This article draws on narratives of volunteers working with women who have experienced violence. It explores how institutional discourses nurture a culture of blame and responsibility. Using qualitative data, it examines the ways in which women victims are seen as complicit in their own victimization. An indirect consequence of the blame/responsibility dichotomy is that victims are depicted as deserving their fate. There is, therefore, a culture of resignation in which violence is normalized. It proposes that if institutional practices are embedded in a feminist tradition, they can provide a more sustainable framework for challenging sexual and domestic violence.
Anderson, K., & Umberson, D. ( 2001). Gendering violence: Masculinity and power in men’s accounts of domestic violence. Gender & Society, 15, 358-380.
2.
Baker, L.P. ( 1997). "And I went back": Battered women’s negotiation of choice. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 26, 55-74.
3.
Barnett, O.W. ( 2000). Why battered women do not leave, Part 1: External exhibiting factors within society. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 1, 343-372.
4.
Berns, N. ( 2001). Degendering the problem and gendering the blame: Political discourse on women and violence. Gender & Society, 15, 262-281.
5.
Berns, N., & Schweingruber, D. (2007). "When you’re involved, it’s just different": Making sense of domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 13, 240-261.
6.
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. ( 1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.
7.
Birch, M., & Miller, T. ( 2000). Inviting intimacy: The interview as therapeutic opportunity . International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3, 189-202.
8.
Boateng, P. ( 1999, November 24-25). Living without fear: An agenda for action. Speech made at the Home Office Special Conference on Violence Against Women . Retrieved March 1, 2007, from http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/dometsicviolence/pbspeech.htm
9.
Bunch, C., & Carrillo, R. ( 1992). Gender violence: A development and human rights issue . Dublin, Ireland: Attic Press.
10.
Caplan, P. ( 1991). How do they decide who is normal? The bizarre but true tale of the DSM process. Canadian Psychology, 32, 162-170.
11.
Collins, P. ( 1998). Negotiating selves: Reflections on "unstructured" interviewing . Sociological Research Online, 3. Retrieved from November 2, 2009, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/3/3/2.html
12.
Corrin, C. (Ed.). (1996). Women in a violent world: Feminist analyses and resistance across Europe. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
13.
Cosgrove, K. ( 1996). No man has the right. In C. Corrin (Ed.), Women in a violent world: Feminist analyses and resistance across Europe (pp. 186-203). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
14.
Crenshaw, K.W. ( 1994). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. In M. Fineman & R. Mykitiuk (Eds.), The public nature of private violence (pp. 93-121). New York: Routledge.
Dobash, R.E., & Dobash, R.P. ( 1992). Women, violence and social change. London: Routledge.
17.
Dobash, R.E., & Dobash, R.P. ( 1997). Violence against women. In L. O’Toole & J. R. Schiffman (Eds.), Gender violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 266-279). New York: New York University Press.
18.
Dunn, L.J., & Powell-Williams, M. (2007). "Everybody makes choices": Victim advocates and the social construction of battered women’s victimization and agency. Violence Against Women, 13, 977-1001.
19.
Eisikovits, Z., & Buchbinder, E. (1999). Talking control: Metaphors used by battered women. Violence Against Women, 5, 845-868.
20.
Fairclough, N. ( 1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language . London: Longman.
21.
Field, C.A., Caetano R., & Nelson, S. ( 2004). Alcohol and violence related cognitive risk factors associated with the perpetration of intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 19, 249-253.
22.
Finney, A. ( 2004). Alcohol and intimate partner violence: Key findings from the research. London: Home Office, Communications Development Unit.
23.
Foucault, M. ( 1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
24.
Fraser, H. ( 2005). Women, love, and intimacy "gone wrong": Fire, wind and ice. Affilia, 20(1), 10-20.
25.
Gardner, C.B. ( 1990). Safe conduct: Women, crime and self in public places . Social Problems, 37, 311-327.
26.
Hague, G. ( 1998). Interagency work and domestic violence in the UK. Women’s Studies International Forum, 21, 441-449.
