Welfare reforms enacted in 1996 require that recipients work to receive benefits. Advocates for battered women feared that abusive men would escalate violence in response to independence brought to women by employment. Yet research on employment, domestic violence, and welfare reform has yielded mixed findings. The authors review those findings and propose that a context-sensitive social-psychological perspective identifying relevant dimensions of culture and measuring partner’s employment may be more useful than a focus only on characteristics of women. Findings suggest that inclusion of generous work supportsin welfare legislation may help reducepoverty and domestic violence.
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
2.
Beecroft, E., Cahill, K., & Goodson, B. D. (2002). The impacts of welfare reform on children: The Indiana welfare reform evaluation. Cambridge, MA: ABT Associates.
3.
Bell, H. (2003). Cycles within cycles: Domestic violence, welfare and low-wage work. Violence Against Women, 9, 1245-1262.
4.
Belle, D., & Doucet, J. (2003). Poverty, inequality, and discrimination: Sources of depression among U. S. women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 101-113.
5.
Bernstein, J. (2003, September 26). Who’s poor? Don’t ask the census bureau. The New York Times, p. A25-A25.
6.
Blank, R. M. (2002). Evaluating welfare reform in the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, XL, 1105-1166.
7.
Brady, D. (2003). Rethinking the sociological measurement of poverty. Social Forces, 81, 715-751.
8.
Brandwein, R. (1999). Family violence and welfare use: Report from the field. In R. A. Brandwein (Ed.), Battered women, children and welfare reform (pp. 45-58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Brauner, S., & Loprest, P. (1999). Where are they now? What states’ studies of people who left welfare tell us (Series A, No. A-32). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
10.
Brooks, M. G., & Buckner, J. C. (1996). Work and welfare: Job histories, barriers to employment, and predictors of work among low-income single mothers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 66, 526-537.
11.
Brown, S. G., & Barbosa, G. (2001). Nothing is going to stop me now: Obstacles perceived by low-income women as they become self-sufficient. Public Health Nursing, 18, 364-372.
12.
Brush, L. D. (2000). Battering, traumatic stress and welfare-to-work transition. Violence Against Women, 6, 1039-1065.
13.
Brush, L. D. (2001). Poverty, battering, race, and welfare reform: Black-White differences in women’s welfare-to-work transitions. Journal of Poverty, 5, 67-89.
14.
Brush, L. D. (2002). Work-related abuse: Areplication, new items, and persistent questions. Violence & Victims, 17, 743-757.
15.
Brush, L. D. (2003). Effects of work on hitting and hurting. Violence Against Women, 9, 1213-1230.
16.
Brush, L. D. (in press). Battering and the poverty trap. Journal of Poverty.
17.
Busch, N. B., & Wolfer, T. A. (2002). Battered women speak out: Welfare reform and their decisions to disclose. Violence against Women, 8, 566-584.
18.
Cancian, M., Haveman, R., Kaplan, T., Meyer, D., & Wolfe, B. (1999). Work, earnings, and well-being after welfare: What do we know?Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, Institute for Research on Poverty.
19.
Coiro, M. J. (2001). Depressive symptoms among women receiving welfare. Women & Health, 32, 1-23.
20.
Collins, P. H. (1998). The tie that binds: Race, gender and U.S. violence. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21, 917-938.
21.
Corcoran, M., Danziger S. K., Kalil, A., & Seefeldt, K. S. (2000). How welfare reform is affecting women’s work. In Annual Review of Sociology (Vol. 26, pp. 241-269). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
22.
Coulton, C. J. (2003). Metropolitan inequities and the ecology of work: Implications for welfare reform. Social Service Review, 77, 159-190.
23.
Danziger, S., Corcoran, M., Danziger, S., & Heflin, C. M. (2000). Work, income, and material hardship after welfare reform. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 34, 6-30.
24.
Danziger, S. K., Corcoran, M., Danziger, S., Heflin, C., Kalil, A., Levine, J., et al. (2000). Barriers to the employment of welfare recipients. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Poverty Research and Training Center.
25.
Danziger, S. K., Heflin, C., Corcoran, M., Oltmans, E., & Wang, H.-C. (2002). Does it pay to move from welfare to work?Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy.
26.
