Research that shows approximately equal rates of dating and domestic violence by men and women has been used to challenge the priority given to services for abused women. This article reviews the scientific evidence for gender equality in rates of lethal and nonlethal intimate partner violence. Among the problems noted in studies showing gender equality are the ways in which questions about violence are framed, exclusion of items about sexual abuse and stalking, and exclusion of separated couples. Studies without these problems show much higher rates of violence by men. Furthermore, the physical and psychological consequences of victimization are consistently more severe for women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin,126, 651-680.
2.
Arias, I., Samios, M., & O'Leary, K. D. (1987). Prevalence and correlates of physical aggression during courtship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 82-90.
3.
Bachman, R., & Carmody, D. C. (1994). Fighting fire with fire: The effects of victim resistance in intimate versus stranger perpetrated assaults against females. Journal of Family Violence, 9, 317-332.
4.
Bachman, R., & Saltzman, L. (1995). Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned National Crime Victimization Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
5.
Barnard, G. W., Vera, H., Vera, M. I., & Newman, G. (1982). 'Til death do us part: A study of spouse murder. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 10, 271-280.
6.
Barnett, O. W., & LaViolette, A. D. (1993). It could happen to anyone: Why battered women stay. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Barnett, O. W., Lee, C. Y., & Thelen, R. E. (1997). Gender differences in attributions of self-defense and control in interpartner aggression. Violence Against Women, 3, 462-481.
8.
Barnett, O. W., Martinez, T. E., & Keyson, M. (1996). The relationship between violence, social support, and self-blame in battered women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 221-233.
9.
Bartfield, J. (2000). Child support and the postdivorce economic well-being of mothers, fathers, and children. Demography, 37, 203-213.
10.
Bell, D. J. (1985, November). Domestic violence victimization: A multiyear perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Diego, CA.
11.
Berk, R. A., Berk, S., Loseke, D. R., & Rauma, D. (1983). Mutual combat and other family violence myths. In D. Finkelhor, R. Gelles, G. Hotaling, & M. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families (pp. 197-212). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
Bland, R., & Orn, H. (1986). Family violence and psychiatric disorder. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 31, 129-137.
13.
Block, C. (2000). The Chicago Women's Health Risk Study risk of serious injury or death in intimate violence: A collaborative research project. Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
14.
Block, C. R., & Christakos, A. (1995). Intimate partner homicide in Chicago over 29 years. Crime and Delinquency, 41, 496-526.
15.
Browne, A. (1986). Assault and homicide at home: When battered women kill. In M. J. Saks & L. Saxe (Eds.), Advances in applied social psychology (pp. 57-79). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Browne, A. (1987). When battered women kill. New York: Free Press.
17.
Browne, A., & Williams, K. R. (1989). Exploring the effect of resource availability and the likelihood of female-perpetrated homicides. Law & Society Review, 23, 75-94.
18.
Browne, A., Williams, K. R., & Dutton, D. G. (1999). Homicide between intimate partners: A 20-year review. In M. D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 55-78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Brush, L. D. (1990). Violent acts and injurious outcomes in married couples: Methodological issues in the National Survey of Families and Households. Gender & Society, 4, 56-67.
20.
Callahan, M. R., Tolman, R. M., & Saunders, D. G. (in press). Adolescent dating violence victimization and psychological well-being. Journal of Adolescent Research.
21.
Campbell, J. C. (1981). Misogyny and homicide of women. Advances in Nursing Science/Women's Health, 3, 67-85.
22.
Cantos, A. L., Neidig, P., & O'Leary, K. D. (1994). Injuries of women and men in a treatment program for domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 9, 113-124.
23.
Carrado, M., George, M. J., Loxam, E., Jones, L., & Templar, D. (1996). Aggression in British heterosexual relationships: A descriptive analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 401-415.
24.
Cascardi, M., Langhinrichsen, J., & Vivian, D. (1992). Marital aggression: Impact, injury, and health correlates for husbands and wives. Archives of Internal Medicine, 152, 1178-1184.
