Mandatory and preferred arrest policies may be resulting in a backlash for victims who are arrested along with their batterers. Little prior research has explored why officers engage in dual arrests. The current study examines the rationales employed by officers to justify dual arrests in a preferred arrest jurisdiction. Content analysis of thought protocols of police officers (n=24) who reported they would arrest both parties was undertaken. Officers justified arrest of both parties, citing that suchwas required by lawand the desire to force both parties to obtain counseling for their relationship. Implications for policy development are examined.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680.
2.
Barnett, O. W., Lee, C. Y.,& Thelen, R. E. (1997). Gender differences in attributions of self-defense and control in interpartner aggression. Violence Against Women, 3, 462-481.
3.
Belknap, J. (1995). Lawenforcement officers’attitudes about the appropriate responses towoman battering. International Review of Victimology, 4, 47-62.
4.
Berk, S. F., & Loseke, D. R. (1980-1981). Handling family violence: Situational determinants of police arrest in domestic disturbances. Law and Society Review, 15, 317-345.
5.
Bohmer, C., Brandt, J., Bronson, D.,& Hartnett, H. (2002). Domestic violence lawreforms: Reactions from the trenches. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 24, 71-87.
6.
Bruno v. Codd, 90 Misc. 2d 1047, 396 N.Y.S.2d 974 (1977).
7.
Brush, L. D. (1990). Violent acts and injurious outcomes in married couples: Methodological issues in the National Survey of Families and Households. Gender & Society, 4, 56-67.
8.
Buzawa, E., Austin, T. L.,& Buzawa, C. G. (1995). Responding to crimes of violence against women: Gender differences versus organizational imperatives. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 443-466.
9.
California Alliance Against DomesticViolence. (2004). Legislative successes for battered women and their children. Retrieved June 4, 2004, from http://www.caadv.org/docs/successes.pdf
10.
Chesney-Lind, M. (2002). Criminalizing victimization: The unintended consequences of pro-arrest policies for girls and women. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 81-89.
11.
Cook, P. W. (1997). Abused men: The hidden side of domestic violence. New York: Praeger.
12.
Dasgupta, S. D. (1999). Just like men? Acritical viewof violence bywomen. In M. F. Shepard& E. L. Pence (Eds.), Coordinating community response to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond (pp. 195-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Dasgupta, S. D. (2002). A framework for understandingwomen’s use of nonlethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 1364-1389.
14.
Davis, R. (2001). Dual arrest and primary aggressor policies. Women Police, 35(1), 33-33.
15.
Domestic Violence Training and Monitoring Unit. (2003). DV cases arrests, dual arrest, and multiple involvement: Domestic violence and sexual assault reports from 1/1/01-12/31/02(DV No. 02). Retrieved August 6, 2003, from http://courts.state.ri.us/domesticnew/dvsa/reports_dloads.htm
16.
Edwards, A. R. (1989). Sex/gender, sexism, and criminal justice: Some theoretical considerations. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 17, 165-184.
17.
Eigenberg, H. M., Scarborough, K. E., & Kappeler, V. E. (1996). Contributory factors affecting arrest in domestic and non-domestic assaults. American Journal of Police, 15, 27-54.
18.
Family Violence Act, Official Code of Georgia Annotated § 17-4-20.1 (1991).
19.
Ferraro, K. J. (1989). Policing woman battering. Social Problems, 36, 61-74.
20.
Finn, M. A., Blackwell, B. S., Stalans, L. J., Studdard, S., & Dugan, L. (2004). Dual arrest decisions in domestic violence cases: The influence of departmental policies. Crime & Delinquency, 50, 565-589.
21.
Finn, M. A.,& Stalans, L. J. (1997). The influence of gender and mental state on police decisions in domestic assault cases. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 24, 157-176.
22.
Georgia Bureau of Investigation. (2003). Family violence data: Summary report. Retrieved July 22, 2003, from http://www.ganet.org/gbi/2001ucrsum.html%23fvi
23.
