This study analyzes data from a national, general population sample of respondents (National Violence Against Women Survey) to estimate the prevalence of the different forms of intimate partner violence (IPV) that women experience in the United States. The study's purpose, to differentiate types of IPV, follows the Johnson and Ferraro tradition that distinguishes occasional and random acts of abuse from chronic and controlling forms of violence. When examining the specific types of IPV that the survey respondents disclosed, the author finds that the distribution closely resembles Gordon's epidemiological findings. This study analyzed the variance in the number of types of IPV as a function of the childhood abuse the women experienced and their partner's controlling and threatening behaviors. It concludes with a discussion of the multiple responses to IPV that are necessary in contemporary U.S. society.
Anderson, K. L. (2003). Courting disaster: Intimate stalking, culture, and criminal justice. Gender &Society, 17, 646-647.
2.
Barata, P., & Senn, C. Y. (2003). When two fields collide: An examination of the assumptions of social science research and law within the domain of domestic violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4, 3-21.
3.
Bergen, R. K. (1996). Wife rape: Understanding the response of survivors and service providers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Bergen, R. K. (2001). Marital rape: A United States study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
5.
Brush, L. D. (1990). Violent acts and injurious outcomes in married couples: Methodological issues in the National Survey of Families and Households. Gender & Society, 4, 56-67.
6.
Bush, D. M. (1992). Women's movements and state policy reform aimed at domestic violence against women: A comparison of the consequences of movement mobilization in the United States and India. Gender & Society, 6, 587-608.
7.
Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C. R., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., et al. (2003). Assessing risk factors for intimate partner homicide. National Institute of Justice Journal, 250, 14-19.
8.
Davis, K. E., & Frieze, I. H. (2000). Research on stalking: What do we know? Where do we go?Violence and Victims, 15, 473-487.
9.
De Bellis, M. D., Broussard, E. R., Herring, D. J., Wexler, S., Moritz, G., & Benitez, J. G. (2001). Psychiatric co-morbidity in caregivers and children involved in maltreatment: A pilot research study with policy implications. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 923-944.
10.
Delsol, C., & Margolin, G. (2004). The role of family-of-origin violence in men's marital violence perpetration. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 99-122.
11.
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1992). Women, violence, and social change. London: Routledge.
12.
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (2000). The politics and policies of responding to violence against women. In J. Hanmer & C. Itzin (with S. Quaid & D. Wigglesworth; Eds.),Home truths about domestic violence: Feminist influence on policy and practice—A reader (pp. 187-204). London: Routledge.
13.
Dutton, D. G., & Kropp, P. R. (2000). A review of domestic violence risk instruments. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 1, 171-181.
14.
Ehrensaft, M. K., Cohen, P., Brown, J., Smailes, E., Chen, H. N., & Johnson, J. G. (2003). Intergenerational transmission of partner violence: A 20-year prospective study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 741-753.
15.
Fagan, J. A., Stewart, D. K.,& Hansen, K. V. (1983). Violent men or violent husbands? Background factors and situational correlates. In R. Gelles, D. Finkelhor, & G. T. Hotaling (Eds.), The dark side of families (pp. 49-68). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
Farmer, A., & Tiefenthaler, J. (1997). An economic analysis of domestic violence. Review of Social Economy, 55, 337-358.
17.
Finch, E. (2002). Stalking the perfect stalking law: An evaluation of the efficacy of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. Criminal Law Review, 703-718.
18.
Finkelhor, D., & Yllo, K. (1985). License to rape: Sexual abuse of wives. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
19.
Gagne, P. (1996). Identity, strategy, and feminist politics: Clemency for battered women who kill. Social Problems, 43, 77-93.
20.
Goebel, G., & Lapp, M. (2003). Stalking with fatal outcome: Five fatal and non-fatal assaults against women by their ex-partners. Kriminalistik, 57, 369-377.
21.
Goode, E. (2004). Courting disaster: Intimate stalking, culture, and criminal justice. Symbolic Interaction, 27, 119-122.
22.
