Crawford, M., & Kimmel, E. (1999). Promoting methodological diversity in feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 1-6.
2.
Harding, S. (1987). Feminism and methodology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
3.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
4.
Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (1994). Gender and the meaning of difference: Postmodernism and psychology. In A. Hermann & A. Stewart (Eds.), Theorizing feminism (pp. 49-76). Boulder, CO: Westview.
5.
Jayaratne, T. E., & Stewart, A. J. (1991). Quantitative and qualitative methods in the social science. In M. M. Fonow & J. A. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 85-106). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
6.
Nielsen, J. M. (1990). Feminist research methods: Exemplary readings in the social sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview.
7.
Peplau, L. A., & Conrad, E. (1989). Beyond nonsexist research: The perils of feminist methods in psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 379-400.
8.
Riger, S. (1992). Epistemological debates, feminist voices: Science, social values, and the study of women. American Psychologist, 47, 730-740.
9.
Stewart, A. J. (1994). Toward a feminist strategy for studying women’s lives. In C. E. Franz & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Women creating lives: Identities, resilience, and resistance (pp. 11-35). Boulder, CO: Westview.
10.
Williams, L. M. (2004). Researcher-advocate collaborations to end violence against women: Toward liberating methodologies for action research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1350-1357.