This is a study of poverty as it is constructed in the talk of 11 guests who regularly eat at a soup kitchen in upstate New York. Framed within the perspective that talk constitutes identity and action, this study offers a critical interpretation of how the soup kitchen guests present themselves and the other impoverished guests of the kitchen. The essay also evaluates their characterizations in terms of how they may reflect or influence society's views and policies on poverty. The interpretation and evaluation are guided by the concept "relevancy in meaning" as it is being developed in interpretive audience studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ang, I. ( 1985). Watching "Dallas."London: Methuen.
2.
Aristotle. (1954). Rhetoric (W. Rhys Roberts, Trans.). New York: Random House.
3.
Baum, A.S., & Burnes, D.W. (1993). A nation in denialBoulder, CO: Westview.
4.
Black, E. (1970). The second personaQuarterly Journal of Speech, 56,109-119.
5.
Brock, B.L., Scott, R.L., & Chesebro, J.W. (1989). Methods of rhetorical criticismDetroit: Wayne State University Press.
6.
Brummett, B. (1994). Rhetoric in popular cultureNew York: St. Martin's.
7.
Burke, K. (1969a). A grammar of motivesBerkeley : University of California Press. (Original work published 1945)
8.
Burke, K. (1969b). A rhetoric of motivesBerkeley : University of California Press. (Original work published 1950)
9.
Campbell, T.L., & Reeves, J.L. (1989). Covering the homeless: The Joyce Brown storyCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 6, 21-42.
10.
Cicero. (1962). Orator (H. M. Hubbell, Trans.). London: William Heinemann.
11.
Cohen, J.R. (1991 a). Intersecting and competing discourses in Harvey Fierstein's "Tidy Endings."The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 77, 196-207.
12.
Cohen, J.R. (1991b). The "relevance" of cultural identity in audience's interpretations of mass mediaCritical Studies of Mass Communication, 8, 442-454.
13.
Evans, W.A. (1990). The interpretive turn in media research: Innovation, iteration, or illusion?Critical Studies in Mass Communication , 7,147-168.
14.
Fiske, J. (1988). Meaningful momentsCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 5, 246-250.
15.
Fiske, J. (1991). For cultural interpretation: A study of the culture of homelessnessCritical Studies in Mass Communication , 8, 455-474.
16.
Foss, S.K. (1996). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practiceProspect Heights, IL: Waveland .
17.
Foss, S.K., Foss, K.A., & Trapp, R. (1991). Contemporary perspectives on rhetoric . Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
18.
Gould, C., Stem, D., & Adams, T.D. (1981). T.V.s distorted vision of povertyCommunication Quarterly, 29, 309-315.
19.
Hall, S. (1985). Signification, representation, ideology: Altusser and the post-structuralist debatesCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 2 , 97-116.
20.
Hill, F. (1972). Conventional wisdom—Traditional Form—The President's message of Nov. 3,1969The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58, 370-385
21.
; Campbell, K.K., A rejoinder, p. 451
22.
; and Hill, F., Reply to Professor Campbell, pp. 451-460.
23.
Illouz, E. (1994). Defense or prosecution? The ideology of poverty in elite and popular pressJournal of Communication Inquiry, 18, 45-62.
24.
Isocrates. (1956). Antidosis (G. Norlin, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
25.
Katz, E. (1987). Communications research since LazarsfeldPublic Opinion Quarterly, 51 , S25-S45.
26.
Katz, M.B. (1989). The undeserving poor: From the war on poverty to the war on welfareNew York: Pantheon.
27.
Liebes, T. (1988). Cultural differences in the retelling of television fictionCritical Studies in Mass Communication , 5, 277-292.
28.
Liebes, T. (1989). On the convergence of theories of mass communication and literature regarding the role of the "reader." In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in the communication sciences (Vol. 9, pp. 123-143). Norwood, NJ : Ablex.
29.
Liebes, T., & Katz, E. (1989). On the critical abilities of television viewers In E. Seiter, H. Borchers, G. Kreutzner, & E. Warth (Eds.), Remote control: Television, audiences, and cultural power (pp. 204-222). London: Routledge .
30.
Long, E. (1986). Women, reading, and cultural authority: Some implications of the audience perspective in cultural studiesAmerican Quarterly, 38, 591-612.
31.
McChesney, R.W. (1993). Critical communication research at the crossroadsJournal of Communication, 43, 98-104.
32.
Meacham, J. (1993, November). Down and outThe Washington Monthly, pp. 24-30.
33.
Mead, L.M. (1992). The new politics of povertyNew York: Basic Books.
34.
Morley, D. (1980). The "Nationwide" audienceLondon: British Film Institute.
35.
Morley, D. (1986). Family television: Cultural power and domestic leisureLondon: Comedia.
36.
Quirk, W.J., & Bridwell, R.R. (1992). Abandoned: The betrayal of the American middle class since World War IILanham, MD: Madison.
37.
Radway, J.A. (1984). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literatureChapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
38.
Real, M. (1989). Super media: A cultural studies approachNewbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Shotter, J., & Gergen, K. (1989). Texts of identityLondon: Sage.
Williamson, J. (Ed.). (1986). Consuming passions: The dynamics of popular culture.London: Marion Boyars.
42.
Wilson, W.J. (1987). The truly disadvantagedChicago : University of Chicago Press.
43.
Zarefsky, D. (1984). President Johnson's war on poverty: The rhetoric of three "establishment" movements In T. Windt & B. Ingold (Eds.), Essays in presidential rhetoric (pp. 106-133). Dubuque, IA : Kendall/Hunt.