Gordon, M. (2000). Definitional issues in violence against women: Surveillance and research from a violence research perspective. Violence Against Women, 6, 747-783.
23.
Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2003). Intimate terrorism and common couple violence: A test of Johnson's predictions in four British samples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 1247-1270.
24.
Gurdin, J. B. (2003). Stalking and violence: New patterns of trauma and obsession. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 608-609.
25.
Hasday, J. E. (2000). Contest and consent: A legal history of marital rape. California Law Review, 88, 1373-1505.
26.
Hillis, S. D., Anda, R. F., Dube, S. R., Felitti, V. J., Marchbanks, P. A., & Marks, J. S. (2004). The association between adverse childhood experiences and adolescent pregnancy, long-term psychosocial consequences, and fetal death. Pediatrics, 113, 320-327.
27.
Hirschel, D., & Hutchison, I. W. (2003). The voices of domestic violence victims: Predictors of victim preference for arrest and the relationship between preference for arrest and revictimization. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 313-336.
28.
Horowitz, E. B. (2003). Institutionalized feminism? The case of a domestic violence court. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
29.
Imbrogno, A. R., & Imbrogno, S. (2000). Mediation in court cases of domestic violence. Families in Society-the Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 81, 392-401.
30.
James, D. V., & Farnham, F. R. (2003). Stalking and serious violence. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31, 432-439.
31.
Jasinski, J. L.,& Dietz, T. L. (2003). Domestic violence and stalking among older adults: An assessment of risk markers. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 15, 3-18.
32.
Johnson, I. M., & Sigler, R. T. (1997). Forced sexual intercourse in intimate relationships. Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth/Ashgate.
33.
Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948-963.
34.
Jones, L., Hughes, M., & Unterstaller, U. (2001). Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in victims of domestic violence: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2, 99-119.
35.
Kaufman Kantor, G., & Little, L. (2003). Defining the boundaries of child neglect: When does domestic violence equate with parental failure to protect?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 338-355.
36.
Kaukinen, C. (2004). Status compatibility, physical violence, and emotional abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 452-471.
37.
Keilitz, S. L., Hannaford, P. L., & Efkerman, H. S. (1996). Civil protection orders: The benefits and limitations for victims of domestic violence. State Court Journal, 20, 17-17.
38.
Kilpatrick, D. G., Best, C. C., Saunders, B. E., & Vernon, L. J. (1988). Rape in marriage and dating relationships: How bad is it for mental health?Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 528, 335-344.
39.
Kilpatrick, D. G., Edmunds, C. M., & Seymour, A. K. (1992). Rape in America: A report to the nation. Arlington, VA: National Victim Center.
40.
Kurz, D. (1989). Social science perspectives on wife abuse: Current debates and future directions. Gender & Society, 3, 489-505.
41.
Kurz, D. (1996). Separation, divorce, and woman abuse. Violence Against Women, 2, 63-81.
42.
Leone, J. M., Johnson, M. P., Cohan, C., & Lloyd, S. E. (2004). Consequences of male partner violence for low-income minority women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 472-490.
43.
Logan, T. K., Walker, R., Horvath, L. S., & Leukefeld, C. (2003). Divorce, custody, and spousal violence: A random sample of circuit court docket records. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 269-279.
44.
Macmillan, R., & Gartner, R. (1999). When she brings home the bacon: Labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 947-958.
45.
Mahoney, P., & Williams, L. M. (1998). Sexual assault in marriage: Prevalence, consequences, and treatment of wife rape. In J. J. Jasinski & L. M. Williams (Eds.),Partner violence: A comprehensive review of 20 years of research (pp. 113-162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Margolin, G. E., Gordis, B., Medina, A. M., & Oliver, P. H. (2003). The co-occurrence of husband-to-wife aggression, family-of-origin aggression, and child abuse potential in a community sample: Implications for parenting. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 413-440.
47.
McCloskey, L. A. (1996). Socioeconomic and coercive power within the family. Gender & Society,10, 449-463.
48.
McFarlane, J., Malecha, A., Gist, J., Watson, K., Batten, E., Hall, I., & Smith, S. (2004). Protection orders and intimate partner violence: An 18-month study of 150 Black, Hispanic, and White women. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 613-618.
