Despite evidence of a cultural shift in orientations toward violence, the problem of violence against women persists across a range of different societies. The preoccupation with the psychology of violence and the focus on cultural orientations obscure the more salient features of social life that promote violence: the structure of interpersonal relationships. The exploration of sociodemographic correlates and the search for “risk factors” of intimate partner violence have overshadowed the inclusion of a distinct set of social structural characteristics that are conducive to domestic violence. The current article draws on comparative research and Donald Black’s theoretical approach to argue that key factors include (a) the degree of social isolation, (b) interdependence of support networks, (c) inequality, (d) relational distance, (e) centralization of authority, and (f) exposure to violent networks. The weak explanatory power of previous research can be improved by developing measures to evaluate an integrated structural model of violence against women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldarondo, E., Kantor, G. K.,& Jasinski, J. L. (2002). Arisk marker analysis of wife assault in Latino families . Violence Against Women, 8, 429-454 .
2.
Allan, B. (1991). Wife abuse—The impact on children. Ottawa: National Clearinghouse on Family Violence, Health Canada .
3.
Alliance of Five Research Centres on Violence. (2002). Challenging violence against women and children, and family violence through academically-linked community-based research. Retrieved from www.uwo.ca/violence/linked/alliance/english.htm
4.
Baumgartner, M. P. (1993). Violent networks: The origins and management of domestic conflict. In R. B. Felson& J. T. Tedeschi (Eds.), Aggression and violence: Social interactionist perspectives(pp. 209-231). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
5.
Belsky, J. (1980). Child maltreatment: An ecological integration . American Psychologist, 35, 320-335 .
6.
Black, D. (1976). The behavior of law. New York: Academic Press .
7.
Black, D. (1990). The elementary forms of conflict management. Newdirections in the study of justice, law, and social control(pp. 43-69). New York: Plenum .
8.
Black, D. (1998). The social structure of right and wrong. San Diego, CA: Academic Press .
9.
Brown, J. K. (1992). Introduction. In D. A. Counts, J. K. Brown,& J. C. Campbell (Eds.), Sanctions and sanctuary: Cross-cultural perspectives on the beating of wives. Boulder, CO: Westview .
10.
Brownridge, D. A. (2002). Cultural variation in male partner violence against women . Violence Against Women, 8, 87-115 .
11.
Brownridge, D. A.,& Halli, S. S. (1999). Measuring family violence: The conceptualization andutilization of prevalence andincidence rates . Journal of FamilyViolence, 14, 333-350 .
12.
Bunge, V. P. (2000). Spousal violence. In Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile(Catalogue No. 85-224-XIE, pp. 11-26). Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Industry .
13.
Bunge, V. P.,& Sauvé, J. (2002). Declines in spousal homicides. In Family Violence in Canada: A statistical profile(Catalogue No. 85-224-XIE, pp. 9-12). Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Industry .
14.
Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. (1999). Agraphical overview of crime and the administration of criminal justice in Canada, 1998. Ottawa: Statistics Canada .
15.
Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. (2001). Canadian crime statistics 2000. Ottawa: Statistics Canada .
16.
Colson, E. (1953). Social control andvengeance in PlateauTonga society . Africa, 23, 199-212 .
17.
Cooney, M. (1998). Warriors and peacemakers: Howthird parties shape violence. NewYork: New York University Press .
18.
Counts, D. A., Brown, J. K.,& Campbell, J. C. (1992). Sanctions and sanctuary: Cultural perspectives on the beating of wives. Boulder, CO: Westview .
19.
Cribb, J., & Barnett, R. (1997). Being bashed: Western Samoan women’s responses to domestic violence inWestern Samoa andNew Zealand . Gender, Place, and Culture, 6, 49-65 .
20.
DeKeseredy, W. S. (1990). Male peer support andwomanabuse: The current state of knowledge . Sociological Focus, 23, 129-139 .
21.
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against patriarchy. New York: Free Press .
22.
Duffy, A., & Momirov, J. (1997). Family violence: A Canadian introduction. Toronto, Canada: Lorimer .
23.
Dutton, D. G. (1999). Limitations of social learning models in explaining intimate aggression. In X. B. Arriaga & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Violence in intimate relationships(pp. 73-87). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
24.
Egeland, B. (1993). Ahistory of abuse is a major risk factor for abusing the next generation. In R. J. Gelles& D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence(pp. 197-208). Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
25.
EKOS Research Associates. (2002). Public attitudes toward family violence: Asyndicated study, final report. Ottawa, Canada: Author .
26.