25.
Cascardi, M., & Vivian, D. (1995). Context for specific episodes of marital violence: Gender and severity of violence differences. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 265-293.
26.
Cazenave, N. A., & Zahn, M. A. (1992). Women, murder, and male domination: Police reports of domestic homicide in Chicago and Philadelphia. In E. C. Viano (Ed.), Intimate violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 83-96). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing.
27.
Chimbos, P. D. (1978). Marital violence: A study of interspousal homicide. San Francisco: R & E Associates.
28.
Dasgupta, S. D. (1999). Just like men? A critical view of violence by women. In M. F. Shepard & E. L. Pence (Eds.), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond (pp. 195-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Dasgupta, S. D. (2001). Towards an understanding of women's use of non-lethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Retrieved October 6, 2001, from http://www.vawnet.org/VNL/library/general/AR_womviol.html
30.
DeKeseredy, W. S., Saunders, D. G., Schwartz, M. D., & Alvi, S. (1997). The meanings and motives for women's use of violence in Canadian college dating relationships: Results from a national survey. Sociological Spectrum, 17, 199-222.
31.
DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1998). Measuring the extent of woman abuse in intimate heterosexual relationships: A critique of the Conflict Tactics Scales. Retrieved June 4, 2002, from http://www.vawnet.org/VNL/library/general/AR_ctscrit.html
32.
Dobash, R. P., & Dobash, R. C. (1979). Violence against wives. New York: Free Press.
33.
Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71-91.
34.
Dugan, L., Nagin, D., & Rosenfeld, R. (1999). Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: The effects of changing domesticity, women's status, and domestic violence resources. Homicide Studies, 3, 187-214.
35.
Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309-330.
36.
Farrell, W. (1999). Women can't hear what men don't say. New York: Tarcher/Putnam
37.
Feather, N. T. (1996). Domestic violence, gender and perceptions of justice. Sex Roles, 35, 507-519.
38.
Fiebert, M. S. (1996). College students' perception of men as victims of women's assaultive behavior. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 82, 49-50.
39.
Fiebert, M. S. (1997). References examining assaults by women on their spouses or male partners: An annotated bibliography. Sexuality and Culture, 1, 273-286.
40.
Fiebert, M. S. (1998). References examining assaults by women on their spouses or male partners: An annotated bibliography. Retrieved March 4, 2001, from http://www.vix.com/menmag/fiebert.htm
41.
Fiebert, M. S., & Gonzalez, D. M. (1997). Women who initiate assaults: The reasons offered for such behavior. Psychological Reports, 80, 583-590.
42.
Field, M. D., & Kirchner, R. M. (1978). Battered women are still in need: A reply to Steinmetz. Victimology, 3, 216-222.
43.
Follingstad, D. R., Wright, S., Lloyd S., & Sebastian, J. A. (1991). Sex differences in motivations and effects in dating violence. Family Relations, 40, 51-57.
44.
Foshee, V. A. (1996). Gender differences in adolescent dating abuse prevalence, types and injuries. Health Education Research, 11, 275-286.
45.
Gagne, M., & Lavoie, F. (1993). Young people's views on the causes of violence in adolescents' romantic relationships. Canada's Mental Health, 41, 11-15.
46.
Garrison, M. (1994). The economic consequences of divorce. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 32, 10-26.
47.
Gelles, R. J. (1979). The truth about abused husbands. In R. J. Gelles (Ed.), Family violence (pp. 137-144). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48.
Gelles, R. J. (1994). Research and advocacy: Can one wear two hats?Family Process, 33, 93-95.
49.
Goetting, A. (1995). Homicide in families and other special populations. New York: Springer.
50.
Gondolf, E. W. (1998). The victims of court-ordered batterers: Their victimization, helpseeking, and perceptions. Violence Against Women, 4, 659-676.
51.
Grant, C. A. (1995). Women who kill: The impact of abuse. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 16, 315-326.
52.