27.
Hague G., & Mullender, A. ( 2006). Who listens? The voices of domestic violence survivors in service provision in the United Kingdom. Violence Against Women, 12, 568-587.
28.
Hanmer, J., & Maynard, M. (Ed.). (1987). Women, violence and social control. London: Macmillan.
29.
Hearn, J. ( 1998). The violences of men: How men talk about and how agencies respond to men’s violence to women. Sage: London.
30.
Hester, M., Kelly, L. , & Radford, J. (Eds.). (1996). Women, violence and male power. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
31.
Hester, M., Pearson, C., & Harwin, N. ( 1998). Making an impact: Children and domestic violence. A reader . Essex, UK: Barnardo’s.
32.
Hill Collins, P. ( 1998). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race and nation. Hypatia, 13, 62-82.
33.
Hirschmann, N.J. ( 1997). Toward a feminist theory of freedom. In M. L. Shanley & U. Narayan (Eds.), Reconstructing political theory: Feminist perspectives (pp. 195-210). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
34.
Holstein, J.A., & Gubrium, J.F. ( 2000). The self we live by: Narrative identity in a post-modern world. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Home Office. (2004). The Victim’s Charter: A statement of service standards for victims of crime. London: Criminal Justice System.
36.
hooks, b. ( 1997). Violence in intimate relationships: A feminist perspective . In L. O’Toole & J. Schiffman (Eds.), Gender violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 279-285). New York: New York University Press.
37.
House of Commons, Committee of Public Accounts. ( 2003). Helping victims and witnesses: The work of victim support (Seventeenth Report of Session 2002-2003). London: Stationery Office Limited.
38.
Josselson, R. ( 2004). The hermeneutics of faith and the hermeneutics of suspicion . Narrative Inquiry, 14, 1-28.
39.
Kelly, L. ( 1988). Surviving sexual violence. Cambridge , UK: Polity.
40.
Kelly, L. ( 1996). When does the speaking profit us? Reflections on the challenges of developing feminist perspectives on abuse and violence by women . In M. Hester, L. Kelly, & J. Radford (Eds.), Women, violence and male power: Feminist activism, research and practice (pp. 34-49). Buckingham , UK: Open University Press.
41.
Kelly, L., Burton, S., & Regan, L. ( 1996). Beyond victim or survivor: Sexual violence, identity and feminist theory and practice. In L. Adkins & V. Merchant (Eds.), Sexualizing the social: Power and the organization of sexuality (pp. 77-101). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Press.
42.
Kelly, L., & Radford, J. ( 1996). "Nothing really happened." The invalidation of women’s experiences. In M. Hester, L. Kelly, & J. Radford (Eds.), Women, violence and male power (pp. 19-33). Buckingham , UK: Open University Press.
43.
Kendrick, K. ( 1998). Producing the battered woman: Shelter politics and the power of feminist voice. In N. Naples (Ed.), Community activism and feminist politics: Organizing across race, class and gender (pp. 151-173). New York: Routledge .
44.
Lamb, S. ( 1996). The trouble with blame: Victims, perpetrators and responsibility . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
Lamb, S. ( 1999). Constructing the victim: Popular images and lasting labels . In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 108-139). New York: New York University Press.
46.
Lea, J.S. ( 2007). A discursive investigation into victim responsibility in rape. Feminism and Psychology, 17, 495-514.
47.
Lempert, L.B. ( 1997). The other side of help: Negative effects in the help-seeking processes of abused women. Qualitative Sociology, 20, 289-308.
48.
Loseke, D.R. ( 1992). The battered woman and shelters: The social construction of wife abuse. Albany: State University of New York Press.
49.
Loseke, D.R. ( 1999). Thinking about social problems: An introduction to constructionist perspectives. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
50.
Loseke, D.R. ( 2001). Lived realities and formula stories of "battered women ." In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Institutional selves: Troubled identities in a post-modern world (pp. 107-126). New York: Oxford University Press.
