Some feminists have argued that rape myths constrain women’s reporting of sexual assault to the police. The authors investigated whether myth-associated characteristics of sexual assaults play a role in police reporting behaviors of women. A sample of 186 sexual assault cases seen at a hospital-based sexual assault care center in 1994 was analyzed using logistic regression. A positive association was found between reporting a sexual assault to the police and two overtly violent components of the “real rape” myth: the use of physical force and the occurrence of physical injury.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrias, R. T. (1992). Rape myths. A persistent problem in defining and prosecuting rape. Criminal Justice, 7, 3-7, 51-53.
2.
Bachman, R. (1993). Predicting the reporting of rape victimizations. Have rape reforms made a difference? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 254-270.
3.
Bachman, R. (1998). The factors related to rape reporting behavior and arrest. New evidence from the National Crime Victimization Survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 8-29.
4.
Bachman, R., & Paternoster, R. (1993). A contemporary look at the effects of rape law reform: How far have we really come? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 84, 554-574.
5.
Binder, R. (1981). Why women don’t report. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 42, 437-438.
6.
Chandler, S. M., & Torney, M. (1981). The decisions and the processing of rape victims through the criminal justice system. California Sociologist, 4, 155-169.
7.
Clark, L., & Lewis, D. (1977). Rape: The price of coercive sexuality. Toronto, Canada: Women’s Press.
8.
Denike, M. (2000). Sexual violence and “fundamental justice”: On the failure of equity reforms to criminal proceedings. Canadian Woman Studies, 20, 151-159.
9.
Department of Justice Canada. (1990). Sexual assault legislation in Canada: An evaluation, Report No. 5. Ottawa: Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
10.
Dukes, R. L., & Mattley, C. L. (1977). Predicting rape victim reportage. Social Science Review, 62, 63-84.
11.
Du Mont, J., Macdonald, S., & Badgley, R. (1997). An overview of the sexual assault care and treatment centres of Ontario. (Available from the Ontario Network of Sexual Assault Care and Treatment Centres, c/o Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 1B2)
12.
Du Mont, J., McGregor, M. J., Myhr, T. L., & Miller, KL. (2000). Predicting legal outcomes from medicolegal findings: An examination of sexual assault in two jurisdictions. Journal of Women’s Health and Law, 1(3), 219-233.
13.
Du Mont, J., & Myhr, T. L. (2000). So few convictions: The role of client-related characteristics in the legal processing of sexual assaults. Violence Against Women, 6, 1109-1136.
14.
@RT=Du Mont, J., & Parnis, D. (in press). Forensic nursing in the context of sexual assault: Comparing the opinions and practices of nurse examiners and nurses? Applied Nursing Research.
15.
Du Mont, J., & Parnis, D. (2000). Sexual assault and legal resolution: Querying the medical collection of forensic evidence. Medicine and Law, 19(4), 779-792.
16.
Du Mont, J., Parnis, D., & the Ontario Network of Sexual Assault Care and Treatment Centres. (2002, September). An overview the sexual assault care and treatment centres of Ontario [Revised and Expanded]. Prepared for the World Health Organization, Geneva. (Available from the Centre for Research in Women’s Health, 7th Floor, 790 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1N8).
17.
Du Mont, J., & Parnis, D. (1999). Judging women: The pernicious effects of rape mythology. Canadian Woman Studies, 19, 102-109.
18.
Easteal, P. W. (1994). Survivors of sexual assault: An Australian survey. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 22, 329-354.
19.
Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape: How the legal system victimizes women who say no. Boston: Harvard University Press.
20.
Estrich, S. (1992). Palm Beach stories. Law and Philosophy, 11, 5-33.
21.
Feldman-Summers, S., & Ashworth, C. D. (1981). Factors related to intentions to report a rape. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 53-70.
22.
Feldman-Summers, S., & Norris, J. (1984). Differences between rape victims who report and those who do not report to a public agency. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 562-573.
23.
Feldman-Summers, S., & Palmer,G. C. (1980). Rape as viewed by judges, prosecutors, and police officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 7, 19-40.
24.
Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
25.
Frazier, P., Candell, S., Arikian, N., & Tofteland, A. (1994). Rape survivors and the legal system. In M. Constanzo & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Violence and the law (pp. 135-158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Frazier, P., & Haney, B. (1996). Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 607-628.
27.
Gartner, R., & Macmillan, R. (1995). The effect of victim-offender relationship on reporting crimes of violence against women. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 393-429.
28.
