Dissemination of research findings through the traditional vehicles of academic publication no longer fulfills funders' expectations. "Deliverables" now often include evidence of effect, or demonstrable change. This article describes strategies for intentional effort to create change in human behavior as an outcome of discoveries made through interpretive research. The approaches emerged from and are illustrated by one phenomenological study but have potential applicability in any investigation of everyday experience. Strategies direct attention to (a) the sociopolitical context; (b) personalized findings; (c) ownership of findings; (d) the use of defense mechanisms; (e) conflict resolution; (f) opportunities for change; and (g) support during the implementation of changes. The author illuminates the benefits, the risks, and the moral responsibility associated with using qualitative research findings to affect change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Balint, M. (1964). The doctor, his patient, and the illness (2nded.). New York: International Universities Press.
2.
Barrington, G. (1992). Evaluation skills nobody taught me. In A. Vaux, M. Stockdale, & M. Schiverin (Eds.), Independent consulting for evaluators (pp. 69-84). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Berger, P.L., & Luckman, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise on the sociology of knowledgeGarden City, NY: Doubleday.
4.
Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1976). Consultation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
Browne, G., Watt, S., Roberts, J., Gafni, A., Byrne, C., & Partners in Affiliated Health and Social Service Agencies
6.
( 1994). Within our reach: Restructuring alliances in health and social services at the local level (Working Paper series 94-1). Hamilton, Ontario, Canada : System-Linked Research Unit, Health and Social Service Utilization, McMaster University.
7.
Chelimsky, E. (1987). The politics of program evaluation. Society, 25, 24-32.
8.
Clandinin, D.J., & Connelly, F.M. (1994). Personal experience methods . In N. Denzin & Y Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 413-417). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Cristiani, M. (1992). Creating challenging client-consultant relationships In A. Vaux, M. Stockdatel, & M. Schewerin (Eds.), Independent consulting for evaluators (pp. 51-68). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
Denzin, N. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rded.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier.
12.
Dixon, A. (1990). The evolution of clinical policies. Medical Care, 28, 201-220.
13.
Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1983). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without givingNew York: Penguin.
14.
Fox, R., Mazmanian, P., & Putnam, R. (1989). Changing and learning in the lives of physiciansNew York: Praeger.
15.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodologyEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
Goffman, E. (1969). The presentation of self in everyday lifeGarden City, NY: Doubleday.
17.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Kuzel, A., & Like, R. (1991). Standards of trustworthiness for qualitative studies in primary care. In P. Norton, M. Stewart, F. Tudiver, M. J. Bass, & E. V. Dunn (Eds.), Primary care research: Traditional and innovative approaches (pp. 138-158). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Lomas, J. (1993). Retailing research: Increasing the role of evidence in clinical services for childbirth. The Milbank Quarterly , 71, 439-475.
21.
Lomas, J. (1994). Teaching old (and not so old) docs new tricks: Effective ways to implement research findings. In E. V Dunn, P. G. Norton, M. Stewart, F. Tudiver, & M. J. Bass (Eds.), Disseminating research/changing practice: Research methods for primary care (Vol. 6, pp. 1-18). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
22.
McWilliam, C.L. (1992). From hospital to home: Elderly patients' discharge experiences. Family Medicine, 24, 256-267.
23.
McWilliam, C.L., Brown, J.B., Carmichael, J.L., & Lehman, J.M. (1994). A New Perspective on Threatened Autonomy: The Disempowering Process. Social Science and Medicine , 38, 327-338.
24.
McWilliam, C.L., & Sangster, J.F. (1994). Managing patient discharge to home: The challenges of achieving quality of careInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 6,147-161.
25.
McWilliam, C.L., Stewart, M., Sangster, J.F., Brown, J., & Wong, C. (1993). Achieving the transition from hospital to home: How older patients and their caregivers experience the discharge process (Working Paper series, Paper #93-1London, Ontario: Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario.
26.
McWilliam, C.L., & Wong, C. (1994). Keeping it secret: The costs and benefits of nursing's hidden work in discharging patientsNursing Times , 90,11.
27.
Mittman, B., Tonesk, X., & Jacobson, P. (1992). Implementing clinical practice guidelines: Social influence strategies and practitioner behaviour changeQuality Review Bulletin, 18 , 413-422.
28.
Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nded.). Newbury Park: Sage.
29.
Prochaska, J., & Di Clemente, C.C. (1992). Stages of change in the modification of problem-behaviours In M. Hersen, R. M. Eisler, & P. M. Miller (Eds.), Progress in behaviour modificatwn (pp. 184-214). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
30.
Rist, R. (1994). Influencing the policy process with qualitative research. In N. Denzin, & Y Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 545-558). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Robbins, S. (1976). The administrative process: Integrating theory and practiceEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32.
Rogers, E. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rded.). New York: Free Press.
33.
Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy . Boston: Houghton Mifflin .
34.
Sarbin, T. R. (Ed.). (1986). Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct.New York: Praeger.
