An analysis of state-by-state data available on the U.S. Department of Justice Web site revealed that more than 50% of clients served through federally funded crime victim assistance programs in 1999 were domestic violence victims. However, only 13.4% of all crime victim compensation claims were awarded to victims of domestic violence. This disparity provides the basis for a comprehensive research agenda to learn what barriers prevent domestic abuse victims from submitting eligible claims.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Astin, M. C., Lawrence, K. J., & Foy, D. W. (1993). Post traumatic stress disorder among battered women: Risk and resiliency factors. Violence and Victims, 8, 17-28.
2.
Fagan, J. (1996). The criminalization of domestic violence: Promises and limits. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
3.
Fray-Witzer, E. (1999). Twice abused: Same-sex domestic violence and the law. In B. Leventhal & S. E. Lundy (Eds.), Same-sex domestic violence: Strategies for change (pp. 19-42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Hanna, C. (1998). The paradox of hope: The crime and punishment of domestic violence. William & Mary Law Review, 39, 1505.
5.
Hart, B. (1993). Battered women and the criminal justice system. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 624-638.
6.
Koppel, H. (1987). Lifetime likelihood of victimization. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
7.
Miller, N. (1998). Domestic violence legislation affecting police and prosecutor responsibilities in the United States: Inferences from a 50-state review of state statutory codes. Institute for Law and Justice. Retrieved December 7, 2002, from http://www.ilj.org/dv.vawa1.html
8.
Miller, T., Cohen, M., & Wiersema, B. (1996). Victim costs and consequences: A new look. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
9.
Mills, L. G. (1998). Mandatory arrest and prosecution policies for domestic violence: A critical literature review and the case for more research to test victim empowerment approaches. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 306-319.
10.
Newmark, L., Liner, B., Bonderman, J., Smith, B., & the Urban Institute/SANDAG Project Team. (2001). The national evaluation of the state crime victims compensation and assistance programs: Findings and recommendations from a national survey of state administrators. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
11.
Office for Victims of Crime. (1997, February 14). Program guidelines, Victims of Crime Act FY 1997 Victim Compensation Program. The Federal Register. Retrieved December 7, 2002, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/scad/guides/vcguide.htm
12.
Office for Victims of Crime. (1999). Victims of Crime Act Crime Victims Fund. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
13.
Office for Victims of Crime. (2001). Report to the nation 2001: Fiscal years 1999 and 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
14.
Richie, B. E. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered Black women. New York: Routledge.
15.
Sarnoff, S. K. (1996). Paying for crime: The policies and possibilities of crime victim reimbursement. Westport, CT: Praeger.
16.
Straus, M. A. (1986). The cost of intrafamily assault and homicide to society. Academic Medicine, 62, 556-561.
17.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
18.
Victims of Crime Act of 1984, Pub. L. No. 98-473, 42 U.S.C. 10601 et seq. (1984).
19.
Websdale, N. (1998). Rural woman battering and the justice system: An ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
