias, I. ( 1997). Individual differences in self-appraisals and responses to dating violence scenarios. Violence and Victims, 12, 256-276.
19.
Kelley, H.H. ( 1967). Attribution and learning in social psychology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
20.
Kelley, H.H. ( 1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 105-128.
21.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Schlee, K.A., Monson, C.M., Ehrensaft, M., & Heyman, R. ( 1998). What’s love got to do with it? Perceptions of marital positivity in h-to-w aggressive, distressed, and happy marriages. Journal of Family Violence, 13, 197-213.
22.
Lewis, S.F., & Fremouw, W. ( 2001). Dating violence: A critical review of the literature . Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 105-127.
23.
Lo, W.A., & Sporakowski, M.J. (1989). The continuation of violent dating relationships among college students. Journal of College Student Development, 30, 432-439.
24.
Moore, T.M., Eisler, R.M., & Franchina, J.J. (2000). Causal attributions to provocative dating situations by abusive and non-abusive males. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 69-80.
25.
Neufeld, J., McNamara, J., & Ertl, M. ( 1999). Incidence and prevalence of dating partner abuse and its relationship to dating practices. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 125-137.
26.
Overholser, J.C., & Moll, S.H. ( 1990). Who’s to blame: Attributions regarding causality in spouse abuse. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 8, 107-120.
27.
Pape, K.T., & Arias, I. ( 1995). Control, coping, and victimization in dating relationships . Violence and Victims, 10, 43-54.
28.
Pape, K.T., & Arias, I. ( 2000). The role of perceptions and attributions in battered women’s intentions to permanently end their violent relationships. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 201-214.
29.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M.E.P. (1983). Learned helplessness and victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 103-116.
30.
Rhatigan, D.L., & Axsom, D.K. ( 2006). Using the Investment Model to understand battered women’s commitment to their abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 21, 153-162.
31.
Rhatigan, D.L., Moore, T.M., & Stuart, G.L. ( 2005). An investment model analysis of relationship stability among women court-mandated to violence interventions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 313-322.
32.
Rhatigan, D.L., & Street, A.E. ( 2005). The impact of intimate partner violence on decisions to leave dating relationships: A test of the investment model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1580-1597.
33.
Rhatigan, D.L., Street, A.E., & Axsom, D.A. ( 2006). A critical review of theories to explain violent relationship termination: Implications for research and intervention. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 321-345.
34.
Riggs, D.S. ( 1993). Relationship problems and dating aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 18-35.
35.
Rosenberg, M. ( 1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
Rusbult, C.E. ( 1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associates: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172-186.
37.
Rusbult, C.E., & Martz, J.M. ( 1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558-571.
38.
Seligman, M.E.P. ( 1975). Helplessness. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
39.
Straus, M.A. ( 1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
40.
Straus, M.A., Hamby, S.L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D.B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
41.
Sugarman, D.B., & Hotaling, G.T. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context and risk markers. In M. A. S. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 3-30). New York: Praeger.
42.
Truman-Schram, D.M., Cann, A., Galhoun, L., & Vanwallendael, L. (2000). Leaving an abusive dating relationship: An investment model comparison of women who stay versus women who leave. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 161-183.
43.
Walker, L.E. ( 1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row.
44.
Williams, S.L., & Frieze, I.H. ( 2005). Patterns of violent relationships, psychological distress, and marital satisfaction in a national sample of men and women. Sex Roles, 52, 771-785.
