Browne, A. (1987). Battered women who kill. New York: Free Press.
2.
Browne, A., Williams, K. R., & Dutton, D. C. (1998). Homicide between intimate partners. In D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 149-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Campbell, J. C. (1981). Misogyny and homicide of women. Advances in Nursing Science, 3, 67-85.
4.
Campbell, J. C. (1986). Nursing assessment of risk of homicide for battered women. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 36-51.
5.
Campbell, J. C. (1995). Assessing dangerousness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Campbell, J. C. (2005). Danger Assessment psychometric information. Retrieved on May 1, 2005, from www.dangerassessment.com
7.
Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C. R., Campbell, D., Curry, M., et al. (2003). Assessing risk factors for intimate partner homicide. National Institute of Justice Journal, 250, 14-19.
8.
Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., O’Sullivan, C., & Roehl, J. (2005). Final report: Intimate partner violence risk assessment validation (RAVE) study. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
9.
de Becker, G. (1997). The gift of fear. Boston: Little, Brown.
10.
Dugan, L., Nagin, D. S., & Rosenfeld, R. (1999). Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: The effects of changing domesticity, women's status, and domestic violence resources. Homicide Studies, 3, 187-214.
11.
Dugan, L., Nagin, D. S., & Rosenfeld, R. (2003). Do domestic violence services save lives?National Institute of Justice Journal, 250, 20-25.
12.
Gavin de Becker & Associates. (2000). Domestic violence method (DV-Mosaic). Retrieved on November 1, 2000, from http://www.mosaicsystem.com/dv.htm
13.
Goodman, L., Dutton, M. A., & Bennett, L. (2000). Predicting repeat abuse among arrested batterers: Use of the Danger Assessment Scale in the criminal justice system. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 63-74.
14.
Hanson, R., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated metaanalysis. (User Report 2004-02). Ottawa, Canada: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
15.
Hart, B. (1988). Beyond the “duty to warn”: Atherapist's “duty to protect” batteredwomen and children. In K. Yllo & M. Bogard (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 234-248). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Heckert, D. A., & Gondolf, E. W. (2004). Battered women's perceptions of risk versus risk factors and instruments in predicting repeat reassault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 778-800.
17.
Hilton, A., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Lang, C., Cormier, C., & Lines, K. (2004). Validation of the O.D.A.R.A. domestic violence risk assessment instrument. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 16, 300-312.
18.
Klein, E., Campbell, J., Soler, E.,& Ghez, M. (1997). Ending domestic violence: Changing public perceptions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Kropp, P. R. (2004). Some questions regarding spousal assault risk assessment. Violence Against Women, 10, 676-697.
20.
Langford, L., Isaac, N. E.,& Kabat, S. (1998). Homicides related to intimate partner violence in Massachusetts. Homicide Studies, 2, 353-377.
21.
Maryland Network Against Domestic Violence (2005). Events. Retrieved on May 1, 2005, from www.MNADV.com
22.
Pinard, G. F.,& Pagani, P. (Eds.) (2001). Clinical assessment of dangerousness: Empirical contributions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Quinsey, V., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24.
Sharps, P. W., Campbell, J. C., Campbell, D. W., Gary, F. A.,&Webster, D. (2001). The role of alcohol use in intimate partner femicide. American Journal on Addictions, 10, 122-135.
25.
Websdale, N. (1999). Understanding domestic homicide. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
26.
Weisz, A., Tolman, R., & Saunders, D. G. (2000). Assessing the risk of severe domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 75-90.
27.
Williams, K. R., & Houghton, A. B. (2004). Assessing the risk of domestic violence reoffending: A validation study. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 437-455.