Mock jurors (N = 312) viewed a simulated trial involving a woman, charged with the murder of her abusive husband, entering a plea of not guilty by reason of self-defense. Expert testimony was varied using battered woman syndrome, social agency framework, or no expert testimony. Within expert testimony conditions, jurors were presented with opening and closing statements either including or not including instructions aimed at inducing empathy. Results indicate differences in gender and expert testimony for ratings of guilt as well as differences in gender, expert testimony, and empathy induction for perceptions of the defendant.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author .
2.
Archer, N. (1989). Battered women and the legal system: Past, present and future. Law and Psychology Review, 13, 145-163.
3.
Archer, R.L., Foushee, H.C., & Davis, M.H. (1979). Emotional empathy in a courtroom simulation: A person-situation interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 9, 275-291.
4.
Batson, C.D., Turk, C.L., Shaw, L.L., & Klein, T.R. (1995). Information function of empathic emotion: Learning that we value others' welfare. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 300-313.
5.
Bornstein, B.H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75-91.
6.
Bowker, L. (1993). A battered woman's problems are social, not psychological . In R. Gelles & D. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 154-165). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Browne, A. (1987). When battered women kill. New York: Free Press.
8.
Davis, M. (1996). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.
9.
Deitz, S.R., Blackwell, K.T., Daley, P.C., & Bentley, B.J. (1982). Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 372-384.
10.
Dressler, J. (1995). Understanding criminal law (2nd ed.). New York: Matthew Bender /Irwin.
11.
Dutton, M.A. (1993). Understanding women's responses to domestic violence: A redefinition of battered woman syndrome. Hofstra Law Review , 21, 1191-1242.
12.
Faigman, D.L. (1986). The battered woman syndrome and self-defense: A legal and empirical dissent. Virginia Law Review, 72, 619-647.
13.
Faigman, D.L., & Wright, A.J. (1997). The battered woman syndrome in the age of science . Arizona Law Review, 39, 67-115.
14.
Finkel, N., Meister, K., & Lightfoot, D. (1991). The self-defense defense and community sentiment . Law and Human Behavior, 15, 585-602.
15.
Follingstad, D., Polek, D., Hause, E., Deaton, L., Bulger, M., & Conway, Z. (1989). Factors predicting verdicts in cases where battered women kill their husbands. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 253-269.
16.
Gillespie, C. (1989). Justifiable homicide. Columbus : Ohio State University Press.
17.
Gondolf, E.W., & Fisher, R.E. (1988). Battered women as survivors. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
18.
Haegerich, T.M., & Bottoms, B.L. (2000). Empathy and jurors' decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 421-448.
19.
Hirshel, J., Hutchison, I., & Dean, C. (1992). The failure of arrest to deter spouse abuse. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 7-33.
20.
Hoff, L.A. (1990). Battered women as survivors. London: Routledge.
21.
Jenkins, P., & Davidson, B. (1990). Battered women in the criminal justice system: An analysis of gender stereotypes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 8, 171-180.
22.
Jones, E.E., & Nisbett, R.E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
23.
Kasian, M.A., Spanos, N.P., Terrance, C.A., & Peebles, S. (1993). Battered women who kill: Jury simulation and legal defenses. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 289-312.
24.
Mahoney, M. (1991). Legal images of battered women: Redefining the issue of separation. Michigan Law Review, 90, 1-94.
25.
McCaul, K., Veltum, L., Boyechko, V., & Crawford, J. (1990). Understanding attributions of victim blame for rape: Sex, violence, and foreseeability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1-26.
26.
Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 525-543.
Raitt, F., & Zeedyk, M.S. (2000). The implicit relation of psychology and the law: Women and syndrome evidence. London: Routledge.
30.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 174-221). New York: Academic Press.
31.
Schneider, E.M. (2000). Battered women and feminist law-making. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
Schuller, R.A. (1992). The impact of battered woman syndrome evidence on jury decision processes. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 597-620.
33.
Schuller, R., & Hastings, P. (1996). Trials of battered women who kill: The impact of alternative forms of expert evidence. Law and Human Behavior , 20, 167-187.
34.
Schuller, R., & Rzepa, S. (2002). Expert testimony pertaining to battered woman syndrome: Its impact on jurors' decisions. Law and Human Behavior , 26, 655-673.
35.
Sheehy, E., Stubbs, J., & Tolmie, J. (1992). Defending battered women on trial: The battered woman syndrome and its limitations. Criminal Law Journal, 16, 369-395.
36.
Sherman, L., Smith, D., Schmidt, J., & Rogan, D. (1992). Crime, punishment and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 57, 680-690.
37.
Terrance, C. (2000). Jury simulation: The construction of victims in the courtroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
38.
Terrance, C., & Matheson, K. (2003). Undermining reasonableness: Expert testimony in a case involving a battered woman who kills. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 37-45.
39.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2000). Intimate partner violence. Retrieved December 8, 2002, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs
40.
Walker, L. (1979). The battered woman. New York : Harper & Row.
41.
Walker, L. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.
42.
Wispe, L. (1986). The distinction between sympathy and empathy: To call forth a concept, a word is needed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 314-321.