Danziger, S., & Seefeldt, K. (2002). Barriers to employment and the “hard to serve”: Implications for services, sanctions and time limits. Focus, 22, 76-81.
27.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369-389.
28.
Dooley, D. (2003). Unemployment, underemployment, and mental health: Conceptualizing employment status as a continuum. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 9-20.
29.
Dutton, M. A. (1996). Battered women’s strategic response to violence: The role of context. In J. Edleson & Z. Eisikovits (Eds.), Future interventions with battered women and their families (pp. 105-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Edin, K. (2000). What do low-income single mothers say about marriage?Social Problems, 47, 112-133.
31.
Farmer, A., & Tiefenthaler, J. (1997). An economic analysis of domestic violence. Review of Social Economy, 55, 337-358.
32.
Fox, G. L.,Benson, M., DeMaris, A. A.,& Van Wyk, J. (2002). Economic distress and intimate violence: Testing family stress and resources theories. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 64, 793-807.
33.
Fraker, T. M., Ross, C. M., Stapulonis, R. A., Olsen, R. B., Kovac, M. D., Dion, M. R., et al. (2002). The evaluation of welfare reform in Iowa: Final impact report. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
34.
Gennetian, L. A. (2003). Welfare policy and domestic abuse among single mothers. Violence Against Women, 9, 1171-1190.
35.
Gennetian, L. A., & Miller, C. (2002). Children and welfare reform: A view from an experimental welfare program in Minnesota. Child Development, 73, 601-620.
36.
Gibson, C. M., Magnuson, K., Gennetian, L. A., Duncan, G. J., & England, U. (2003). Does employment protect women from domestic violence?New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
37.
Griswold, E. A., Pearson, J., & Thoennes, N. (2000). New directions for child support agencies: When domestic violence is an issue. Policy & Practice of Public Human Services, 58, 29-36.
38.
Grogger, J., Karoly, L. A., & Klerman, J. A. (2002). Consequences of welfare reform: A research synthesis (DRU-2676-DHHS). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
39.
Hamilton, G. (2002). Moving people from welfare to work: Lessons from the National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies. New York: Manpower Demonstration Corporation.
40.
Hamilton, G., Freedman, S., Gennetian, L. A., Michalopoulous, C., Walter, J., Adams-Ciardullo, D., et al. (2001). How effective are different welfare-to-work approaches? Five-year adult and child impacts. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
41.
Harris, I. B. (1996). Children in jeopardy: Can we break the cycle of poverty?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42.
Harris, K. M. (1993). Work and welfare among single mothers in poverty. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 317-352.
43.
Hetling-Wernyj, A., & Born, C. E. (2002). Domestic violence and welfare receipt in Maryland: Are domestic violence victims different from other welfare recipients?Baltimore, MD: University of Maryland, School of Social Work, Welfare and Child Support Research and Training Group.
44.
Honeycutt, T. C., Marshall, L. L., & Weston, R. (2001). Toward ethnically specific models of employment, public assistance, and victimization. Violence Against Women, 7, 126-140.
45.
Horwitz, S. M., & Kerker, B. D. (2001). Impediments to employment under welfare reform: The importance of physical health and psychosocial characteristics. Women & Health, 32, 101-117.
46.
Hotaling, G. T., & Sugarman, D. B. (1990). A risk marker analysis of assaulted wives. Journal of Family Violence, 5, 1-13.
47.
Hoynes, H. W. (2000). Local labor markets and welfare spells: Do demand conditions matter?Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 351-368.
48.
Jencks, C., & Edin, K. (1990). The real welfare problem. American Prospect, 1, 31-50.
49.
Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 57, 283-294.
50.
Johnston-Robledo, I., & Saris, R. N. (2002).“We all need different kinds of help”: Poor women’s perspectives on welfare reform. In L. H. Collins, M. R. Dunlap, et al., (Eds.), Charting a new course for feminist psychology(pp. 323-347). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.
51.
Jones-DeWeever, A., Peterson, J., & Song, X. (2003). Before and after welfare reform: The work and well-being of low-income single parent families. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.
52.
Julnes, G., Fan, X., & Hayashi, K. (2001). Understanding self-sufficiency in welfare leavers in Illinois: Elaborating models with psychosocial factors. In G. Julnes & E. M. Foster (Eds.), Welfare Reform Evaluation special report (No. 91). Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Program Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services.