Golding, J. M., Siegel, J. M., Sorenson, S. B., Burnam, M. A., & Stein, J. A. (1989). Social support following sexual assault. Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 92-106.
29.
Grace, S., Lloyd, C., & Smith, L. J. F. (1992). Rape: From recording to conviction. London: Home Office Research Unit.
30.
Greenberg, M. S., & Ruback, R. B. (1992). After the crime: Victim decision making. New York: Plenum.
31.
Griffiths, J. (1999). Review of the investigation of sexual assaults and Toronto police service. (Available from Toronto Audit Services, 9th floor, Metro Hall, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5V 3C6)
32.
Gunn, R., & Linden, R. (1997). The impact of law reform on the processing of sexual assault cases. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 34, 155-174.
33.
Gunn, R., & Minch, C. (1988). Sexual assault: The dilemma of disclosure, the question of conviction. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
34.
Hattem, T. (2000). Survey of sexual assault survivors (Report No. 2000-4e). Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada.
35.
Hinch, R. (1988). Enforcing the new sexual assault laws: An exploratory study. Atlantis, 14, 109-115.
36.
Hindelang, M. J., & Davis, B. J. (1977). Forcible rape in the United States: A statistical profile. In D. Chappell, R. Geis, & G. Geis (Eds.), Forcible rape (pp. 87-114). New York: Columbia University Press.
37.
Holmstrom, L., & Burgess, A. W. (1978). The victim of rape. New York: John Wiley.
38.
Johnson, H. (1996). Dangerous domains: Violence against women in Canada. Toronto: Nelson Canada.
39.
Jordan, J. (2001). Worlds apart? Women, rape and the police reporting process. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 679-706.
40.
Kerstetter, W. A. (1990). Gateway to justice: Police and prosecutorial response to sexual assaults against women. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81, 267-313.
41.
Kidd, R. F., & Chayet, E. F. (1984).Why do victims fail to report? The psychology of criminal victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 39-50.
42.
LaFree, G. D. (1989). Rape and criminal justice: The social construction of sexual assault. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
43.
Lees, S. (1993). Judicial rape. Women’s Studies International Forum, 16, 11-36.
44.
Lizotte, A. J. (1985). The uniqueness of rape: Reporting assaultive violence to the police. Crime and Delinquency, 31, 169-190.
45.
Martin, P. Y., & Powell, R. M. (1995). Accounting for the second assault: Legal organizations’ framing of rape victims. Law and Social Inquiry, 19, 853-890.
46.
McCahill, T. W., Meyer, L. C., & Fischman, A. M. (1979). The aftermath of rape. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
47.
McGregor, M. J., DuMont, J., & Myhr, T. L. (2002). Sexual assault forensic medical examination: Is evidence related to successful prosecution? Annals of Emergency Medicine, 39, 639-647.
48.
McGregor, M. J., Le, G., Marion, S. A., & Wiebe, E. (1999). Examination for sexual assault: Is the documentation of physical injury associated with the laying of charges? A retrospective cohort study. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 160, 1565-1569.
49.
McGregor, M. J., Lipowska, M, Shah, S., Du Mont, J., & De Siato, C. (in press). An exploratory analysis of drug-facilitated rape cases seen in a hospital emergency department. Women and Health, 37(3).
50.
McGregor, M. J., Wiebe, E., Marion, S. A, & Livingstone, C. (2000). Why don’t more women report sexual assault to the police? (Research letter). Canadian Medical Association Journal, 162, 659-662.
51.
McIntyre, S., Boyle, C., Lakeman, L., & Sheehy, E. (2000). Tracking and resisting backlash against equality gains in sexual offence law. Canadian Woman Studies, 20, 72-83.
52.
Metro Action Committee on Public Violence Against Women and Children. (1994). Sexual assault: A guide to the criminal system. (Available from the Metro Action Committee on Public Violence Against Women and Children, 158 Spadina Road, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5R 2T8)
53.
Minch, C., Linden, R., & Johnson, S. (1987). Attrition in the processing of rape cases. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 29, 389-404.
54.
Neville, H. A., & Pugh, A. O. (1997). General and culture specific factors influencing African American women’s reporting patterns and perceived social support following sexual assault. An exploratory investigation. Violence Against Women, 3, 361-381.
55.
Nightingale, M. (1991). Judicial attitudes and differential treatment: Native women in sexual assault cases. Ottawa Law Review, 23, 71-98.
56.
Parnis, D., & Du Mont, J. (2002). Examining the standardized application of rape kits: An exploratory study of post-sexual assault professional practices. Health Care for Women International, 23(8), 846-853.
