After embarking on a research project, the author realized that her midlife experience would influence the way in which she interpreted her fieldwork with midlife women. However, the author was not prepared for the ambivalence, contradiction, and discomfort that she experienced in response to doing this research project. It was only when she discovered the concept of reflexivity, which enabled her to articulate the liminality of her position, that she came to understand that such feelings were critical elements of the research process. In this article, the author illustrates the ways in which interpretation and representation of ethnographic meaning emerge from the researcher’s position as a deliberate, self-reflexive participant observer.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, P., & Adler, P. (1990). The past and future of ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 16(1), 4-24.
2.
Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 248-261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Banister, E. M., & Peavy, R. V. (1994). The erosion of self: An ethnographic study of women’s experience of marriage to alcoholic husbands. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 28(3), 206-221.
4.
Bogdewic, S. P. (1992). Participant observation. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 45-63). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Bruner, E. M. (1986). Experience and its expressions. In V. W. Turner & E. M. Bruner (Eds.), Anthropology of experience (pp. 3-32). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
6.
Callaway, H. (1992). Ethnography and experience: Gender implications in fieldwork and texts. In J. Okely & H. Callaway (Eds.), Anthropology and autobiography (pp. 29-49). New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall.
7.
Conguergood, D. (1991). Rethinking ethnography: Towards a critical cultural politics. Communication Monographs, 58, 179-194.
8.
Cottle, T. J. (1977). Private lives and public accounts. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
9.
Cox, L. M., & Lyddon, W. J. (1997). Constructivist conceptions of self: A discussion of emerging identity constructs. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 10, 201-219.
10.
Daniluk, J. C. (1993). The meaning and experience of female sexuality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17(1), 53-69.
11.
Denzin, N. K. (1996). The epistemological crisis in the human disciplines: Letting the old do the work of the new. In R. Jessor, A. Colby, & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 127-152). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
DeVault, M. (1990). Talking and listening from women’s standpoint: Feminist strategies for interviewing and analysis. Social Problems, 37, 96-116.
13.
Dickson, G. L. (1990). A feminist poststructuralist analysis of the knowledge of menopause. Advances in Nursing Science, 12(3), 15-31.
14.
Eastland, L. S. (1993). The dialectical nature of ethnography: Liminality, reflexivity, and understanding. In S. L. Herndon & G. L. Kreps (Eds.), Qualitative research: Application in organizational research (pp. 121-138). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
15.
Geertz, C. (1988). Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine.
18.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Tavistock.
19.
Harding, S. (1987). Feminism and methodology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
20.
Henderson, D. J. (1995). Consciousness raising in participatory research: Method and methodology for emancipatory nursing inquiry. Advances in Nursing Science, 17(3), 58-69.
21.
Hertz, R. (1997). Introduction: Reflexivity and voice. In R. Hertz (Ed.), Reflexivity & voice (pp. vii-xviii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Kleinman, S., & Copp, M. A. (1993). Emotions and fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
Myerhoff, B., & Ruby, J. (1992). Introduction. In J. Ruby (Ed.), A crack in the mirror: Reflexive perspectives in anthropology (pp. 1-35). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
24.
Polkinghorn, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. New York: State University of New York Press.
25.
Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
26.
Ricoeur, P. (1977). The model of the text: Meaningful action considered as text. In F. Dallmayr & T. McCarthy (Eds.), Understanding and social inquiry (pp. 316-334). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
27.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Wilson.
28.
Turner, V. (1974). Dramas, fields, & metaphors: Symbolic action in human society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
29.
Turner, V. W. (1986). Dewey, Dilthey, and drama: An essay in the anthropology of experience. In V. W. Turner & E. M. Bruner (Eds.), The anthropology of experience!(pp. 33-44). Urbana, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
von Eckartsberg, R. (1971). On experiential methodology. In A. Giorgi, W.F. Fischer, & R. von Eckartsberg (Eds.), Duquesne studies in phenomenological psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 66-79). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
31.
Wuest, J., & Merritt-Gray, M. (1997). Participatory action research: Practical dilemmas and emancipatory possibilities. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue (pp. 293-306). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