Greenfeld, L. A., Rand, M. R., Craven, D., Klaus, P. A., Perkins, C. A., Ringel, C., et al. (1998). Violence by intimates: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, and girlfriends. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
53.
Hamberger, L. K. (1997). Female offenders in domestic violence: A look at actions in their context. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 1, 117-129.
54.
Hamberger, L. K., & Arnold, J. (1990). The impact of mandatory arrest on domestic violence perpetrator counseling services. Family Violence Bulletin, 6, 10-12.
55.
Hamberger, L. K., Lohr, J. M., Bonge, D., & Tolin, D. F. (1997). An empirical classification of motivations for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 3, 401-423.
56.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Smutzler, N., & Sandin, E. (1997). Abrief review of the research on husband violence: Part II: The psychological effects of husband violence on battered women and their children. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2, 179-213.
57.
Hooper, M. (1996). When domestic violence diversion is no longer an option: What to do with the female offender. Berkeley Women's Law Journal, 11, 168-181.
58.
Jacobsen, N. S., Gottman, J. M., Waltz, J., Rushe, R., Bacock, J., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1994). Affect, verbal content, and psychophysiology in the arguments of couples with a violent husband. Journal of Consulting and Criminal Psychology, 62, 982-988.
59.
Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283-294.
60.
Johnson, M. P. (2001). Conflict and control: Symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. In A. Booth, A. C. Crouter, & M. Clements (Eds.), Couples in conflict (pp. 95-104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61.
Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948-963.
62.
Joseph, J. (1997). Woman battering: A comparative analysis of Black and White women. In G. Kaufman Kantor & J. Jasinski (Eds.), Out of the darkness: Contemporary perspectives on family violence (pp. 161-169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
Jurik, N. C., & Gregware, P. (1989). A method for murder: An interactionist analysis of homicides by women. Unpublished manuscript, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
64.
Jurik, N. C., & Winn, R. (1990). Gender and homicide: A comparison of men and women who kill. Violence and Victims, 5, 227-242.
65.
Kaufman Kantor, G., & Straus, M. A. (1990). Response of victims and the police to assaults on wives. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families(pp. 473-488). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
66.
Kenny, M. A. (1981). Family relationships in domestic violence disturbances. Dissertation Abstracts International, 41 (8-A). (UMI No. 3734-A)
67.
Langan, P. A., & Dawson, J. M. (1995). Spouse murder defendants in large urban counties. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
68.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Neidig, P., & Thorn, G. (1995). Violent marriages: Gender differences in levels of current violence and past abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 159-176.
69.
Lincoln Family Violence Council. (2000). Report on domestic violence for 2000. Lincoln, NE: Family Violence Council, Lincoln Medical Education Foundation.
70.
Magdol, L., Moffit, T. E., Caspi, A., Fagan, J., Newman, D. L., & Silva, P. J. (1997). Gender differences in partner violence in a birth cohort of 21-year-olds: Bridging the gap between clinical and epidemiological approaches. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 68-78.
71.
Maguigan, H. (1991). Battered women and self-defense: Myths and misconceptions in current reform proposals. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 140, 379-486.
72.
Makepeace, J. M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship violence victimization. Family Relations, 35, 383-388.
73.
Mann, C. R. (1988). Getting even?: Women who kill in domestic encounters. In S. L. Johann & F. Osanka (Eds.), Representing battered women who kill (pp. 8-26). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
74.
Mann, C. R. (1992). Female murderers and their motives: A tale of two cities. In E. Viano (Ed.), Intimate violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 73-81). New York: Hemisphere.
75.
Martin, M. E. (1997). Double your trouble: Dual arrest in family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 139-157.
76.
Matthews, W. J. (1984). Violence in college couples. College Student Journal, 18, 150-158.
77.
McFarlane, J., Willson, P., Malecha, A., & Lemmey, D. (2000). Intimate partner violence: A gender comparison. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 158-169.
78.
McLeod, M. (1984). Women against men: An examination of domestic violence based on an analysis of official data and national victimization data. Justice Quarterly, 1, 171-193.
