Prevalence estimates play a role in academic and policy analyses of violence against women. The debate on available figures and what they measure has tended toward overgeneralization with too little consideration of differences that might emerge from cross-national or cross-cultural comparison. The present review introduces 11 prevalence studies carried out between 1986 and 1997 in nine European countries, their research goals and methodology, and some salient figures. With a growing understanding of the need for sensitive research and clear definitions, there is regrettable lack of interchange within Europe, impeding comparative analysis. Issues for future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-702.
2.
Benard, C. , Schlaffer, E., Mühlbach, B., & Sapik, G. (1991). Gewalt in der familie: Teil I: Gewalt gegen frauen [Violence in the family: Part I: Violence against women]. Vienna: Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Jugend und Familie.
3.
Campbell, J. C. (2000). Promise and perils of surveillance in addressing violence against women. Violence Against Women, 6, 705-727.
4.
Christiansen, E. , & Koch-Nielsen, I. (1992). Vold ude og hjemme [Violence against women]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Socialforskningsinstituttet.
5.
DeKeseredy, W. S. (2000). Current controversies on defining nonlethal violence against women in intimate heterosexual relationships: Empirical implications. Violence Against Women, 6, 728-746.
6.
Dobash, R. E. , & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives. New York: Free Press.
7.
Dobash, R. E. , & Dobash, R. P. (Eds.). (1998). Rethinking violence against women. London: Sage.
8.
Dobash, R. P. , Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71-91.
9.
Dóms- og kirkjumálaráduneytid . (1997). Skýrsla, dómsmálarádherra um orsakir, umfang og afleidingar heimilisofbeldis og annars ofbeldis gegn konum og börnum. Reykjavik, Iceland: Author.
10.
Eliasson, M. (1999). Mäns våld mot kvinnor: Misshandel, våldtäkt, dominans, kontroll [Men's violence against women: Abuse, rape, dominance, control]. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
11.
European Women's Lobby . (1999, March). Study: Unveiling the hidden data on domestic violence in the EU. Report presented to the German presidency/European Commission Conference on Domestic Violence Cologne.
12.
Gelles, R. J. , & Loseke, D. R. (1993). Current controversies on family violence. London: Sage.
13.
Gilligan, J. (1996). Violence: Reflections on a national epidemic. New York: Vintage.
14.
Gillioz, L. (1997). Domination and violence against women within the couple. In European strategies to combat violence against women [Report of the first technical meeting]. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
15.
Gillioz, L. , de Puy, J., & Ducret, V. (1997). Domination et violence envers la femme dans le couple [Domination and violence toward women within the couple]. Lausanne, Switzerland: Editions Payot.
16.
Gislason, I. A. (1997, July). Violence against women in Iceland. Paper presented at the Dublin Workshop of the Network “Gender Inequality in the European Regions,”Dublin, Ireland.
17.
Gordon, M. (2000). Definitional issues in violence against women: Surveillance and research from a violence research perspective. Violence Against Women, 6, 747-783.
18.
Group of Specialists for Combating Violence Against Women . (1997). Final report of activities of the EG-S-VL including a plan of action for combating violence against women. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
19.
Hagemann-White, C. (1992). Strategien gegen Gewalt im Geschlechterverhältnis [Strategies against violence in gender relations]. Pfaffenweiler, Germany: Centaurus.
20.
Hagemann-White, C. (1998). Violence without end? Some reflections on achievements, contradictions, and perspectives of the feminist movement in Germany. In R.C.A. Klein (Ed.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on family violence (pp. 176-191). London: Routledge.
21.
Hagemann-White, C. (2000). Male violence and control: Constructing a comparative European perspective. In S. S. Duncan & B. Pfau-Effinger (Eds.), Gender, work and culture in the EU. London: UCL/Routledge.
22.
Hagemann-White, C. , Kavemann, B., Kootz, J., Weinmann, U., Wildt, C. C., Burgard, R., & Scheu, U. (1981). Hilfen für miβhandelte frauen [Support services for battered women]. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.
23.
Hanmer, J. (1996). Women and violence: Commonalities and diversities. In B. Fawcett, B. Featherstone, J. Hearn, & C. Toft (Eds.), Violence and gender relations: Theories and interventions (pp. 7-21). London: Sage.
24.
Hearn, J. (1998). The violences of men: How men talk about and how agencies respond to men's violence to women. London: Sage.
