The mandated arrest of domestic violence perpetrators is a policy response to the problem of partner violence. Mandatory arrest can result, however, in unintended and sometimes undesirable arrest outcomes, including dual arrests (when both parties are arrested), retaliatory arrests (when the perpetrator has his or her partner wrongfully arrested), and failures to make an arrest (when one is warranted by law). Using an inter-actionist perspective, this research focuses on one negative effect of mandatory arrest: the identity challenge faced by female victims of domestic violence who experience undesirable arrest outcomes. The authors discuss policy implications, focusing on the potential empowerment effects of mandatory arrest.
Arksey, H., & Knight, P. (1999). Interviewing for social scientists: An introductory resource with examples. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Belknap, J. (1995). Law enforcement officers’ attitudes about the appropriate response to woman battering. International Review of Victimology, 4, 47-62.
3.
Best, J. (1997, May/June). Victimization and the victim industry. Society, 34, 9-18.
4.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspectives and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
Buel, S. (1988). Mandatory arrest for domestic violence. Harvard Women’s Law Journal, 11, 213-226.
6.
Buzawa, E., Austin, T., Bannon, J., & Jackson, J. (1992). Role of victim preference in determining police response to victims of domestic violence. In E. Buzawa & C. Buzawa (Eds.), Domestic violence: The changing criminal justice system (pp. 255-269). Westport, CT: Auburn House.
7.
Buzawa, E., & Buzawa, C. (1993). The scientific evidence is not conclusive: Arrest is no panacea. In R. Gelles & D. Loeske (Eds.), Current controversies in family violence (pp. 337-356). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Chafetz, J. (1990). Gender equity: A theory of stability and change. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Charmaz, K. (1987). Struggling for a self: Identity levels in the chronically ill. In J. Roth & P. Conrad (Eds.), Research in the sociology of healthcare: The experience and management of chronic illness (pp. 283-320). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
10.
Cicourel, A. V. (1974). Cognitive sociology: Language and meaning in social interaction. New York: Free Press.
11.
Dasgupta, S. D. (2002). A framework for understanding women’s use of non-lethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 1364-1389.
12.
Ferraro, K. J. (1989). Policing woman battering. Social Problems, 36, 61-74.
13.
Ferraro, K., & Johnson, J. M. (1983). How women experience battering: The process of victimization. Social Problems, 30, 325-339.
14.
Ferraro, K., & Pope, L. (1993). Irreconcilable differences: Battered women, police, and the law. In N. Z. Hilton (Ed.), Local responses to wife assault: Current trends and evaluations (pp. 96-123). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Ford, D. (1991a). Preventing and provoking wife battery through criminal sanctioning: A look at the risks. In D. Knudsen & J. Miller (Eds.), Abused and battered: Social and legal responses to family violence (pp. 191-209). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
16.
Ford, D. (1991b). Prosecution as a victim power resource. Law and Society Review, 25, 313-324.
17.
Frye, V., Haviland, M., & Rajah, V. (in press). Dual arrest and other unintended consequences of mandatory arrest in New York City: A brief report. Journal of Family Violence.
18.
Gergen, K. (1989). Warranting voice and elaboration of the self. In J. Shotter & K. Gergen (Eds.), Texts of identity (pp. 70-81). London: Sage.
19.
Goffman, E. (1951). Symbols of social status. British Journal of Sociology, 2, 294-304.
20.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York. Anchor.
21.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
Goldberg, C. (1999, November 23). Spouse abuse crackdown, surprisingly, nets many women. New York Times, p. A16-A16.
23.
Haviland, M., Frye, V., Rajah, V., Thukral, J., & Trinity, M. (2001). The Family Protection and Domestic Violence Act of 1995: Examining the effects of mandatory arrest in New York City. New York: Urban Justice Center.
24.
Hirschel, D., & Buzawa, E. (2002). Understanding the context of dual arrest with directions for future research. Violence Against Women, 6, 1449-1473.
25.
Hollander, J. (2002). Resisting vulnerability: The social construction of gender in interaction. Social Problems, 49, 474-496.
26.