49.
Miller, J. (2003). An arresting experiment: Domestic violence victim experiences and perceptions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 695-716.
50.
Mills, L. G. (2003). Insult to injury: Rethinking our responses to intimate abuse. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
Mullen, P. E. (2003). Stalking crimes and victim protection: Prevention, intervention, threat assessment, and case management. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 14, 452-454.
52.
National Institute of Justice. (2004). Research in brief—Violence against women: Identifying risk factors. Washington, DC: Author.
53.
O'Connor, M., & Rosenfeld, B. (2004). Introduction to the special issue on stalking: Finding and filling the empirical gaps. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 3-8.
54.
Pleck, E. (1987). Domestic tyranny: The making of family policy against family violence from Colonial times to present. New York: Oxford University Press.
55.
Purcell, R., Pathe, M., & Mullen, P. E. (2004). Stalking: Defining and prosecuting a new category of offending. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27, 157-169.
56.
Rosenfeld, B. (2004). Violence risk factors in stalking and obsessional harassment: A review and preliminary meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 9-36.
57.
Rothenberg, B. (2003). “We don't have time for social change”: Cultural compromise and the battered woman syndrome. Gender & Society, 17, 771-787.
58.
Russell, D. E. H. (1990). Rape in marriage. New York: Macmillan.
59.
Saltzman, L. E., McMahon, P. M., & Shelley, G. A. (1999). Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements (Version 1.0). Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
60.
Schneider, E. M. (2000). Battered women and feminist lawmaking. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
61.
Seva, A. (2003). Surviving stalking. European Journal of Psychiatry, 17, 251-251.
62.
Siegel, J. A., & Williams, L. A. (2001). Risk factors for violent victimization of women: A prospective study. Retrieved May 15, 2001, from http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1.nij/grants/189161.pdf
63.
Smith, M. D. (1987). The incidence and prevalence of woman abuse in Toronto. Violence and Victims, 2, 173-187.
64.
Smith, M. D. (1994). Enhancing the quality of survey data on violence against women: A feminist approach. Gender & Society, 8, 109-127.
65.
Smith, M. D., & Morra, N. N. (1994). Obscene and threatening telephone calls to women: Data from a Canadian national survey. Gender & Society, 8, 584-596.
66.
Spitz, M. A. L. (2003). Stalking: Terrorism at our doors—How social workers can help victims fight back. Social Work, 48, 504-512.
67.
Straus, M. A. (1992). The National Family Violence Surveys. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (with C. Smith; Eds.),Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 3-16). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
68.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1999). Violence and threats of violence against women and men in the United States, 1994-1996 (ICPSR version). Denver: Center for Policy Research (Producer). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (Distributor).
69.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
70.
Tjaden, P., Thoennes, N., & Allison, C. J. (2000). Comparing stalking victimization from legal and victim perspectives. Violence and Victims, 15, 7-22.
71.
Tsai, B. (2000). Note: The trend toward specialized domestic violence courts: Improvements on an effective innovation. Fordham Law Review, 68, 1285-1327.
72.
Walker, R. T., Logan, K., Jordan, C. E., & Campbell, J. C. (2004). An integrative review of separation in the context of victimization: Consequences and implications for women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5, 143-193.
73.
West, C. M. (1998). Lifting the “political gag order”: Breaking the silence around partner violence in ethnic minority families. In J. L. Jasinski & L. M. Williams (Eds.), Partner violence: A comprehensive review of 20 years of research (pp. 184-209). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
White, H. R., & Widom, C. S. (2003). Intimate partner violence among abused and neglected children in young adulthood: The mediating effects of early aggression, antisocial personality, hostility and alcohol problems. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 332-345.
75.
White, J. C., & Smith, P. H. (2001). Developmental antecedents of violence against women. Retrieved May 2001 from http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/nij/grants/187775.pdf
76.
Widom, C. S. (1989). Does violence beget violence? A critical examination of the literature. PsychologicalBulletin, 106, 3-28.