51.
MacCannell, D., & MacCannell, J.F. (1993). Violence, power and pleasure: A revisionist reading of Foucault from the victim perspective. In C. Ramazanoğlu (Ed.), Up against Foucault: Explorations of some tensions between Foucault and feminism (pp. 203-238). London: Routledge.
52.
Malos, E. ( 2000). Supping with the devil?: Multi-agency initiatives on domestic violence. In J. Radford, L. Harne, & M. Friedberg (Eds.), Women, violence and strategies for action: Feminist research, policy and practice (pp. 120-136). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
53.
Mama, A. ( 1989). The hidden struggle: Statutory and voluntary sector responses to violence against Black women in the home. London: London Race and Housing Research Unit.
54.
Mason, J. ( 2002). Qualitative interviewing: Asking, listening and interpreting . In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 225-241). London: Sage.
55.
Maynard, M. ( 1993). Violence towards women. In D. Richardson & V. Robinson (Eds.), Introducing women’s studies: Feminist theory and practice (pp. 99-122). London : Macmillan.
56.
McDermott, J.M., & Garofalo, J. ( 2004). When advocacy for domestic violence victims backfires: Types and sources of victim disempowerment. Violence Against Women, 10, 1245-1266
57.
McLaughlin, J. ( 2003). Feminist social and political theory: Contemporary debates and dialogues. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
58.
Mezey, G., & Stanko, E. ( 1996). Women and violence. In K. Abel, M. Buszewicz, & E. Staples (Eds.), Planning community mental health services for women: A multiprofessional handbook (pp. 160-175). Routledge: London.
59.
Miller, T., & Bell, L. ( 2002). Consenting to what? Issues of access, gate-keeping and "informed" consent. In M. Mauthner, M. Birch, & T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 53-69). London : Sage.
60.
Morgan, K. ( 2005). Violence against women: The discursive construction of a culture of resignation. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Bristol, UK.
61.
Morgan, K. ( 2006). Cheating wives and vice girls: The construction of a culture of resignation. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29, 489-498.
62.
Morgan, K., & Thapar-Björkert, S. (2006). "I’d rather you’d lay me on the floor and start kicking me": Understanding symbolic violence in everyday life. Women’s Studies International Forum , 29, 441-452.
63.
National Audit Office. (2002, 23 October). Helping victims and witnesses: The work of Victim Support (2001-2002) (Report by the Comptroller and Auditor-General HC1212. Session 2001-2002) . London: The Stationery Office .
64.
National Statistics Online. (2001). Neighbourhood statistics: Neighbourhood profile. Retrieved 30 March, 2005, from http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/AreaProfile2.do?tab=2
65.
Ollett, B. ( 1994, April). Alcohol and crime: A Women’s Aid perspective: Causes of domestic violence. Paper presented at the conference From Problems to Solutions: Alcohol and Crime, Carmarthen, UK.
66.
Pahl, J. (Ed.). (1985). Private violence and public policy: The needs of battered women and the response of the public services. London: Routledge.
67.
Patel, P. ( 1999). The multi-agency approach to domestic violence: A panacea or obstacle to women’s struggles for freedom from violence. In N. Harwin, G. Hague, & E. Malos (Eds.), The multi-agency approach to domestic violence: New opportunities, old challenges? (pp. 172-190). London: Whiting and Birch.
68.
Peled, E., Eisikovits, Z., Enosh, G., & Winstok, Z. ( 2000). Choice and empowerment for battered women who stay: Towards a constructivist model. Social Work, 45, 9-25.
69.
Pence, E. ( 2005, March). Violence against women: Coordinating activism, research and service provision conference. Plenary at the ESRC seminar, University of Bristol, UK.
70.
Pence, E., & McMahon, M. ( 1999). Duluth: A coordinated community response to domestic violence. In N. Harwin, G. Hague, & E. Malos (Eds.), The multi-agency approach to domestic violence: New opportunities, old challenges? (pp. 180-194). London: Whiting and Birch.