Georgia Commission on Family Violence. (2003). Family violence guidelines for Georgia law enforcement. Retrieved July 22, 2003, from http://169.2.90.195/GCFV/uploads/protocol.law.pdf
24.
Georgia Commission on Family Violence. (2004). FVIP referral findings. Atlanta, GA: Author.
25.
Goldberg, C. (1999, November 23). Spouse abuse crackdown, surprisingly nets manywomen. The NewYork Times, p. A16-A16.
26.
Hamberger, L. K. (1997). Female offenders in domestic violence: Alook at actions in their contexts. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 1, 119-129.
27.
Hamberger, L. K., & Potente, T. (1994). Counseling heterosexual women arrested for domestic violence: Implications for theory and practice. Violence and Victims, 9, 125-137.
28.
Haviland, M., Frye, V., Rajah, V., Thukral, J., & Trinity, M. (2001). The Family Protection and Domestic Violence Intervention Act of 1995: Examining the effects of mandatory arrest in New York City. New York: Urban Justice Center.
29.
Herbert, S. (1998). Police subculture reconsidered. Criminology, 36, 343-369.
30.
Henning, K., & Feder, L. (2004). A comparison of men and women arrested for domestic violence: Who presents the greater threat?Journal of Family Violence, 19, 69-80.
31.
Hirschel, D., & Buzawa, E. (2002). Understanding the context of dual arrest with directions for future research. Violence Against Women, 8, 1449-1473.
32.
Hoctor, M. M. (1997). Domestic violence as a crime against the state: The need for mandatory arrest in California. California Law Review, 85, 643-700.
33.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A.,& Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 476-497.
34.
Hoyle, C., & Sanders, A. (2000). Police response to domestic violence: From victim choice to victim empowerment. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 14-36.
35.
Humphries, D. (2002). No easy answers: Public policy, criminal justice, and domestic violence. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 91-96.
36.
Johnson, M. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283-294.
37.
Jones, D. A.,& Belknap, J. (1999). Police responses to battering in a progressive pro-arrest jurisdiction. Justice Quarterly, 16, 249-273.
38.
Kane, R. J. (2000). Police responses to restraining orders in domestic violence incidents: Identifying the custody-threshold thesis. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 27, 561-580.
39.
Kimmel, M. S. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8, 1332-1363.
40.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
41.
Lane, E., Lucera, J., & Boba, R. (2003). Inter-agency responses to domestic violence in a medium size city. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
42.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Neidig, P.,& Thorn, G. (1995). Violent marriages: Gender differences in levels of current violence and past abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 159-176.
43.
Martin, M. E. (1997). Double your trouble: Dual arrest in family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 139-157.
44.
Martin, M. E. (1999). From criminal justice to transformative justice: The challenges of social control for battered women. Contemporary Justice Review, 2, 415-436.
45.
McMahon, M.,& Pence, E. (2003). Making social change: Reflections on individual and institutional advocacy with women arrested for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 9, 47-74.
46.
Miller, N. (2000). A review of state domestic violence-related legislation: A law enforcement and prosecution perspective. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Law and Justice.
47.
Miller, S. L. (2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence: Criminal justice professionals and service providers respond. Violence Against Women, 7, 1339-1376.
48.
Mills, L. G. (1998). Mandatory arrest and prosecution policies for domestic violence: A critical literature review and the case for more research to test victim empowerment approaches. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 25, 306-318.
49.
Moffit, T. E., & Caspi, A. (1999). Findings about partner violence from the Dunedin multidisciplinary health and development study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
50.
New York State Office for the Prevention of Domestic Violence. (1999). The primary aggressor law. PODV Bulletin. Albany, NY: Author. Retrieved on June 17, 2004, from http://www.opdv.state.ny.us/public_awareness/bulletins/spring1999/aggressor.html
51.
Oberweis, T., & Musheno, M. (1999). Policing identities: Cop decision making and the constitution of citizens. Law and Social Inquiry, 24, 897-923.
52.
