This study compared battered women’s accounts of violence with tactics-based outcomes to assess the measurement limitations in predicting recurring violence. Accounts of 536 incidents were collected from 299 women at batterer program intake and at 3-month intervals over a 15-month follow-up. Each incident was coded using a sequential, situational model of violence, and the incident codings were summarized for each woman. The components of violent incidents did not correspond to any particular tactics-based outcomes. The female partners of men who repeatedly reassaulted them were, however, less assertive than those of non-reassaulters. A small subgroup did commit unrelenting and excessive violence across the reassault categories.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cascardi, M., & Vivian, D. (1995). Context for specific episodes of marital violence: Gender and severity of violence differences. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 265-293.
2.
Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
3.
Dobash, R. E., Dobash, R. P., Cavanagh, K., & Lewis, R . (1998). Separate and intersecting realities: A comparison of men’s and women’s accounts of violence against women. Violence Against Women, 4, 382-414.
4.
Dobash, R. E., Dobash, R. P., Cavanagh, K., & Lewis, R. (2000). Changing violent men. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Dutton, D., Bodnarchuk, M., Kropp, R., Hart, S., & Ogloff, J. (1997). Wife assault treatment and criminal recidivism: An 11-year follow-up. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 41, 9-23.
6.
Dutton, D., & Kropp, P. (2000). A review of domestic violence risk instruments. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 1, 171-181.
7.
Dutton, M. (1999). Multidimensional assessment of woman battering. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 194-199.
8.
Eisikovits, Z., Winstok, Z., & Gelles, R. (2002). Structure and dynamics of escalation from the victim’s perspective. Families in Society, 83, 142-153.
9.
Gondolf, E. (1997a). Expanding batterer program evaluations. In G. K. Kaufman & J. Jasinski (Eds.), Out of darkness: Contemporary research perspectives on family violence (pp. 208-218). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Gondolf, E. (1997b). Patterns of reassault in batterer programs. Violence and Victims, 12, 373-387.
11.
Gondolf, E. (1999). A comparison of reassault rates in four batterer programs: Do court referral, program length, and services matter? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 41-61.
12.
Gondolf, E. (2000). Human subject issues in batterer program evaluation. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 4, 273-297.
13.
Gondolf, E. (2001). Batterer intervention systems: Issues, outcomes, and recommendations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Gondolf, E. (2002). Service barriers for battered women with male partners in batterer programs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 217-227.
15.
Gondolf, E., Chang, Y., & Laporte, R. (1999). Capture-recapture analysis of batterer reassaults: An epidemiological innovation for batterer program evaluation. Violence and Victims, 14, 191-202.
16.
Gondolf, E., & White, R. (2001). Batterer program participants who repeatedly reassault: Psychopathic tendencies and other disorders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 361-380.
17.
Goodman, L., Dutton, M., & Bennett, L. (2000). Predicting repeat abuse among arrested batterers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 63-74.
18.
Hanson, R. K., & Wallace-Capretta, S. (2000). Predicting recidivism among male batterers (User Report 2000-06). Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
19.
Heckert, A., & Gondolf, E. (2001). Predicting levels of abuse and reassault among batterer program participants (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
20.
Heckert, A., & Gondolf, E. (in press). Do multiple outcomes and conditional factors improve prediction of batterer reassault. Justice Quarterly.
21.
Heckert, A., Matula, D., & Gondolf, E. (2000). Women’s accounts of domestic violence. Women and Criminal Justice, 12, 95-120.
22.
Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G., & Rice, M. (2001). Predicting violence by serious wife assaulters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 408-423.
23.
Jacobson, N. J., & Gottman, J. (1998). When men batter women: New insights into ending abusive relationships. New York: Simon & Schuster.
24.
Jones, A., & Gondolf, E. (2001). Time-varying risk factors for re-assault by batterer program participants. Journal of Family Violence, 16, 345-359.
25.
Limandri, B., & Sheridan, D. (1995). Prediction of intentional interpersonal violence. In J. Campbell (Ed.), Assessing the risk of dangerousness: Potential for further violence of sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers (pp. 1-19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Monahan, J. (1984). The prediction of violent behavior: Toward a second generation of theory and policy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 10-15.
27.
Monahan, J. (1996). Violence prediction: The past twenty and the next twenty years. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 107-119.
28.
Mulvey, E., & Lidz, C. (1993). Measuring patient violence in dangerousness research. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 277-278.
29.
Saunders, D. (1995). Prediction of wife assault. In J. Campbell (Ed.), Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers (pp. 68-95). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Smith, P., Smith, J., & Earp, J. (1999). Beyond the measurement trap: A reconstructed conceptualization and measurement of woman battering. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 177-193.
31.
Steadman, H. J. (1982). A situational approach to violence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5, 171-186.
32.
Steadman, H., Monahan, J., Appelbaum, P., Grisso, T., Mulvey, E., Roth, L., et al. (1994). Designing a new generation of risk assessment research. In J. Monahan & H. Steadman (Eds.), Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment (pp. 297-318). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Straus, M. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
34.
Straus, M. (1990). The Conflict Tactics Scales and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. In M. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 49-74). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
35.
Tolman, R. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159-177.