Holstein, J. A., & Miller, G. (1997). Rethinking victimization: An interactional approach to victimology. In G. Miller & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Social problems in everyday life (pp. 25-47). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
27.
Hughes, G., & Degher, D. (1993). Coping with a deviant identity. Deviant Behavior, 14, 297-315.
28.
Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 101 S. Ct. 2317, 76 L Ed. 2d 527 (1983).
29.
Jones, D., & Belknap, J. (1999). Police responses to battering in a progressive pro-arrest jurisdiction. Justice Quarterly, 16, 249-273.
30.
Kingsnorth, R., & MacIntosh, R. (2004). Domestic violence: Predictors of victim support for official action. Justice Quarterly, 21, 301-328.
31.
Lempert, L. B. (1996). Women’s strategies for survival: Developing agency in abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 269-289.
32.
Loeske, D. R. (2000). Ethos, pathos and social change: Reflections on formula narratives. Perspectives on Social Problems, 12, 45-77.
33.
Martin, P. M. (1997). Double your trouble: Dual arrest in family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 139-157.
34.
Maxwell, C. D., Garner, J. H., & Fagan, J. A. (2001). The effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: New evidence from the Spouse Assault Replication Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
35.
Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
McMahon, M., & Pence, E. (2003). Making social change: Reflections on individual and institutional advocacy with women arrested for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 9, 47-74.
37.
Miller, S. (2000). Mandatory arrest and domestic violence: Continuing questions. In R. Muraskin & T. Alleman (Eds.), It’s a crime: Women and justice (pp. 283-310). New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
Miller, S. (2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence: Criminal justice professionals and service providers respond. Violence Against Women, 7, 1339-1376.
39.
Mills, L. (1998). Mandatory arrest and prosecution policies for domestic violence: A critical literature review and the case for more research to test victim empowerment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 306-318.
40.
Newman, G. (1985). The punishment response (2nd ed.). New York: Harrow and Heston.
41.
NY Crim. Proc. Law § 140.10 (4)(c) (McKinney Supp., 2001).
42.
Osthoff, S. (2002). “But Gertrude, I beg to differ, a hit is not a hit”: When battered women are arrested for assaulting their partners. Violence Against Women, 8, 1521-1544.
43.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44.
Rasche, C. E. (1995). Minority women and violence: The unique dilemmas of battered women of color. In B. Price & N. Sokoloff (Eds.), The criminal justice system and women: Offenders, prisoners, & workers (pp. 323-334). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
45.
Reisig, M. D., McCluskey, J. D., Mastrofski, S. D., & Terrill, W. (2004). Citizen disrespect toward the police. Justice Quarterly, 21, 241-268.
46.
Riessman, C. K. (2002, May). Illness narratives: Positioned identities. Invited annual lecture, Health Communication Research Center, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
47.
Schwalbe, M. (1993). Goffman against postmodernism: Emotion and the reality of the self. Symbolic Interaction, 16, 333-350.
48.
Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46-62.
49.
Sherman, L., & Berk, R. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic violence assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.
50.
Skeggs, B. (2001). The toilet paper: Femininity, class and misrecognition. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24, 295-307.
51.
Smith, A. (2000). “It’s my decision, isn’t it?”: A research note on battered women’s perceptions of mandatory intervention laws. Violence Against Women, 6, 1384-1402.
52.
Stephens, J. B., & Sinden, P. (2000). Victims voices: Domestic assault victims’ perceptions of police demeanor. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 534-547.
53.
Thurman v. City of Torrington, 595 F. Supp. 1521; Thurman V. City of Torrington, USDC. No. J-84-120 (June 25, 1985).
54.
Weis, L. (2001). Race, gender and critique: African American women, white women, and domestic violence in the 1980s and 1990s. Signs, 27, 139-169.
55.
Williams, K. (2002, January). Legal sanctions and the violent victimization of women. Paper presented at Expanding the Federal Research Agenda on Violence Against Women Workshop, Committee on Law and Justice and the National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
56.
Zorza, J. (1992). Symposium on domestic violence: Criminal law: The criminal law of misdemeanor domestic violence, 1970-1990. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83, 46-72.