57.
Peretti, P. O., & Cozzens, N. (1979). Psychosocial variables of female rapees not reporting and reporting the first incidence of rape. Acta Psychiatrica Belgica, 79, 332-342.
58.
Peretti, P. O., & Cozzens, N. (1983). Characteristics of female rapees not reporting and reporting the first incidence of rape. Corrective and Social Psychiatry Journal of Behavior, Technology, Methods and Therapy, 29, 82-87.
59.
Razack, S. (1994). What is to be gained by looking White people in the eye? Culture, race, and gender in cases of sexual violence. Signs, 19, 894-923.
60.
Renner, K. E., & Wackett, C. (1987). Sexual assault: Social and stranger rape. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 6, 49-56.
61.
Renner, K. E., Wackett, C., & Ganderton, S. (1988). The “social” nature of sexual assault. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 29, 163-173.
62.
Resnick, H., Acierno, R., Holmes, M., Dammeyer, M., & Kilpatrick, D. (2000). Emergency evaluation and intervention with female victims of rape and other violence. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 1317-1333.
63.
Roberts, J. V. (1994). Criminal justice processing of sexual assault cases. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
64.
Roberts, J., & Grossman, M. (1994). Changing definitions of sexual assault: An analysis of police statistics. In J. V. Roberts & R. M. Mohr (Eds.), Confronting sexual assault: Adecade of legal and social change (pp. 57-83). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
65.
Ross, S., & Brereton, D. (1997). An epidemic of violence? Changing patterns in reported rapes in Victoria. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 32, 129-147.
66.
Russell, D. E. H. (1984). Sexual exploitation: Rape, child abuse and workplace harassment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
67.
Russell, M. (1980). Rape victims and police reporting. Canada’s Mental Health, 28, 14-16.
68.
Schwartz, M. D., & Leggett, M. S. (1999). Bad dates or emotional trauma? The aftermath of campus sexual assault. Violence Against Women, 5, 251-271.
69.
Sheehy, E. (2000). From women’s duty to resist to men’s duty to ask: How far have we come? Canadian Woman Studies, 20, 98-104.
70.
Solicitor General Canada. (1985). Female victims of crime. Canadian Urban Victimization Survey, No. 4. Ottawa, Canada: Department of Supply and Services.
71.
Statistics Canada. (1993, November 18). The Violence Against Women Survey: Survey highlights. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, The Daily.
72.
Steketee, G., & Austin, A. (1989). Rape victims and the justice system: Utilization and impact. Social Service Review, 63, 285-303.
73.
Stermac, L., Du Mont, J., & Dunn, S. (1998). Violence in known assailant assaults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 398-412.
74.
Stewart, M. W., Dobbin, S. A., & Gatowski, S. I. (1996). “Real rapes” and “real victims”: The shared reliance on common cultural definitions of rape, Feminist Legal Studies, 4, 159-177.
75.
Tang, K. (1998). Rape law reform in Canada: The success and limits of legislation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42, 258-270.
76.
Temkin, J. (1997). Plus ça change: Reporting rape in the 1990s. British Journal of Criminology, 37, 507-528.
77.
Tomlinson, D. (1999). Police-reporting decisions of sexual assault survivors: An exploration of influential factors. (Available from Calgary Communities Against Sexual Abuse, Calgary, Alberta, Telephone: 403-237-6405)
78.
Tomlinson, D. (2000). Sexual assault: An exploration of survivors’ decisions not to report to police. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
79.
Viano, E. C. (1996). Stereotyping and prejudice: Crime victims and the criminal justice system. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 5, 182-202.
80.
Weis, K., & Borges, S. S. (1973). Victimology and rape: The case of the legitimate victim. Issues in Criminology, 8, 71-115.
81.
Wiehe, V. R., & Richards, A. L. (1995). Intimate betrayal. Understanding and responding to the trauma of acquaintance rape. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
82.
Williams, L. S. (1984). The classic rape: When do victims report? Social Problems, 31, 459-467.
83.
Winkel, F. W., & Vrij, A. (1993). Rape reporting to the police: Exploring the social psychological impact of a persuasive campaign on cognitions, attitudes, normative expectations and reporting intentions. International Review of Victimology, 2, 277-294.
84.
Working Group of Attorneys General Officials. (1992). Gender equality in the Canadian justice system: Summary document and proposals for action. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada.
85.
Wyatt, G. E. (1992). The sociocultural context of African American and White women’s rape. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 77-91.