79.
McNeely, R. L., & Robinson-Simpson, G. (1987). The truth about domestic violence: A falsely framed issue. Social Work, 32, 485-490.
80.
Men's Defense Association. (2001). Mission statement. Retrieved April 11, 2001, from http://www.mensdefense.org/
81.
Mihalic, S. W., & Elliot, D. (1997). Asocial learning theory model of marital violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 21-47.
82.
Miller, S. L. (2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence: Criminal justice professionals and service providers respond. Violence Against Women, 7, 1339-1376.
83.
Molidor, C., & Tolman, R. M. (1998). Gender and contextual factors in adolescent dating violence. Violence Against Women, 4, 180-194.
84.
Morse, B. J. (1995). Beyond the Conflict Tactics Scale: Assessing gender differences in partner violence. Violence and Victims, 10, 251-272.
85.
National Clearinghouse for the Defense of Battered Women. (2001, February). The impact of arrests and convictions on battered women. Unpublished document. Philadelphia, PA: National Clearinghouse for the Defense of Battered Women.
86.
Nazroo, J. (1995). Uncovering gender differences in the use of marital violence: The effect of methodology. Sociology, 29, 475-495.
87.
O'Keefe, M., & Treister. L. (1998). Victims of dating violence among high school students: Are the predictors different for males and females?Violence Against Women, 4, 195-223.
88.
O'Leary, K. D. (1999). Psychological abuse: A variable deserving critical attention in domestic violence. Violence and Victims, 14, 1-14.
89.
Pagelow, M. D. (1984).The ’battered husband syndrome’: Social problem or much ado about little?Sociological Review Monograph, 31, 173-195.
90.
Pleck, E., Pleck, J. H., Grossman, M., & Bart, P. B. (1977-1978). The battered data syndrome: A comment on Steinmetz's article. Victimology: An International Journal, 2, 680-683.
91.
Renzetti, C. (1999). The challenge to feminism posed by women's use of violence in intimate relationships. In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 42-56). New York: New York University Press.
92.
Rhodes, N. R., & McKenzie, E. B. (1998). Why do battered women stay? Three decades of research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3, 391-406.
93.
Saenger, G. (1963). Male and female relations in the American comic strip. In D. M. White & R. H. Abel (Eds.), The funnies, an American idiom (pp. 219-231). Glencoe, NY: The Free Press.
94.
Saunders, D. G. (1980). The police response to battered women: Predictors of officers' use of arrest, counseling, and minimal action. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1979). Dissertation Abstracts International, Publication No. 80-08840.
95.
Saunders, D. G. (1986). When battered women use violence: Husband abuse or self-defense?Violence and Victims, 1, 47-60.
96.
Saunders, D. G. (1988). Other ‘truths’ about domestic violence: A reply to McNeely and Robinson-Simpson. Social Work, 33, 179-183.
97.
Saunders, D. G. (1989, November). Who hits first and who hurts most? Evidence for the greater victimization of women in intimate relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Reno, Nevada.
98.
Saunders, D. G. (1995). The tendency to arrest victims of domestic violence: A preliminary analysis of officer characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 147-158.
99.
Saunders, D. G., & Browne, A. (2000). Intimate partner homicide. In R. T. Ammerman & M. Hersen (Eds.), Case studies in family violence (2nd ed., pp. 415-449). New York: Plenum.
100.
Schneider, E. M., & Jordan, S. B. (1978). Representation of women who defend themselves in response to physical or sexual assault. Family Law Review, 1, 118-132.
101.
Schwartz, M. (1987). Gender and injury in spousal assault. Sociological Focus, 20, 61-75.
102.
Skilken, C. B., & McKenny, P. C. (1996). Implications of feminist scholarship for the study of women's postdivorce economic disadvantage. Family Relations, 45, 91-97.
103.
Sorenson, S. B., & Telles, C. A. (1991). Self reports of spousal violence in a Mexican-American and non-Hispanic White population. Violence and Victims, 6, 3-15.