Ellsberg, M., Pena, R., Herrera, A., Lijiestrand, J.,& Winkvist, A. (2001). Wife abuse among womenof childbearing age in Nicaragua . American Journal of Public Health, 89, 241-244 .
27.
Erchak, G. M., & Rosenfeld, R. (1994). Societal isolation, violent norms, and gender relations: A reexamination and extension of Levinson’s model of wife beating . Cross-Cultural Research, 28, 111-133 .
28.
Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866-884 .
29.
Fitzgerald, R. (1999). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile, 1999. Ottawa: Statistics Canada .
30.
Florida Department of Corrections. (1999). Florida’s perspective on domestic violence: A 1999 survey of public opinion. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Corrections, Bureau of Research and Data Analysis .
31.
Gelles, R. J. (1983). An exchange/social control theory. In R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hoteling, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families: Current family violence research(pp. 151-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
32.
Gelles, R. J. (1993). Through a sociological lens: Social structure and family violence. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence(pp. 31-46). Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
33.
Giles-Sims, J. (1983). Wife beating: A systems theory approach. New York: Guilford .
34.
Gordon, M. (2000). Definitional issues in violence against women . Violence AgainstWomen, 6, 747-783 .
35.
Grandin, E.,& Lupri, E. (1997). Intimate violence in Canada and the United States: Acrosscultural comparison . Journal of Family Violence, 12, 417-443 .
36.
Hagemann-White, C. (2001). European research on the prevalence of violence against women . Violence Against Women, 7, 732-759 .
37.
Haj-Yahia, M. M. (2000). The incidence of wife abuse and battering and some sociodemographic correlates as revealed by two national surveys in Palestinian society . Journal of Family Violence, 15, 347-374 .
38.
Harrison, D. (2002). The first casualty: Violence against women in Canadian military communities. Toronto, Canada: Lorimer .
39.
Harvey, P., & Gow, P. (Eds.). (1994). Sex and violence: Issues in representation and experience. London: Routledge .
40.
Heise, L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework . Violence Against Women, 4, 262-291 .
41.
Hoffman, K. L., Demo, D. H.,& Edwards, J. N. (1994). Physical wife abuse in a non-Western society: An integrated theoretical approach . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 131-146 .
Huang, C. J., & Gunn, T. (2001). An examination of domestic violence in an African-American community in North Carolina: Causes and consequences . Journal of Black Studies, 31, 790-811 .
44.
Jaffe, P., Wolfe, D.,& Wilson, S. (1990). Children of battered women. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
Jewkes, R., Levin, J.,& Loveday, P. (2002). Risk factors for domestic violence: Findings from a South African cross-sectional study . Social Science and Medicine, 55, 1603-1617 .
47.
Johnson, H., & Hotton, T. (2001). Spousal violence. In Family violence in Canada: Astatistical profile 2001(pp. 26-41). Ottawa: Statistics Canada, CanadianCentre for Justice Statistics .
48.
Kim, K.,& Cho, Y. (1992). Epidemiological survey of spousal abuse in Korea. In E. C. Viano (Ed.), Intimate violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives(pp. 277-282). Washington, DC: Hemisphere .
49.
Klein, R. C.,& Milardo, R. M. (2000). The social context of couple conflict: Support and criticism frominformal thirdparties . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 618-637 .
50.
Lazarus-Black, M. (2001). Law and the pragmatics of inclusion: Governing domestic violence in Trinidad and Tobago . American Ethnologist, 28, 388-416 .
51.
Levinson, D. (1989). Family violence in cross-cultural perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
52.
Loue, S. (2000). Intimate partner violence: Bridging the gap between law and science . Journal of Legal Medicine, 21, 1-34 .
53.
Mahajan, A. (1995). Family violence and abuse in India. New Delhi, India: Deep and Deep Publications .
54.
Maundeni, T. (2002). Wife abuse among a sample of divorced women in Botswana: A research note . Violence Against Women, 8, 257-275 .
55.
McClusky, L. J. (1999). Domestic violence among Belizean Maya . Humanity and Society, 23, 319-338 .
56.
McKee, L. (1992). Men’s rights/women’s wrongs: Domestic violence in Ecuador. In D. A. Counts, J. K. Brown, & J. C. Campbell (Eds.), Sanctions and sanctuary: Cultural perspectives on the beating of wives(pp. 139-156). Boulder, CO: Westview .
57.
Media Education Foundation. (1999). Tough guise: Violence, media, and the crisis in masculinity. Toronto, Canada: Kineticvideo.com .
58.
