Brush, L. D. (2003). Gender & governance. Lanham, MD: Alta Mira.
2.
Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (1993). The scientific evidence is not conclusive: Arrest is no panacea. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 337-356). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (Eds.). (1996). Do arrests and restraining orders work?Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Coker, D. (2000). Shifting power for battered women: Law, material resources, and poor women of color. University of California Davis Law Review, 33, 1009-1055.
5.
Dutton, M. A. (1992). Empowering and healing the battered woman: A model for assessment and intervention. New York: Springer.
6.
Fagan, J. (1998). Legal interventions in family violence: Research findings and policy implications. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice. Retrieved January 12, 2004, from www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles/17166.pdf
7.
Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and recovery. New York: Basic Books.
8.
Hirschel, D.,& Buzawa, E. (2002). Understanding the context of dual arrest with directions for future research. Violence Against Women, 8, 1449-1473.
9.
Iovanni, L., & Miller, S. L. (2001). Criminal justice system responses to domestic violence: Law enforcement and the courts. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson,& R. K. Bergen, (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 303-327). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Kimmel, M. S. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: Asubstantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8, 1332-1363.
11.
MacKinnon, C. (2003). Women and law: The power to change. In R. Morgan (Ed.), Sisterhood is forever: The women’s anthology for a new millennium (pp. 447-455). New York: Washington Square Press.
12.
Martin, M. (1997). Double your trouble: Dual arrest in family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 139-157.
13.
Miller, S. L. (1989). Unintended side effects of pro-arrest policies and their race and class implications for battered women: A cautionary note. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 3, 299-316.
14.
Miller, S. L. (2000). Mandatory arrest and domestic violence: Continuing questions. In R. Muraskin& T. Alleman (Eds.), It’s a crime: Women and justice (pp. 287-310). New York: McGraw-Hill.
15.
Moe, A. M., & Bell, M. P. (2004). Abject economics: The effects of battering and violence on women’s work and employability. Violence Against Women, 10, 29-55.
16.
Ptacek, J. (1999). Battered women in the courtroom: The power of judicial responses. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
17.
Raphael, J. (2000). Saving Bernice: Battered women, welfare, and poverty. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
18.
Riger, S., Ahrens, C., & Blickenstaff, A. (2000). Measuring interference with employment and education reported by women with abusive partners: Preliminary data. Violence and Victims, 15, 161-172.
19.
Saunders, D. G. (1995). The tendency to arrest victims of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 147-158.
20.
Saunders, D. G. (2002). Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends amajor social problem? A review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8, 1424-1448.
21.
Schneider, E. M. (2000). Battered women& feminist lawmaking. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
23.
Zorza, J. (1994). Must we stop arresting batterers? Analysis and implications of new police domestic violence studies. New York: National Center on Women& Family Law.