53.
Kalil, A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Seefeldt, K. S. (2001). Correlates of employment among welfare recipients: Do psychological characteristics and attitudes matter?American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 701-723.
54.
Kaushal, N., & Kaestner, R. (2001). From welfare to work: Has welfare reform worked?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 699-719.
55.
Kim, R. Y. (2000). Factors associated with employment status of parents receiving Temporary Assistance to Needy Families. Social Work Research, 24, 211-222.
56.
Lehrer, E. L., Crittenden, K., & Norr, K. F. (2002). Depression and economic self-sufficiency among inner-city minority mothers. Social Science Research, 31, 285-309.
57.
Lewis, D., Carvalho, I., & Nelson, B. A. (n.d.). Identity, work and welfare reform: A qualitative analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Institute for Policy Research.
58.
Lewis, D., Lee, B. J., & Altenbernd, L. (2001). Serious mental illness and welfare reform. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Institute for Policy Research.
59.
Libbus, M. K., Sable, M. R., Huneke, D., & Anger, K. (1999). Domestic violence and implications for welfare-to-work: Aqualitative investigation. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 14, 1-15.
60.
Lichter, D. T., & Jayakody, R. (2002). Welfare reform: How do we measure success?Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 117-141.
61.
Loprest, P. (2003). Fewer welfare leavers employed in weak economy. Washington DC: Urban Institute.
62.
Macmillan, R., & Gartner, R. (1999). When she brings home the bacon: Labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 61, 947-958.
63.
Mancuso, D. C., & Lindler, V. L. (2001). Assessing the circumstances of TANF leavers and sanctioned families in Sonoma County. Burlingame, CA: SPHERE Institute.
64.
Marshall. L. L., & Weston, R. (2001, May). Partner’s abuse of low-income inner-city women. Paper presented at the National Institute of Justice Domestic Violence and Welfare Grantee Cluster Meeting, Washington, DC.
65.
McCloskey, L. (1996). Socioeconomic and coercive power within the family. Gender & Society, 10, 449-463.
66.
Meier, J. (1997). Domestic violence, character, and social change in the welfare reform debate. Violence Against Women, 5, 619-640.
67.
Meisel, J., Chandler, D., & Rienzi, B. M. (2003). Domestic violence prevalence and effects on employment in two California TANF populations. Violence Against Women, 9, 1191-1212.
68.
Moffit, R. A., & Cherlin, A. J. (2002, February). Disadvantage among families remaining on welfare (JCPR Working Paper 301). Retrieved November 3, 2003, from the Joint Center for Poverty Research web site: http://www.jcpr.org/wpfiles/moffitt_cherlin_%20revSRI01.pdf
69.
Moore, T., & Selkowe, V. (1999). Domestic violence victims in transition from welfare to work: Barriers to self-sufficiency and the W-2 response. Milwaukee: Institute for Wisconsin’s Future.
70.
Murphy, P. A. (1997). Recovering from the effects of domestic violence: Implications for welfare reform policy. Law & Policy, 19, 169-182.
71.
Olson, K., & Pavetti, L. (1996). Personal and family challenges to the successful transition from welfare to work. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
72.
Pearson, J., Griswold, E. A., & Thoennes, N. (2001). Balancing safety and self-sufficiency: Lessons on serving victims of domestic violence for child support and public assistance agencies. Violence Against Women, 7, 176-192.
73.
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-193, 42 U.S.C.A. º 1305 et seq. Retrieved November 3, 2003, from http://uscode.house.%20gov/
74.
Petterson, S., & Friel, L. (2001). Psychological distress, hopelessness, and welfare recipiency. Women and Health, 32, 79-99.
75.
Polit, D. F., Widom, R., Edin, K., Bowie, S., London, A. S., Scott, E. K., et al. (2001). Is work enough? The experiences of current and former welfare mothers who work. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
76.
Postmus, J. (2003). Valuable assistance or missed opportunities? Shelters and the Family Violence Option. Violence Against Women, 9, 1278-1288.
77.
Proctor, B. D., & Dalaker, J. (2003). Poverty in the United States: 2002 (U.S. Census Bureau Publication No. P60-222). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
78.
