Sexist attitudes and rape-supporting beliefs have long been linked to relationship aggression and sexual coercion. This study investigates how recent developments in the conceptualization and measurement of these variables are related to each other and how they are related to aggressive and coercive behaviors. Second-generation measures of sexism and rape-supporting beliefs were found to be related to each other and to aggressive and sexually coercive behaviors. Relationships between attitude measures appeared to be based primarily on shared belief systems, whereas relationships between attitude measures and aggressive behavior appeared to be based primarily on generalized hostility toward women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benokraitis, N. V., & Feagin, J. R. (1995). Modern sexism (2nd ed.). Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simonon & Schuster.
3.
Burt, M. A. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
4.
Campbell, B., Schellenberg, E. G., & Senn, C. Y. (1997). Evaluating measures of contemporary sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 89-102.
5.
Check, J. V. P., Malamuth, N. M., Elias, B.,& Barton, S. (1985, April). Onhostile ground. Psychology Today, 19, 56-61.
6.
Dean, K. E.,& Malamuth, N. M. (1997). Characteristics of men who aggress sexually and of men who imagine aggressing: Risk and moderating variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 449-455.
7.
Dwyer, D. (2000). Interpersonal relationships. New York: Routledge.
8.
Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543-558.
9.
Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1993). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. In W. Strobe & M. Newstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 1-35). New York: John Wiley.
10.
Forbes, G. B.,& Adams-Curtis, L. (2001). Experiences with sexual coercion in college males and females: Role of family conflict, sexist attitudes, acceptance of rape myths, selfesteem, and the Big-5 personality factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 865-889.
11.
Gaertner, L., & Foshee, V. (1999). Commitment and the perpetration of relationship violence. Personal Relationships, 6, 227-239.
12.
Gelles, R. J. (1974). The violent home. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Gelles, R. J. (1979). Family violence. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323-1333.
15.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
16.
Glick, P.,& Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119-135.
17.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
18.
Holm, S. (1979). Asimple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65-70.
19.
Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. J.,& Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of students in higher education. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162-170.
20.
Koss, M. P.,& Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual Experiences Survey: Aresearch instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455-457.
21.
Lonsway, K. A. (1996). Preventing acquaintance rape through education: What do we know? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 229-265.
22.
Lonsway, K. A.,& Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology ofWomen Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
23.
Lonsway, K. A.,& Fitzgerald, L. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704-711.
24.
Malamuth, N. M.(1981). Rape proclivity amongmales. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 138-157.
25.
Malamuth, N. M., Linz, D., Heavey, C. L.,& Barnes, G. (1995). Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men’s conflict with women: A10-year follow-up study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 353-369.
26.
Malamuth, N. M., Sockloskie, R. J., Koss, M. P., & Tanaka, J. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors againstwomen: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 670-681.
27.
McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91-125). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
28.
McHugh, M. C.,& Frieze, I. H. (1997). The measurement of gender-role attitudes: Areview and commentary. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 1-16.
29.
O’Keefe, M. (1997). Predictors of dating violence among high school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 546-568.
30.
Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A.,& Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27-68.
31.
Sanday, P. R. (1990). Fraternity gang rape: Sex, brotherhood, and privilege on campus. New York: New York University Press.
32.
Sanday, P. R. (1996). Awoman scorned: Acquaintance rape on trial. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
Sears, D. O. (1988). Symbolic racism. In P. A. Katz& D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 53-84). New York: Plenum.
34.
Spence, J. T., & Hahn, E. D. (1997). The Attitude TowardWomen Scale and attitude change in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 17-34.
35.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1972). The Attitudes TowardWomen Scale: An objective instrumentto measure the attitudes towardthe rights and roles ofwomenin contemporary society (Ms. No. 153). JSAS: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66-67.
36.
Spence, J. T.,& Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
37.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 75-88.
38.
Straus, M. A. (1990). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scale. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 29-47). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
39.
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Oldfashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199-214.
40.
Swim, J. K.,& Cohen, L. L. (1997). Overt, covert, and subtle sexism: Acomparison between the Attitudes Toward Women and Modern Sexism scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 103-118.
41.
Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M.,& Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: Plus ca change, plus c’est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842-849.
42.
Twenge, J. M. (1997). Attitudes toward women, 1970-1995. Psychology ofWomen Quarterly, 21, 35-51.
43.
White, J. W.,& Humphrey, J. A. (1991). Young people’s attitudes toward acquaintance rape. In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 43-69). New York: John Wiley.
