Two studies investigated college students’ perceptions of causes of violence in heterosexual dating relationships. Study 1 examined 107 participants’ written causal explanations for dating violence. The second study focused on 70 students’ ratings of cause in 15 scenarios ending with the man hitting the woman. Relationship and communication problems were primary causes when dating violence was presented in a concrete situation, whereas power and gender socialization were primary causes when presented as a social problem. Participants acknowledge power as an important cause, which suggests feminist structural frameworks in which relationship violence is embedded may lead to more effective prevention education.
Abbey, A. (1991). Acquaintance rape and alcohol consumption on a college campus: How are they linked?American Journal of College Health, 39, 165-170.
2.
Abbey, A., Ross, L. T., McDuffie, D., & McAuslan, P. (1996). Alcohol and dating risk factors for sexual assault among college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 147-169.
3.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.
4.
Avery-Leaf, S., & Cascardi, M. (2002). Dating violence education: Prevention and early intervention strategies. In P. A. Schewe (Ed.), Preventing violence in dating relationships: Interventions across the life span (pp. 79-105). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5.
Berkowitz, A. D. (2002). Fostering men’s responsibility for preventing sexual assault. In P. A. Schewe (Ed.), Preventing violence in dating relationships: Interventions across the life span (pp. 163-196). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. Toronto, Canada: Bantam Books.
7.
Burke, P. J., Stets, J. E., & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1989). Gender identity, self-esteem, and physical and sexual abuse in dating relationships. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 72-93). New York: Praeger.
8.
Corcoran, C. B. (1992). From victim control to social change: A feminist perspective on campus rape and prevention programs. In J. Chrisler & D. Howard (Eds.), New directions in feminist psychology (pp. 130-140). New York: Springer.
9.
Cowan, G. (2000). Beliefs about the causes of four types of rape. Sex Roles, 42, 807-823.
10.
Cowan, G., & Quinton, W. J. (1997). Cognitive style and attitudinal correlates of the Perceived Causes of Rape Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 227-245.
11.
Creighton, A., & Kivel, P. (1998). Young men’s work: Stopping violence and building community. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
12.
DeKeresedy, W. S. (1990). Woman abuse in dating relationships: The contribution of male peer support. Sociological Inquiry, 60, 263-243.
13.
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives: Acase against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.
14.
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1998). Rethinking violence against women. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Fenstermaker, S. (1989). Acquaintance rape on campus: Responsibility and attributions of crime. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 257-271). New York: Praeger.
16.
Fonow, M. M., Richardson, L., & Wemmerus, V. A. (1992). Feminist rape education: Does it work?Gender & Society, 6, 108-121.
17.
Foster, M. (2001). The motivational quality of global attributions in hypothetical situations and experienced situations of gender discrimination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 242-253.
18.
Foubert, J. D. (1998). The men’s program: How to successfully lower men’s likelihood of raping. Holmes Beach, FL: Learning Press.
19.
Funk, R. E. (1993). Stopping rape: A challenge for men. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.
20.
Gamache, D. (1991). Domination and control: The social context of dating violence. In B. Levy (Ed.), Dating violence: Young women in danger (pp. 69-83). Seattle, WA: Seal Press.
21.
Gelles, R. J. (1993). Through a sociological lens: Social structure and family violence. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies in family violence (pp. 31-46). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
23.
Harrison, P. J., Downes, J., & Williams, M. D. (1991). Date and acquaintance rape: Perceptions and attitude change strategies. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 131-139.
24.
Henley, N. M., & Kramarae, C. (1991). Gender, power, and communication. In N. Coupland, H. Giles, & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), “Miscommunication” and problematic talk (pp. 18-43). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Kaufman, G. (1997, November). Men stopping rape: A community response. Address presented at the Fourth Annual Southern Regional Association for Women in Psychology Conference, Wilmington, NC.
26.
Kivel, P. (1992). Men’s work: How to stop the violence that tears our lives apart. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
27.
Lane, K. E., & Gwartney-Gibbs, P. A. (1985). Violence in the context of dating and sex. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 45-49.
28.
Lloyd, S. A., Koval, J. E., & Cate, R. M. (1989). Conflict and violence in dating relationships. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 126-142). New York: Praeger.
29.
Lonsway, K., & Klaw, E. (1998). Beyond “no means no”: Outcomes of an intensive program to train peer facilitators for campus acquaintance rape education. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 73-92.
30.
Mahlstedt, D., & Corcoran, C. B. (1999). Preventing dating violence. In M. Crawford, S. Davis, & J. Sebrechts (Eds.), Coming into her own (pp. 311-327). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
Mahlstedt, D., Falcone, D. J., & Rice-Spring, L. (1993). Dating violence education: What do students learn?Journal of Human Justice, 4, 100-117.
32.
Makepeace, J. M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Family Relations, 30, 97-102.
33.
Makepeace, J. M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship violence. Family Relations, 35, 383-388.
34.
Malamuth, N. M. (1998). The confluence model as an organizing framework for research on sexually aggressive men: Risk moderators, imagined aggression, and pornography consumption. In R. G. Geen & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research and implications for social policy (pp. 229-245). New York: Academic Press.
35.
Meyer, H. (2002). College sexual assault programs that have been evaluated: A review. Retrieved May 16, 2002, from www.vawprevention.org/research/college_sa_eval.pdf.
36.
Murnen, S. K., Wright, C., & Kaluzny, G. (2002). If “boys will be boys,” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46, 359-375.
37.
O’Leary, K. D. (1999). Developmental and affective issues in assessing and treating partner aggression. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 400-414.
38.
Riggs, D. S., & O’Leary, K. D. (1996). Aggression between heterosexual dating partners. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 519-540.
39.
Sanday, P. R. (1990). Fraternity gang rape: Sex, brotherhood, and privilege on campus. New York: New York University Press.
40.
Schissel, B. (2000). Boys against girls: The structural and interpersonal dimensions of violent patriarchal culture in the lives of young men. Violence Against Women, 6, 960-986.
41.
Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeresedy, W. S. (1997). Sexual assault on the college campus: The role of male peer support. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
Sugarman, D. B., & Hotaling, G. T. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and risk markers. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 3-32). New York: Praeger.
43.
Ullman, S. E., Karabatsos, G., & Koss, M. P. (1999). Alcohol and sexual aggression in a national sample of college men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 673-689.
44.
White, J. W., & Koss, M. P. (1991). Courtship violence: Incidence in a national sample of higher education. Violence and Victims, 6, 247-256.
45.
White, J. W., & Kowalski, R. M. (1998). Male violence toward women: An integrated perspective. In R. G. Geen & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research and implications for social policy (pp. 202-228). New York: Academic Press.
46.
White, J. W., Merrill, L. L., & Koss, M. P. (2001). Predictors of premilitary courtship violence in a Navy recruit sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 910-927.
47.
Yllo, K. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies in family violence (pp. 47-62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
