It is neither appropriate nor ethical to work with life histories in a way that writes the storytellers out of their own lives or that presents their words as an unexpurgated truth. The zoom framework encourages the examination of life histories from different perspectives, recognizing that no one perspective alone can reveal their full complexity. The macro-zoom focuses on the sociohistorical dimension, exploring collective meanings as they relate to individual experience. The meso-zoom reveals the personal level of values, interpretations and positioning. The micro-zoom focuses on the subtleties of the telling, examining emotions and voice, whereas the interactional-zoom recognizes life histories as a product of the relationship between narrator and researcher. By zooming in on each of the multiple perspectives, differing, complementary, and even contradictory data emerges. Most important, this model allows the researcher to acknowledge and productively hold in tension both the individual and collective meanings within life histories.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, K., & Jack, D. (1991). Learning to listen: Interview techniques and analysis. In S. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women’s words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 11-26). New York: Routledge.
2.
Barry, K. (1989). Biography and the search for women’s subjectivity. Women’s Studies International Forum, 12(6), 561-577.
3.
Bodnar, J. (1996). Generational memory in an American town. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, XXVI(4), 619-637.
4.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Chanfrault-Duchet, M. (1991). Narrative structures, social models and symbolic representation in the life story. In S. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women’s words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 77-92). New York: Routledge.
6.
Chaplin, E. (1994). Sociology and visual representation. London: Routledge.
7.
Davis, K. (1994). What’s in a voice? Methods and metaphors. Feminism and Psychology, 4(3), 353-361.
8.
Devault, M. (1990). Talking and listening from women’s standpoint: Feminist strategies for interviewing and analysis. Social Problems, 37(1), 99-118.
9.
Deveraux, L. (1995) Experience, re-presentation, and film. In L. Deveraux & R. Hillman (Eds.), Fields of vision: Essays in film studies, visual anthropology, and photography (pp. 56-73). Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
Duruz, J. (1994). Suburban houses revisited. In K. Darian-Smith & P. Hamilton (Eds.), Memory and history in twentieth century Australia (pp. 174-191). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
Ellis, C., & Flaherty, M. (1992). Investigative subjectivity: Research on lived experience. London: Sage.
12.
Etter-Lewis, G. (1991). Black women’s life stories: Reclaiming self in narrative texts. In S. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women’s words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 43-58). New York: Routledge.
13.
Flax, J. (1990). Thinking fragments: Psychoanalysis, feminism and postmodernism in the contemporary West. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
Gergen, M., & Gergen, K. (1993). Narratives of the gendered body in popular autobiography. In R. Josselson & A. Lieblich (Eds.), The narrative study of lives (Vol. 1, pp. 191-218). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Hennessy, R. (1993). Materialist feminism and the politics of discourse. New York: Routledge.
16.
Holbrook, A. (1995). Methodological developments in oral history: A multi-layered approach. Australian Education Researcher, 22(3), 21-44.
17.
Kehily, M. (1995). Self-narration, autobiography and identity construction. Gender & Education, 7(1), 23-31.
18.
Ochberg, R. (1994). Life stories and storied lives. In A. Lieblich & R. Josselson (Eds.), Exploring identity and gender: The narrative study of lives (Vol. 2, pp. 113-144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Okely, J. (1992). Anthropology and autobiography: Participatory experience and embodied knowledge. In J. Okely & H. Callaway (Eds.), Anthropology and autobiography (pp. 1-28). London: Routledge.
20.
Opie, A. (1990). Qualitative research, appropriation of the “other” and empowerment. Feminist Review, 40, 53-69.
21.
Passerini, L. (1989). Women’s personal narratives: Myths, experiences and emotions. In Personal Narratives Group (Ed.), Interpreting women’s lives: Feminist theory and personal narratives (pp. 189-198). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
22.
Poland, B., & Pederson, A. (1998). Reading between the lines: Interpreting silences in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(2), 293-312.
23.
Portelli, A. (1991). The death of Luigi Trastulli and other stories. Albany: State University of New York Press.
24.
Ribbens, J. (1989). Interviewing—An unnatural situation?Women’s Studies International Forum, 12(6), 579-592.
25.
Rosenthal, G. (1993). Reconstruction of life stories: Principles of selection in generating stories for narrative biographical interviews. In R. Josselson & A. Lieblich (Eds.), The narrative study of lives (Vol. 1, pp. 59-91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
Samuel, R., & Thompson, P. (1990). The myths we live by. London: Routledge.
27.
Stewart, A. (1994). The women’s movement and women’s lives: Linking individual development and social events. In A. Lieblich & R. Josselson (Eds.), Exploring identity and gender: The narrative study of lives (Vol. 2, pp. 230-250). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Tierney, W. (1998). Life history’s history: Subjects foretold. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(1), 49-70.
29.
White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: WW Norton.