Osthoff, S. (2002). But Gertrude, I beg to differ, a hit is not a hit is not a hit: When battered women are arrested for assaulting their partners. Violence Against Women, 8, 1521-1544.
53.
Pearson, P. (1997). When she was bad: Violent women and the myth of innocence. New York: Viking.
54.
Pleck, E., Pleck, J., Grossman, M., & Bart, P. (1978). The battered data syndrome: A comment on Steinmetz’s article. Victimology, 2, 680-684.
55.
Renzetti, C. M. (1999). The challenge to feminism posed by women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept(pp. 42-56). New York: New York University Press.
56.
Rigakos, G. S. (1995). Constructing the symbolic complainant: Police subculture and the nonenforcement of protection orders for battered women. Violence and Victims, 10, 227-247.
57.
Saunders, D. G. (1986). When battered women use violence: Husband-abuse or self-defense?Violence and Victims, 1, 47-58.
58.
Saunders, D. G. (1995). The tendency to arrest victims of domestic violence: A preliminary analysis of officer characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 147-158.
59.
Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (1993). The return of the “battered husband syndrome” through the typification of women as violent. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 20, 249-265.
60.
Sen, R. (1999). Between a rock and a hard place: Domestic violence in communities of color. Colorlines, 2(1). Retrieved on June 17, 2004, from http://www.arc.org/C_Lines/CLArchive/story2_1_07.html
61.
Sherman, L. W.,& Berk, R. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.
62.
Stalans, L. J.,& Finn, M. A., (1995). Hownovice and experienced officers interpret wife assault: Normative and efficiency frames. Law and Society Review, 29, 301-335.
63.
Stark, E. (1993). Mandatory arrest of batterers: A response to its critics. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 651-680.
64.
State of Connecticut Department of Public Safety. (1991). Study of family violence incidents which result in arrest of both parties. Meriden, CT: Connecticut State Police.
65.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 71-88.
66.
Straus, M. A. (1990). The Conflict Tactics Scale and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families(pp. 49-73). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
67.
Straus, M. A. (1993). Physical assaults by wives: A major social problem. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence(pp. 67-87). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
68.
Straus, M. A. (1997). Physical assaults by women partners: A major social problem. In M. R. Walsh (Ed.), Women, men, and gender: Ongoing debates(pp. 210-221). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
69.
Straus, M. A. (1999). The controversy over domestic violence by women: A methodological, theoretical, and sociology of science analysis. In X. B. Arriaga & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Violence in intimate relationships(pp. 17-44). Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage.
70.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal ofFamily Issues, 17, 284-316.
71.
Swan, S. C., & Snow, D. L. (2002). A typology of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 286-319.
72.
Swan, S. C.,& Snow, D. L. (2003). Behavioral and psychological differences among abusedwomen who use violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 9, 75-109.
73.
Tjaden, P.,& Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence AgainstWomen Survey(NCJ No. 181867). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
74.
Thurman v. City of Torrington, 595 F. Supp. 1521 (1984).
75.
Waaland, P.,& Keeley, S. (1985). Police decision making in wife abuse: The impact of legal and extra-legal factors. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 355-366.
76.
White, J. W., & Humphrey, J. A. (1994). Female aggression in heterosexual relationships. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 195-202.
77.
Worcester, N. (2002). Women’s use of force: Complexities and challenges of taking the issue seriously. Violence Against Women, 8, 1390-1415.
78.
Worden, R. E.,& Pollitz, A. A. (1984). Police arrest in domestic disturbances: Afurther look. Law and Society Review, 18, 105-119.
79.
Wright, E. A. (2000). Not a black and white issue: For battered and abused Latina and Blackwomen, dialing 911 may be risky business. In N. Worcester & M. H. Whatley (Eds.), Women’s health: Readings on social, economic, and political issues(pp. 549-552). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
80.
Young, C. (1995, October 31). Domestic violence isn’t a one-way street. Philadelphia Inquirer, p. A13-A13.
81.
Zorza, J.,& Woods, L. (1994). Mandatory arrest: Problems and possibilities. New York: National Battered Women’s Law Project.