Raphael, J. (1997). Welfare reform: Prescription for abuse? Are port on new research studies documenting the relationship of domestic violence and welfare. Law & Policy, 19, 123-137.
79.
Raphael, J. (2001a). Domestic violence as a welfare-to-work barrier: Research and theoretical issues. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 443-456). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80.
Raphael, J. (2001b). Public housing and domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 7, 699-706.
81.
Raphael, J., & Haennicke, S. (1998). The Family Violence Option: An early assessment. Chicago: Center for Impact Research.
82.
Riger, S., Ahrens, C., & Blickenstaff, A. (2000). Measuring interference with employment and education reported by women with abusive partners: Preliminary data. Violence & Victims, 15, 161-172.
83.
Riger, S., & Krieglstein, M. (2000). The impact of welfare reform on men’s violence against women. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 631-647.
84.
Riger, S., Staggs, S. L., & Schewe, P. A. (2003). Intimate partner violence as an obstacle to employment among mothers affected by welfare reform. Manuscript submitted for publication.
85.
Rodriguez, E., Lasch, K. E., Chandra, P., & Lee, J. (2001). Family violence, employment status, welfare benefits, and alcohol drinking in the United States: What is the relation?Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 55, 172-178.
86.
Romero, D., Chavkin, W., Wise, P. H., & Smith, L. A. (2003). Low-income mothers’ experience with poor health, hardship, work and violence: Implications for policy. Violence Against Women, 9, 1231-1244.
87.
Romero, D., Chavkin, W., Wise, P. H., Smith, L. A., & Wood, P. R. (2002). Welfare to work? Impact of maternal health on employment. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1462-1468.
88.
Sable, M. R., Libbus, M. K., Huneke, D., & Anger K. (1999). Domestic violence among AFDC recipients: Implications for welfare-to-work programs. Affilia, 14, 199-216.
89.
Scott, E. K., London, A. S., & Myers, N. A. (2002). Dangerous dependencies: The intersection of welfare reform and domestic violence. Gender & Society, 16, 878-897.
90.
Smith, M. W. (2001). Abuse and work among poor women: Evidence from Washington state. Worker Well-Being in a Changing Labor Market, 20, 67-102.
91.
Smith, P. H., Smith, J. B., & Earp, J. A. (1999). Beyond the measurement trap: A reconstructed conceptualization and measurement of woman battering. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 177-193.
92.
Speiglman, L., Fujiwama, L., Norris, J., & Green, R. S. (1999). Alameda County Calworks needs assessment: A look at potential health-related barriers to self-sufficiency. Berkeley, CA: Public Health Institute.
93.
Sutherland, C. A., Bybee, D. L., & Sullivan, C. M. (2002). Beyond bruises and broken bones: The joint effects of stress and injuries on women’s health. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 609-636.
94.
Tauchen, H., & Witte, A. D. (2001). The dynamics of domestic violence. Effect of Institutions on Economic Behavior, 85, 414-418.
95.
Taylor, M. J., Barusch, A. S., & Vogel, M. B. (2000). Multiple impacts of welfare reform in Utah. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah, Graduate School of Social Work, Social Research Institute.
96.
Tolman, R. M., Danziger, S., & Rosen, D. (2002). Domestic violence and economic well being of current and former welfare recipients. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, School of Social Work, Michigan Program on Poverty and Social Welfare Policy.
97.
Tolman, R. M., & Raphael, J. (2001). Areview of research on welfare and domestic violence. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 655-682.
98.
Tolman, R. M., & Rosen, D. (2001). Domestic violence in the lives of women receiving welfare. Violence Against Women, 7, 655-682.
99.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). Percent change in AFDC/TANF families and recipients: August 1996–September 2001. Retrieved November 3,2003, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/news/stats/afdc.htm
100.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2002). Temporary Assistance to Needy Families: Fourth annual report to congress. Retrieved November 3, 2003, from http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/opre/ar2001/indexar.htm
101.
Votruba-Drzal, E., Lohman, B., & Chase-Lansdale, P. L. (2002). Violence in intimate relationships as women transition from welfare to work. Chicago: Northwestern University, Joint Center for Poverty Research.
