The phenomenon of understanding lies at the heart of the qualitative inquiry enterprise. Drawing on the tradition of philosophical hermeneutics, this article discusses the following four conditions under which understanding unfolds: (a) the difference between knowing and understanding; (b) understanding as learning rather than reading; (c) understanding as relational and hence requiring openness, dialogue, and listening; and (d) understanding as entailing the possibility for misunderstanding. The article closes with some brief comments on the implications of this investigation for what it means to be a qualitative inquirer.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Code, L. (1983). Responsibility and the epistemic community: Woman’s place. Social Research, 50(3), 537-555.
2.
Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Dunne, J. (1993). Back to the rough ground: “Phronesis” and “Techne” in modern philosophy and in Aristotle. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
4.
Gadamer, H-G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed., J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, trans.). New York: Crossroad.
5.
Gadamer, H-G. (1997). Reflections on my philosophical journey. In L. E. Hahn (Ed.), The philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer (pp. 3-63). Chicago: Open Court.
6.
Gallagher, S. (1992). Hermeneutics and education. Albany, NY: Russell Sage.
7.
Geertz, C. (1983). Blurred genres: The refiguration of social thought. In C. Geertz (Ed.), Local knowledge (pp. 19-35). New York: Basic Books.
8.
Gergen, K. (1988). If persons are texts. In S. B. Messer, L. A. Sass, & R. L. Woolfolk (Eds.), Hermeneutics and psychological theory (pp. 28-51). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
9.
Grondin, J. (1994). Introduction to philosophical hermeneutics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Guignon, C. B. (1991). Pragmatism or hermeneutics: Epistemology after foundationalism. In D. R. Hiley, J. F. Bohman, & R. Shusterman (Eds.), The interpretive turn (pp. 81-101). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11.
Kerdeman, D. (1998). Hermeneutics and education: Understanding, control, and agency. Educational Theory, 48(2), 241-266.
12.
Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative or interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 275-289.
13.
Molander, B. (1990). Socratic dialogue: On dialogue and discussion in the formation of knowledge. In B. Göranzon & M. Florin (Eds.), Artificial intelligence, culture and language: On education and work (pp. 229-243). London: Springer-Verlag.
14.
Ricoeur, P. (1981). The model of the text: Meaningful action considered as text. In J. B. Thompson (Ed. and Trans.), Hermeneutics and the human sciences (pp. 197-220). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Schwandt, T. A. (1996). Farewell to criteriology. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(1), 59-73.
16.
Schwandt, T. A. (in press). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Sokolowski, R. (1997). Gadamer’s theory of hermeneutics. In L. E. Hahn (Ed.), The philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer (pp. 223-234). Chicago: Open Court.
19.
Straw, S. B., & Sadowy, P. (1990). Dynamics of communication: Transmission, translation and interaction in reading comprehension. In D. Bogdan & S. B. Straw (Eds.), Beyond communication: Reading comprehension and criticism (pp. 21-47). Portsmouth, UK: Boynton/Cook.
20.
Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the human sciences. Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Taylor, C. (1988). Wittgenstein, empiricism, and the question of the “inner”: Commentary on Kenneth Gergen. In S. B. Messer, L. A. Sass, & R. L. Woolfolk (Eds.), Hermeneutics and psychological theory (pp. 52-58). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