104.
Statistics Canada. (2001). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile. Ottawa, Canada: National Clearinghouse on Family Violence.
105.
Steinmetz, S. K. (1977-1978). The battered husband syndrome. Victimology: An International Journal, 2, 499-509.
106.
Stets, J. E., & Henderson, D. A. (1991). Contextual factors surrounding conflict resolution while dating: Results from a national study. Family Relations, 40, 29-40.
107.
Stets, J. E., & Straus, M. A. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families(pp. 151-166). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
108.
Stout, K. D. (1989). Intimate femicide: Effects of legislation and social services. Affilia, 4, 21-27.
109.
Stout, K. D. (1993). Intimate femicide: A study of men who have killed their mates. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 19, 81-94.
110.
Stout, K. D., & Brown, P. (1995). Legal and social differences between men and women who kill intimate partners. Affilia, 10, 194-205.
111.
Straus, M. A. (1976). Sexual inequality, cultural norms, and wife-beating. Victimology: An International Journal, 1, 54-76.
112.
Straus, M. A. (1980). Victims and aggressors in marital violence. American Behavioral Scientist, 23, 681-704.
113.
Straus, M. A. (1990a). The Conflict Tactics Scales and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. In M. A. Straus & R.J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American Families (pp. 49-74). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
114.
Straus, M. A. (1990b). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. In M. A. Straus & R.J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American Families(pp. 29-48). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
115.
Straus, M. A. (1993). Physical assaults by wives: A major social problem. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 67-87). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
116.
Straus, M. A. (1995). Trends in cultural norms and rates of partner violence: An update to 1992. In S. M. Stich & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Understanding partner violence: Prevalence, causes, consequences, and solutions (pp. 30-33). Minneapolis, MN: National Council on Family Relations.
117.
Straus, M. A. (1997). Physical assaults by women partners: A major social problem. In M. R. Walsh (Ed.), Women, men and gender: Ongoing debates (pp. 210-221). New Haven: Yale University Press.
118.
Straus, M. A. (1999). The controversy over domestic violence by women: A methodological, theoretical, and sociology of science analysis. In X. B. Arriaga & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Violence in intimate relationships (pp. 17-44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
119.
Straus, M.A. & Gelles, R.J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 465-479.
120.
Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (Eds.) (1990). Physical violence in American families. New York: Transaction.
121.
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1981). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
122.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
123.
Straus, M. A., & Kaufman Kantor, G. (1994, July). Change in spouse abuse rates from 1975-1992: A comparison of three national surveys in the United States. Paper presented at the Thirteenth World Congress of Sociology, Bielefeld, Germany.
124.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
125.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
126.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2001). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142-161.
127.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1980). Intimate victims: A study of violence among friends and relatives. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
128.
Vanfossen, B.E. (1979). Intersexual violence in Monroe County, New York. Victimology: An International Journal, 4, 299-304.
129.
Vivian, D., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1994). Are bi-directionally violent couples mutually victimized? A gender-sensitive comparison. Violence and Victims, 9, 107-124.
130.
Walker, L. E. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.
131.
Wilson, M. I., & Daly, M. (1992). Who kills whom in spouse killings? On the exceptional sex ratio of spousal homicides in the United States. Criminology, 30, 189-215.
132.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1993). Spousal homicide risk and estrangement. Violence and Victims, 8, 3-17.
133.
Wilson, M., Daly, M., & Daniele, A. (1995). Familicide: The killing of spouse and children. Aggressive Behavior, 21, 275-291.
134.
Wilson, K., Vercella, R., Brems, C., Benning, D., & Refro, D. (1992). Levels of learned helplessness in abused women. Women & Therapy, 13, 53-67.
135.
Wolfgang, M. E. (1958). Patterns in criminal homicide. New York: Wiley.
136.
Wolfgang, M. E. (1967). A sociological analysis of criminal homicide. In M. E. Wolfgang (Ed.), Studies in homicide (pp. 15-28). New York: Harper & Row.