Michalski, J. H. (1995). Ashelter for abused and neglected older adults: Needs assessment and feasibility study. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Network for the Prevention of Elder Abuse .
59.
Michalski, J. H. (1999). Values and preferences for the “best policy mix” for Canadian children (CPRN Discussion Paper No. F05). Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks .
60.
Michalski, J. H. (2002, June). Explaining two rates of intimate partner violence: Howlaw and society matter in making sociological sense out of official statistics and self-reports . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association, University of Toronto, Ontario.
61.
Mihalic, S. W.,& Elliott, D. (1997). Asocial learning theory model of marital violence . Journal of Family Violence, 12, 21-47 .
62.
Moreno, C. L., El-Bassel, N., Gilbert, L., & Wada, T. (2002). Correlates of poverty and partner abuse among women on methadone . Violence Against Women, 8, 455-475 .
63.
Nash, J. (1992). Factors relating to infrequent domestic violence among the Nagovisi. In D. A. Counts, J. K. Brown, & J. C. Campbell (Eds.), Sanctions and sanctuary: Cultural perspectives on the beating of wives(pp. 99-110). Boulder, CO: Westview .
Neilsen, J. M., Endo, R. K., & Ellington, B. L. (1992). Social isolation and wife abuse: A research report. In E. C. Viano (Ed.), Intimate violence(pp. 49-59). Washington, DC: Hemisphere .
66.
Ofei-Aboagye, R. (1997). Tradition or tribulation: Thoughts on women’s oppression and wife abuse in Ghana. In A. Sev’er (Ed.), Across-cultural exploration of wife abuse(pp. 123-144). Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press .
67.
O’Leary, K. D. (1993). Through a psychological lens: Personality traits, personality disorders, and levels of violence. In R. J. Gelles& D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence(pp. 7-30). Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
68.
Puzone, C. A., Saltzman, L. E., Kresnow, M., Thompson, M. P., & Mercy, J. A. (2000). National trends in intimate partner homicide . Violence Against Women, 6, 409-426 .
69.
Randall, M., & Haskell, L. (1995). Sexual violence in women’s lives: Findings from the Women’s Safety Project, a community-based survey . Violence Against Women, 1, 6-31 .
70.
Rao, V. (1997). Wife-beating in rural South India: A qualitative and econometric analysis . Social Science and Medicine, 44, 1169-1180 .
71.
Reitzel-Jaffe, D., & Wolfe, D. (2001). Predictors of relationship abuse among young men . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 99-115 .
72.
Rodgers, K. (1994). Wife assault: The findings of a national survey(Catalogue No. 85-002-XPE, Vol. 14, No. 9) Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Industry .
73.
Rummel, R. J. (1994). Death by government. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books .
74.
Sanday, P. R. (1981). The socio-cultural context of rape: A cross-cultural study . Journal of Social Issues, 37, 5-27 .
75.
Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (2000). Aggregation bias and woman abuse: Variations in male peer support, region, language, and school type . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 555-565 .
76.
Sev’er, A. (1997). Introduction. In A. Sev’er (Ed.), A cross-cultural exploration of wife abuse (pp. 1-26). Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press .
77.
Sev’er, A. (2002). Fleeing the house of horrors: Women who have left abusive partners. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press .
78.
Smith, M. D. (1990). Sociodemographic risk factors in wife abuse: Results from a survey of Toronto women . Canadian Journal of Sociology, 15, 39-58 .
79.
Straus, M. A. (1973). A general systems theory approach to a theory of violence between family members . Social Science Information, 12, 105-125 .
80.
Statistics Canada. (2000, October 18). Homicide statistics. The Daily, pp. 1-4.
81.
Trainor, C., Lambert, M., & Dauvergne, M. (2002). Spousal violence. In Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile 2002(Catalogue No. 85-224-XIE, pp. 6-25). Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Industry .
82.
Tucker, J.,& Ross, S. (in press). Corporal punishment and Black’s theory of social control. In M. Donnelly & M. Straus (Eds.), Corporal punishment by parents in theoretical perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
83.
Tweed, R. G., & Dutton, D. G. (1998). A comparison of impulsive and instrumental subgroups of batterers . Violence and Victims, 13, 217-229 .
84.
Weir, E. (2000). Wife assault in Canada . Canadian Medical Association Journal, 163, 328-328 .
85.
Widom, C. (1989). The cycle of violence . Science, 244, 160-166 .
86.
Wolfgang, M., & Ferracuti, F. (1982). The subculture of violence. London: Tavistock .
87.
Yllö, K. A. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence(pp. 47-62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
88.
Yllö, K. A., & Bograd, M. (Eds.). (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
