Basile, K.C., Hertz, M.F., & Back, S.E. ( 2007). Intimate partner violence and sexual violence victimization assessment instruments for use in healthcare settings: Version 1. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
2.
Coker, A.L., Smith, P.H., & Fadden, M.K. ( 2005). Intimate partner violence and disabilities among women attending family practice clinics. Journal of Women’s Health, 14, 829-838.
3.
Curry, M.A., Hassouneh-Phillips, D., & Johnston-Silverberg, A. (2001). Abuse of women with disabilities: An ecological model and review. Violence Against Women, 7, 60-79.
4.
Curry, M.A., Powers, L.E., & Oschwald, M. ( 2003). Development of an abuse screening tool for women with disabilities. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma , 8(4), 123-141.
5.
Fisher, B.S. ( 2009). The effects of survey question wording on rape estimates: Evidence from a quasi-experimental design. Violence Against Women, 15, 133-147.
6.
Fisher, B.S., & Cullen, F.C. ( 2000). Measuring the sexual victimization of women: Evolution, current controversies, and future research. In D. Duffee (Ed.), Measurement and analysis of crime and justice, Criminal justice 2000 volumes (pp. 317-390). Washington, DC : National Institute of Justice.
7.
Koss, M.P., Abbey, A., Campbell, R., Cook, S., Norris, J., Testa, M., et al. (2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 357-370.
8.
Lauritsen, J.L. ( 2005). Social and scientific influences on the measurement of criminal victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 21, 245-266.
9.
Martin, S.L., Ray, N., Sotres-Alvarez, D., Kupper, L.L., Moracco, K.E., Dickens, P.A., et al. (2006). Physical and sexual assault of women with disabilities. Violence Against Women, 12, 823-837.
10.
McFarlane, J., Hughes, R., Nosek, M., Groff, J., Swedland, N., & Mullens, P. ( 2001). Abuse Assessment Screen-Disability (AAS-D): Measuring frequency, type, and perpetrator of abuse toward women with physical disabilities . Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine , 10, 861-866.
11.
Nosek, M.A., Hughes, R.B., Taylor, H.B., & Taylor, P. ( 2006). Disability, psychosocial, and demographic characteristics of abused women with disabilities. Violence Against Women , 12, 838-850.
12.
Rountree, P.W., & Land, K.C. ( 1996). Perceived risk versus fear of crime: Empirical evidence of conceptually distinct reactions in survey data. Social Forces, 74, 1352-1376.
13.
Saltzman, L.E., Fanslow, J.L., McMahon, P.M., & Shelley, G.A. ( 2002). Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements, Version 2. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
14.
Soeken, K., McFarlane, J., Parker, B., & Lominack, M. ( 1998). The Abuse Assessment Screen. In J. Campbell (Ed.), Empowering survivors of abuse: Healthcare for battered women and children (pp. 195-203). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Thompson, M.P., Basile, K.C., Hertz, M.F., & Sitterle, D. ( 2006). Measuring intimate partner violence and perpetration: A compendium of assessment tools. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
16.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. ( 2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
17.
Tourangeau, R., & McNeely, M.E. ( 2002). Measuring crime and crime victimization: Methodological issues. In J. V. Pepper & C. V. Petrie (Eds.), Measurement problems in criminal justice research (pp. 10-42). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.