The implementation of a screening and referral system for supplemental mental health treatment among batterer program participants was investigated in a 2-year formative evaluation. The research team conducted direct observation of the agency procedures, participation in training and supervision meetings, debriefing interviews with administrators, and informal conversations with staff and clients. Inconsistencies and breakdowns associated with nearly every step of the screening and referral process were identified, for example, notification of referral instructions and verification of clinical compliance. Court sanctions for referral noncompliance remained inconsistent even during court-mandated referral. Several underlying issues were also exposed: administrative absenteeism and turnover, administrative-staff gaps, client overload, and differing agency priorities. These issues reinforce the challenges facing coordinated community response.
Allen, N. (2006). An examination of the effectiveness of domestic violence coordinating councils. Violence Against Women, 12, 46-67.
2.
Allen, N., Watt, K., & Hess, J. (2008). A qualitative study of the activities and outcomes of domestic violence coordinating councils. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 63-73.
3.
Bennett, L., Stoops, C., Call, C., & Flett, H. (2007). Program completion and re-arrest in a batterer intervention system. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 42-54.
4.
California State Auditor. (2006, November). Batterer intervention programs: County probation departments, the courts and program compliance. Sacramento, CA: Bureau of State Audits.
5.
Derogatis, L. (1993). BSI: Brief Symptom Inventory administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research.
6.
Dobash, R.E., & Dobash, R.P. (2000). Evaluating criminal justice interventions for domestic violence. Crime and Delinquency, 46, 252-271.
7.
Gamache, D.J., Edleson, J.L., & Schock, M.D. (1988). Coordinated police, judicial, and social service response to woman battering: A multiple-baseline evaluation across three communities . In G. T. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. T. Kirkpatrick , & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Coping with family violence: Research and policy perspectives (pp. 193-209). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Gondolf, E. (1999a). MCMI results for batterer program participants in four cities: Less "pathological" than expected. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 1-17.
9.
Gondolf, E. (1999b). Characteristics of court-mandated batterers in four cities: Diversity and dichotomies. Violence Against Women , 5, 1277-1293.
10.
Gondolf, E. (2000). Mandatory court review and batterer program compliance . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 438-437.
11.
Gondolf, E. (2007a). Supplemental mental health treatment for batterer program participants. Final report submitted to theNational Institute of Justice, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
12.
Gondolf, E. (2007b). Culturally-focused batterer counseling for African American men: A clinical trial of re-assault and re-arrest outcomes. Criminology and Public Policy, 6, 341-366.
13.
Gondolf, E. (2008a). Outcomes of case management for African American men in batterer counseling. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 173-181.
14.
Gondolf, E. (2008b). Implementation of case management for batterer program participants. Violence Against Women, 14, 208-225.
15.
Greenwood, D., & Levin, M. (2006). An introduction to action research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Harrell, A., Newmark, L., Visher, C., & Castro, J. (2006). Final report on the evaluation of the Judicial Oversight Demonstration (Volume 1): The impact of JOD in Dorchester and Washtenaw County. Washington, DC: Urban Institute .
18.
Jones, A., D'Agostino, R., Gondolf, E., & Heckert, A. (2004). Assessing the effect of batterer program completion on reassault using propensity scores. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1002-1020.
19.
Labriola, M., Rempel, M., O'Sullivian, C., & Frank, P. (2007, March). Court responses to batterer program noncompliance: A national perspective. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
20.
Mederos, F. (2002). Changing our visions of intervention: The evolution of programs for physically abusive men. In E. Aldarondo & F. Mederos (Eds.), Men who batter: Intervention and prevention strategies in a diverse society (pp. 1-2-1-26). New York: Civic Research Institute.
21.
Murphy, C.M., Musser, P.H., & Maton, K.I. (1998). Coordinated community intervention for domestic abusers: Intervention system involvement and criminal recidivism. Journal of Family Violence, 13, 263-284.
22.
Pawson, R., & Tilly, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Pence, E., & McDonnell, C. (1999). Developing policies and protocols. In E. Pence & M. Shepard (Eds.), Coordinated community response to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond (pp. 41-64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Pence, E., & Shepard, M. (Eds.). (1999). Coordinated community response to domestic violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Schumacher, J., Fals-Stewart, W., & Leonard, K., (2003). Domestic violence treatment referrals for men seeking alcohol treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment , 24, 279-284.
26.
Selzer, M. (1971). The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST): The quest for a new diagnostic instrument. American Journal of Psychiatry, 3, 176-181.
27.
Skinner, H., & Horn, J. (1984). Alcohol Dependence Scale (ADS) user's guide. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation .
28.
Visher, C., Newmark, L., & Harrell, A. (2006). Final report on the evaluation of the Judicial Oversight Demonstration (Volume 2): Findings and lessons on implementation . Washington, DC: Urban Institute .
