Traditionally, even when the police have arrested suspected spouse abusers, prosecutors have been reluctant to follow through with prosecution. Using a sample of 424 cases in which abusers were either arrested on the scene or issued citations for court appearance, this research study investigates whether characteristics surrounding the offense (such as cause of the argument and victim injury), offender characteristics (such as prior record and substance abuse), or victim characteristics (such as relationship with the offender and substance abuse) most impact the prosecution's decision to prosecute. The policy implications of the findings are also discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berk, R. A. , Campbell, A., Klap, R., & Western, B. (1992). A Bayesian analysis of the Colorado Springs spouse abuse experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83(1), 170-200.
2.
Binder, A. , & Meeker, J. W. (1988). Experiments as reforms. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 347-358.
3.
Bowman, C. G. (1992). The arrest experiments: A feminist critique. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83(1), 201-208.
4.
Buzawa, E. S. , & Buzawa, C. G. (1996). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Cahn, N.R.A. , & Lerman, L. G. (1991). Prosecuting woman abuse. In M. Steinman (Ed.), Woman battering: Policy responses (pp. 95-112). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
6.
Corsilles, A. (1994). No-drop policies in the prosecution of domestic violence cases: Guarantee to action or dangerous solution?Fordham Law Review, 63, 853-881.
7.
Dunford, F. W. (1990). System initiated warrants for suspects of misdemeanor domestic assault: A pilot study. Justice Quarterly, 7, 631-653.
8.
Dunford, F. W. , Huizinga, D., & Elliot, D. S. (1989). The Omaha domestic violence police experiment. Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
9.
Dunford, F. W. , Huizinga, D., & Elliot, D. S. (1990). The role of arrest in domestic assault: The Omaha police experiment. Criminology, 28, 183-206.
10.
Elliot, D. S. (1989). Criminal justice procedures in family violence crimes. In L. Ahlen & M. Tonry (Eds.), Family violence (pp. 427-480). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Ford, D. A. (1991). Prosecution as a victim power resource: A note on empowering women in violent conjugal relationships. Law and Society Review, 25, 313-334.
12.
Ford, D. A. (1993). The Indianapolis domestic violence prosecution experiment. Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
13.
Ford, D. A. , & Regoli, M. J. (1993). The criminal prosecution of wife assaulters: Problems and effects. In N. Z. Hilton (Ed.), Legal responses to wife assault (pp. 127-164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Frisch, L. A. (1992). Research that succeeds, policies that fail. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83(1), 209-216.
15.
Garner, J. , Fagan, J., & Maxwell, C. (1995). Published findings from the spouse assault replication program: A critical review. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11, 3-28.
16.
Hirschel, J. D. , & Hutchison, I. W. (1992). Female spouse abuse and the police response: The Charlotte, North Carolina Experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83(1), 73-119.
17.
Hirschel, J. D. & Hutchison, I. W. (1996). Realities and implications of the Charlotte experiment. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 54-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Hirschel, J. D. , Hutchison, I. W., & Dean, C. W. (1992). The failure of arrest to deter spouse abuse. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29(1), 7-33.
19.
Hirschel, J. D. , Hutchison, I. W., Dean, C. W., Kelley, J. J., & Pesackis, C. E. (1991). Charlotte spouse assault replication project. Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
20.
Lempert, R. (1989). Humility is a virtue: On the publicization of policy relevant research. Law and Society Review, 23, 145-161.
21.
Lerman, L. G. (1981). Prosecution of spouse abuse innovations in criminal justice response. Washington, DC: Center for Women's Policy Studies.
22.
Lerman, L. G. (1992). The decontextualization of domestic violence. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83(1), 217-240.
23.
Martin, M. E. (1994). Mandatory arrest for domestic violence: The courts' response. Criminal Justice Review, 19, 212-227.
24.
McCord, J. (1992). Deterrence of domestic violence: A critical view of research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29(2), 229-239.
25.
Mitchell, D. B. (1992). Contemporary police practices in domestic violence cases: Arresting the abuser: Is it enough?Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83(1), 241-249.
26.
Pate, A. M. , & Hamilton, E. E. (1992). Formal and informal deterrents to domestic violence: The Dade County spouse assault experiment. American Sociological Review, 57, 691-707.
27.
Pate, A. M. , Hamilton, E. E., & Annan, S. (1992). Metro-Dade spouse abuse replication project technical report. Washington, DC: The Police Foundation.
28.
Rauma, D. (1984). Going for the gold: Prosecutorial decision making in cases of wife assault. Social Science Research, 13, 321-351.
29.
Schmidt, J. , & Steury, E. H. (1989). Prosecutorial discretion in filing charges in domestic violence cases. Criminology, 27, 487-510.
30.
Sherman, L. W. , & Berk, R. A. (1984a). The Minneapolis domestic violence experiment. Washington, DC: The Police Foundation.
31.
Sherman, L. W. , & Berk, R. A. (1984b). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.
32.
Sherman, L. W. , & Cohn, E. G. (1986). The impact of research on legal policy: The Minneapolis domestic violence experiment. Law and Society Review, 23, 117-144.
33.
Sherman, L. W. , Schmidt, J. D., Rogan, D. P., Gartin, P. R., Cohn, E. G., Collins, D., & Bacich, R. (1991). From initial deterrence to long term escalation: Short custody arrest for poverty ghetto domestic violence. Criminology, 29, 821-850.
34.
Sherman, L. W. , Schmidt, J. D., Rogan, D. P., Smith, D. A., Gartin, P. R., Cohn, E. G., Collins, D., & Bacich, R. (1992). The variable effects of arrest on criminal careers: The Milwaukee domestic violence experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83(1), 137-169.
35.
Zorza, J. (1992). The criminal law of misdemeanor domestic violence, 1970-1990. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83(1), 46-72.