71.
Radford, J., & Russell, D. E. H. (Eds.). (1992). Femicide: The politics of woman killing. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
72.
Radford, J., & Stanko, E.A. ( 1996). Violence against women and children: The contradictions of crime control under patriarchy. In M. Hester , L. Kelly, & J. Radford (Eds.), Women, violence and male power (pp. 142-157). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
73.
Ricoeur, P. ( 1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
74.
Rothenberg, B. ( 2003). "We don’t have time for social change": Cultural compromise and the battered woman syndrome. Gender & Society , 17, 771-786.
75.
Smart, C. ( 1989). Feminism and the power of law. London : Routledge.
76.
Smart, C., & Smart, B. ( 1978). Accounting for rape: Reality and myth in press reporting . In C. Smart & B. Smart (Eds.), Women, sexuality and social control (pp. 10-23). London: Routledge .
77.
Spackman, P. ( 2000). Victim support handbook: Helping people cope with crime . London: Hodder and Stoughton.
78.
Stanko, E.A. ( 1985). Intimate intrusions: Women’s experience of male violence. London: Routledge.
79.
Stanko, E.A. ( 1990). When precaution is normal: A feminist critique of crime prevention. In L. Gelsthorpe & A. Morris (Eds.), Feminist perspectives in criminology (pp. 171-183). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
80.
Stanko, E. A. (Ed.). (2003). The meanings of violence. London: Routledge.
81.
Stanko, E.A. ( 2006). Theorizing about violence: Observations from the Economic and Social Research Council’s Violence Research Programme. Violence Against Women, 12, 543-555.
82.
Thompson, J.B. ( 1981). Critical hermeneutics: A study in the thought of Paul Ricoeur and Jürgen Habermas, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
83.
Tisdall, E.K.M. ( 2003). The rising tide of female violence? Researching girls’ own understandings and experiences of violent behavior. In R. M. Lee & E. A. Stanko (Eds.), Researching violence: Essays on methodology and measurement (pp. 137-153). London: Routledge .
84.
Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. ( 2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: Sage.
85.
Van Dijk, T.A. ( 1997). Discourse as interaction in society. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourses as social interaction (pp. 1-37). London: Sage.
86.
Victim Support. (n.d.). Rape and sexual assault: Information for women. London: Author. Victim Support. (2003). Resource pack for supporting victims of domestic violence. London: Victim Support National Office.
87.
Victim Support. ( 2005). Service Personnel and Equal Opportunities Survey report 2004. London: Victim Support National Office, Research and Development Department.
88.
Victim Support. ( 2006). Victim and witness review: Annual report and accounts . London: Author.
89.
Victim Support. ( 2007). Handbook on delivering Victim Support’s enhanced services (Interim version). London: Victim Support National Office.
90.
Victim Support Magazine. (1998, Autumn). London : Author.
91.
Von Hentig, H. ( 1948). The criminal and his victim. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
92.
Walklate, S. ( 2003). Can there be a feminist victimology? In P. Davies, P. Francis, & V. Jupp (Eds.), Victimisation: Theory, research and policy (pp. 28-45). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
93.
Weaver, C.K. ( 1998). Crimewatch UK: Keeping women off the streets. In C. Carter, G. Branston, & S. Allan (Eds.), News, gender and power (pp. 248-262). London: Routledge.
94.
Westlund, A. ( 1999). Pre-modern and modern power: Foucault and the case of domestic violence. Signs, 24, 1046-1066.
95.
Williams, B. ( 1999). The Victim’s Charter: Citizens as consumers of criminal justice services. Howard Journal, 38, 384-396.
96.
Wodak, R. ( 1996). Disorders of discourse. London: Longman.
97.
Wolfgang, M.E. ( 1958). Patterns in criminal homicide. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
98.
Yeatman, A. ( 1997). Feminism and power. In M. L. Shanley & U. Narayan (Eds.), Reconstructing political theory: Feminist perspectives (pp. 144-157). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