25.
Heiskanen, M. , & Piispa, M. (1998). Faith, hope, battering: A survey of men's violence against women in Finland. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
26.
Hester, M. , Kelly, L., & Radford, J. (Eds.). (1996). Women, violence and male power: Feminist activism, research and practice. Buckingham, England: Open University.
27.
Johnson, H. (1996). Dangerous domains: Violence against women in Canada. Scarborough: Nelson Canada.
28.
Johnson, M.P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283-294.
29.
Kaplan, G. (1992). Contemporary Western European feminism. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
30.
Kelleher and Associates (with O'Connor, M.). (1995). Making the links. Toward an integrated strategy for the elimination of violence against women in intimate relationships with men. Dublin, Ireland: Women's Aid.
31.
Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
Klein, R.C.A. (Ed.). (1998). Multidisciplinary perspectives on family violence. London: Routledge.
33.
Koss, M. P. (1992). The underdetection of rape: Methodological choices influence incidence estimates. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 61-75.
34.
Krahé, B. , Scheinberger-Olwig, R., & Waizenhöfer, E. (1999). Sexuelle aggression zwischen jugendlichen: Eine prävalenzerhebung mit Ost-West vergleich [Sexual aggression between young people: A prevalence study with East-West comparison]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 30, 165-178.
35.
Lourenco, N. , Lisboa, M., & Pais, E. (1997). Violência contra as mulheres [Violence against women]. Cedernos Condicão Feminina 48. Lisboa, Portugal: Comissão para a igualdade e para os direitos das mulheres.
36.
Lundgren, E. (1995). Feminist theory and violent empiricism. London: Avebury.
37.
Lundgren, E. (2000). Report on Swedish survey at the annual meeting of the European Research Network on Conflict, Gender, and Violence (September 6-10), Sunderland, England.
38.
Mirrlees-Black, C. (1999). Domestic violence: Findings from a new British Crime Survey self-completion questionnaire. London: Home Office.
39.
Nazroo, J. (1995). Uncovering gender differences in the use of marital violence: The effect of methodology. Sociology, 29, 475-494.
40.
Römkens, R. (1997). Prevalence of wife abuse in the Netherlands: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in survey research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 99-125.
41.
Römkens, R. G. (1992). Gewoon geweld? Omvang, aard, gevolgen en achtergronden van gewald tegen vrouwen in heteroseksueelle relaties [Ordinary violence? Extent, kinds, consequences and background of violence against women in heterosexual relationships]. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
42.
Schröttle, M. (1999). Politik und gewalt im geschlechterverhältnis: Eine empirische untersuchung über ausmaβ, ursachen und hintergründe von gewalt gegen frauen in ostdeutschen paarbeziehungen vor und nach der deutsch-deutschen vereinigung [Politics and gender violence, an empirical study of the extent, causes and background of violence against women among East German couples before and after German unification]. Bielefeld, Germany: Kleine.
43.
Schwartz, M.D. (2000). Methodological issues in the use of survey data for measuring and characterizing violence against women. Violence Against Women, 6, 815-838.
44.
Stolk, B. van , & Wouters, C. (1987). Frauen im Zwiespalt: Beziehungsprobleme im Wohlfahrtsstaat. [Women in ambivalence: Relationship problems in the welfare state]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
45.
Straus, M. A. (1990). Injury and frequency of assault and the “representative sample fallacy” in measuring wife beating and child abuse. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 75-91). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
46.
Straus, M. A. (1991). New theory and old canards about family violence research. Social Problems, 38, 180-197.
47.
Walby, S. , & Myhill, A. (in press). New survey methodologies in researching violence against women. British Journal of Criminology.
48.
Wetzels, P. (1996). Kriminalität und Opfererleben: Immer öfter immer das Gleiche? [Crime and experience of victimization: Increasingly always the same?]. Monatszeitschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 79, 1-24.
49.
Wetzels, P. , Greve, W., Mecklenburg, E., Bilsky, W., & Pfeiffer, C. (1995). Kriminalität im leben alter menschen: Eine altersvergleichende Untersuchung von Opfererfahrungen, persönlichem Sicherheitsgefühl und Kriminalitätsfurcht [Crime in the life of older people: An age-group comparative study of victimization, feelings of personal safety and fear of crime]. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.
