The author first used life history as a research method in her master of education thesis at a Canadian university. She now believes that the issues and questions that arose from that experience were mired in a critical perspective that reflected realist assumptions. Increasing dissatisfaction with her efforts to work through the life history data gathered in 1995 has led her to problematize the methodological implications of studying research participants’ lives this way. Main points discussed include questions and issues with voice and collaborative methodologies, the epistemological assumptions that frame life history research, and a discussion of victory narratives within the redemptive culture of the human and social sciences. And, just what do we do with “unexpected stories”?
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barone, T. (1995). Persuasive writings, vigilant readings, and reconstructed characters: The paradox of trust in educational storysharing. In J. A. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 63-74). Washington, DC: Falmer.
2.
Blumenfeld-Jones, D. (1995). Fidelity as a criterion for practicing and evaluating narrative inquiry. In J. A. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 25-36). Washington, DC: Falmer.
3.
Eisenhart, M. (1995). The fax, the jazz player, and the self-story teller: How do people organize culture?Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26(1), 3-26.
4.
Emihovich, C. (1995). Distancing passion: Narratives in social science. In J. A. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 37-48). Washington, DC: Falmer.
5.
Ferguson, A. (1996). Can I choose who I am? And how would that empower me? Gender, race, identities and the self. In A. Garry & M. Pearsall (Eds.), Women, explorations in feminist philosophy knowledge, and reality (pp. 108-126). New York: Routledge.
6.
Foucault, M. (1980). The history of sexuality, Volume 1. New York: Vintage.
7.
Goodson, I. F. (1995). The story so far: Personal knowledge and the political. In A. J. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 89-98). Washington, DC: Falmer.
8.
Goodson, I. F. (1998). Storying the self: Life politics and the study of the teacher’s life and work. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum: Towards new identities (pp. 3-20). New York: Garland.
9.
Greene, M. (1994). Epistemology and educational research: The influence of recent approaches to knowledge. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 423-464). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
10.
Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Hatch, A. J., & Wisniewski, R. (1995). Life history and narrative: Questions, issues and exemplary works. In J. A. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 113-136). Washington, DC: Falmer.
12.
hooks, b. (1996). Choosing the margin as a space of radical openness. In A. Garry & M. Pearsall (Eds.), Women, explorations in feminist philosophy knowledge, and reality (pp. 48-55). New York: Routledge.
13.
Hwu, W-S. (1998). Curriculum, transcendence, and Zen/Taoism: Critical ontology of the self. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum: Towards new identities (pp. 21-40). New York: Garland.
14.
Kaplan, C. (1996). Questions of travel: Postmodern discourses of displacement. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
15.
Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 257-277.
16.
Lather, P. (1996). Troubling clarity: The politics of accessible language. Harvard Educational Review, 66(3), 525-545.
17.
Lather, P. (1998, March). Against empathy, voice and authenticity. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, San Diego, CA.
18.
Lather, P., & Smithies, C. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS. Boulder, CO: Westview/HarperCollins.
19.
Lincoln, Y. (1998). From understanding to action: New imperatives, new criteria, new methods for interpretive researchers. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26(1), 12-29.
20.
Luke, C. (1996). Feminist pedagogy theory: Reflections on power and authority. Educational Theory, 46(3), 283-302.
21.
Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M.M.J. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Nespor, J., & Barber, L. (1995). Politics of narrative. In J. A. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 49-62). Washington, DC: Falmer.
23.
Pinar, W. F. (Ed.). (1998). Curriculum: Toward new identities. New York: Garland.
24.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. In J. A. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 5-24). Washington, DC: Falmer.
25.
Popkewitz, T. S. (1998). The culture of redemption and the administration of freedom as research. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 1-34.
26.
Serres, M. (1995). Angels: A modern myth (F. Cowper, Trans.). New York: Flammarion.
27.
Serres, M. with B. Latour. (1995). Conversations on science, culture and time. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
28.
Smith, J. K. (1993). After the demise of empiricism: The problem of judging social and educational inquiry. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
29.
Sullivan, P. A. (1996). Ethnography and the problem of the “other.” In P. Mortenson & G. E. Kirsch (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative studies of literacy (pp. 97-114). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
30.
Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Visweswaran, K. (1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
